- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Soooooo.......which one works..?
Posted on 8/2/21 at 3:42 pm to Mr. Hangover
Posted on 8/2/21 at 3:42 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:
I hope you choke on your mask while riding your vespa outdoors you communist piece of shite
Wow.
I don't like wearing masks. I'm not happy the mask mandate is back. I don't own a vespa. I'm not a communist.
1
Posted on 8/2/21 at 3:43 pm to ShinerHorns
quote:
Typical leftist tactic. Moving the goal posts yet again. Sickening.
What goal post did I move? I've never said either work 100%.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 3:43 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
I didn't say they "don't work." I said they don't work 100%.
Why isn't there a generally understood percentage on how much the masks "work" by now? Another guy posting in this thread linked to the CDC page, and they've got possible efficacy percentages literally all over the board from 0.49% to 79%.
How can we not have something more accurate by now, given that these masks are now seen as the chief driving force we are using to stop this?
Posted on 8/2/21 at 3:45 pm to Y.A. Tittle
You can’t fear monger if they only work 1% of the time.
If one is vaccinated and wears a mask they should shut the frick up.
Masks and vaccinations either work or they don’t.
If one is vaccinated and wears a mask they should shut the frick up.
Masks and vaccinations either work or they don’t.
This post was edited on 8/2/21 at 4:17 pm
Posted on 8/2/21 at 3:46 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
How can we not have something more accurate by now, given that these masks are now seen as the chief driving force we are using to stop this?
And given the fact that we had real world test cases where various states tried things differently? Surely states like Texas and Florida should have had astronomically higher rates than California when they pulled the masks mandates in early Spring?
Well, did they?
Posted on 8/2/21 at 3:47 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Neither work 100%.
neither work even close to 100%
Posted on 8/2/21 at 3:48 pm to RoosterCogburn585
Masks are dubious at best, especially they way 80% of people wear them. The restaurant mask policies seem like a parody and will be made fun of in 30 years like "duck and cover" from the 1950s is now.
Vaccines work, but not 100%.
Vaccines work, but not 100%.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 3:51 pm to roadGator
quote:
Masks and vaccinations either work or they don’t.
That makes no sense
Their relative efficacy is important. Everyone (even little bitches like you) knows that nothing is 100%
Posted on 8/2/21 at 3:53 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Neither work 100%.
Yeah, no shite.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 3:55 pm to Powerman
Ahhhhh nice to hear back from you powerman. Last time I asked you a question, I didn't hear back. Glad you are still alive.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 3:56 pm to Powerman
quote:
Their relative efficacy is important.
Except, it seems, for the fact that it appears apparently NOBODY has a clue as to what that is with regard to masks.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 3:56 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Why isn't there a generally understood percentage on how much the masks "work" by now? Another guy posting in this thread linked to the CDC page, and they've got possible efficacy percentages literally all over the board from 0.49% to 79%.
How can we not have something more accurate by now, given that these masks are now seen as the chief driving force we are using to stop this?
I googled your question. Pretty quickly saw many articles from many different sources saying masks help. Here are a couple pics from the EPS's website following an April Report.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 3:57 pm to Powerman
No shite. frick stick.
The point is you people should vaccinate and mask up.
Leave the rest of us alone.
My goodness you are such a cu-nt. A count that can’t take a hint.
No one gives a shite about your opinion here.
You open mouth selfie counts are just terrible.
The point is you people should vaccinate and mask up.
Leave the rest of us alone.
My goodness you are such a cu-nt. A count that can’t take a hint.
No one gives a shite about your opinion here.
You open mouth selfie counts are just terrible.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 3:58 pm to Mickey Goldmill
What does "Fitted Filtration Efficacy," and specifically those percentages, mean with regard to this covid virus?
Posted on 8/2/21 at 3:58 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Care to explain to me what FFE or fitted filtration efficiency is?
Posted on 8/2/21 at 4:02 pm to Powerman
quote:
nothing is 100%
wrong. democrats lying like a motherfricker is 100%.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 4:02 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
I didn't say they "don't work." I said they don't work 100%.
My question then still remains
Why wear one if it doesn't work? So if it works a little bit it's ok?
Posted on 8/2/21 at 4:04 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Did you find one with images of people wearing them below their noses, under their chin, etc because when this was in effect last time, a huge portion of masks were being worn like that.
Meaning, at no point during any of the mask mandates were masks being worn to any standard. Essentially, even when they were mandated, the lack of wearing them properly was virtually like not wearing them at all, so going BACK to that seems fricking absurd.
Meaning, at no point during any of the mask mandates were masks being worn to any standard. Essentially, even when they were mandated, the lack of wearing them properly was virtually like not wearing them at all, so going BACK to that seems fricking absurd.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 4:05 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
I'm not a communist.
You’re a liberal. Even worse
Posted on 8/2/21 at 4:06 pm to idlewatcher
The better question is:
When faced with a threat that poses a 10% chance of contraction and a 0.2% chance of taking your life, why in TF would you bother with a mask, much less an experimental genetic vaccine that has unknown long-term side affects and would have been shelved for excessive deaths at any other point in history?
When faced with a threat that poses a 10% chance of contraction and a 0.2% chance of taking your life, why in TF would you bother with a mask, much less an experimental genetic vaccine that has unknown long-term side affects and would have been shelved for excessive deaths at any other point in history?
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News