- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Some Louisiana lawmakers backing out of NDAs as questions arise over data centers & deals
Posted on 8/2/26 at 7:10 am
Posted on 8/2/26 at 7:10 am
quote:
Facing pressure from voters, a handful of state lawmakers are backing out of nondisclosure agreements that Gov. Jeff Landry’s administration has used to conduct secret negotiations with companies that often receive large tax breaks from the state.
Records show that 77% of state Senators have signed nondisclosure agreements at the behest of Louisiana Economic Development, the state agency in charge of attracting companies here. At least 14 of 105 House members, including several committee chairs and Speaker Phillip Devillier, have signed NDAs, according to copies of the agreements and a list of lawmakers who declined.
quote:
Landry’s spokesperson, Kate Kelly, didn’t respond to multiple messages seeking comment. Kelly is among the Landry staffers who signed an NDA, along with former chief of staff Kyle Ruckert and executive counsel Angelique Freel, according to records obtained by the Times-Picayune.
quote:
“We can’t look at these proposed investments as always being positive,” said Sen. Royce Duplessis, D-New Orleans, who is among the few Senators who declined to sign an NDA. “How do we ask the tough questions if we’re under these restrictions?”
quote:LINK
Rep. Joy Walters, D-Shreveport, said LED offered her an NDA last year to learn more about economic development deals in her district, including projects by the rapper 50 Cent, who has invested in Shreveport in recent years.
Then her constituents started raising questions about a planned Amazon data center in her district. They also pushed back against her decision to sign an NDA, she said. She said her constituents felt “betrayed” by it.
In May, she asked for the NDA to be canceled, and LED’s director of legislative affairs Chris Stelly wrote back saying the contract was terminated. He added that any confidential or proprietary information LED may have shared remains subject to the NDA for another year.
“My district feels strongly they do not want me to be under an NDA,” Walters said. “They don’t want any elected officials to be under an NDA.”
Sen. Hodges, R-Denham Springs, said in a statement that she “was told that in order to have a seat at the table to represent my constituents” about economic development deals, she would need to sign an NDA.
“But what I heard back from the voters was that they prefer transparency — so of course, I withdrew my consent to the NDA,” she said. “I will always try and do my best to represent my constituents and what is best for them.”
Landry wants to run the state like our elected officials are middle managers at Foot Locker.
Posted on 8/2/26 at 7:18 am to 4cubbies
They should all be recalled (including Landry).
Posted on 8/2/26 at 7:18 am to 4cubbies
You did fine until your stupid comment at the end.
Posted on 8/2/26 at 7:19 am to 4cubbies
NDAs are not magical.
They can be overridden by subpoena.
No one does an NDA over illegal activity anyway. They do them for competitive reasons.
I'm not falling for your nefarious and dark framing.
They can be overridden by subpoena.
No one does an NDA over illegal activity anyway. They do them for competitive reasons.
I'm not falling for your nefarious and dark framing.
Posted on 8/2/26 at 7:26 am to mauser
But too close to home for you?
Posted on 8/2/26 at 7:28 am to TrueTiger
quote:
I'm not falling for your nefarious and dark framing.
You approve of your elected officials hiding the things they are planning to do with taxpayer money from their constituents?
Posted on 8/2/26 at 7:43 am to 4cubbies
quote:
You approve of your elected officials hiding the things they are planning to do with taxpayer money from their constituents?
I don't approve of them telling businesses to forget about expanding into the state because its leaders refuse to engage in standard discussions under an NDA.
Posted on 8/2/26 at 7:48 am to TrueTiger
quote:
I don't approve of them telling businesses to forget about expanding into the state because its leaders refuse to engage in standard discussions under an NDA.
This
Posted on 8/2/26 at 7:58 am to 4cubbies
So are these discussions with different businesses where ideas and plans are thrown about but no commitment is being made by government officials? If so, NDAs are appropriate and should be used to keep dialogue open. If agreements are being made by government officials then obviously those agreements should not be under an NDA.
So which one is it?
So which one is it?
This post was edited on 8/2/26 at 8:02 am
Posted on 8/2/26 at 8:01 am to TrueTiger
quote:
I don't approve of them telling businesses to forget about expanding into the state because its leaders refuse to engage in standard discussions under an NDA.
You don’t care what our government does with taxpayer money in secret as long as a business is benefiting. Gotcha.
Posted on 8/2/26 at 8:06 am to 4cubbies
This is not unique to Landry or Louisiana.
Common practice among companies to protect their IP and the NDA allows lawmakers to be more involved and informed earlier in the process of these prospective projects.
Another swing and a miss for 4cubbies.
Common practice among companies to protect their IP and the NDA allows lawmakers to be more involved and informed earlier in the process of these prospective projects.
Another swing and a miss for 4cubbies.
Posted on 8/2/26 at 8:16 am to 4cubbies
quote:
You don’t care what our government does with taxpayer money in secret as long as a business is benefiting.
You imagined I said that because I did not say that.
This isn't a spending of taxpayer money issue at all because the taxes never got collected in order to spend them.
This is a picking winners and losers issue and I do have a complaint about that. I think we should ALL be getting tax breaks, not just a chosen few.
If we eliminated state income taxes entirely then that would attract businesses in general.
Posted on 8/2/26 at 8:46 am to 4cubbies
NDA’s are common talks and negotiations, there is no proof provided that NDA’s are being used in furtherance of illegal activities. Those would not hold up against laws so there would no need for signing one. Think you are trying to find a crime just so you can finger point
Posted on 8/2/26 at 8:55 am to 4cubbies
If these NDAs are so obviously bad, why wouldn’t they be rejected prior to signing? It seems like there was good reason to enter in the beginning. I’m genuinely curious about this.
Posted on 8/2/26 at 9:10 am to 4cubbies
What’s secretive about a data center . What IP is there?
Posted on 8/2/26 at 9:14 am to 4cubbies
Is this similar to the NDA you signed that has you completely tight lipped over being able to admit when you are wrong?
Posted on 8/2/26 at 9:16 am to 4cubbies
It should be illegal for a public official to sign an NDA, if the deal is so good then we should hear all about it.
Posted on 8/2/26 at 9:16 am to evil cockroach
Years and years of advance infrastructure commitment and funding.
Want to blab about it? …. then you shouldn’t expect to be awarded valuable projects and the jobs that come with it.
That’s reality.
In my case, if they weren’t under NDA then they were not privy to the conversation or planning.
Want to blab about it? …. then you shouldn’t expect to be awarded valuable projects and the jobs that come with it.
That’s reality.
In my case, if they weren’t under NDA then they were not privy to the conversation or planning.
This post was edited on 8/2/26 at 9:24 am
Posted on 8/2/26 at 9:21 am to TrueTiger
quote:
NDAs are not magical.
They can be overridden by subpoena.
No one does an NDA over illegal activity anyway. They do them for competitive reasons.
How does an NDA survive an open records request????
Posted on 8/2/26 at 9:27 am to ibldprplgld
quote:
This is not unique to Landry or Louisiana.
Common practice among companies to protect their IP and the NDA allows lawmakers to be more involved and informed earlier in the process of these prospective projects.
Another swing and a miss for 4cubbies
This.
I sign NDAs all the time. For refineries, military bases, yes, data centers. All kinds of things. It happens. Do find something else to bitch about.
Popular
Back to top

17











