- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Should a US Citizen have the right to protect property by use of deadly force?
Posted on 11/12/21 at 3:28 pm to Eli Goldfinger
Posted on 11/12/21 at 3:28 pm to Eli Goldfinger
With reasonable limitations, Hell yes!
Not just the defender's property, but any reasonably valuable property that is being destroyed or stolen.
Not just the defender's property, but any reasonably valuable property that is being destroyed or stolen.
0
Posted on 11/12/21 at 3:37 pm to Eli Goldfinger
People are more important than property. My first marriage ended in tragedy. I looked for my wife's killer for a year but gave up. Nobody would do it.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 4:26 pm to millerf43
quote:
Would you defund the police? Should the state have the right to use deadly force? If an individual has to enforce a "natural law," why would the individual consent to the state's power to use force?
Yes, No, you shouldn't.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 5:24 pm to jchamil
thats where his dad lives not him.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 5:32 pm to 56lsu
frick off. He had every right to be there.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 6:37 pm to Eli Goldfinger
It’s frightening that so many people in here actually think you can use deadly force to protect property. You can’t do it now. You can’t just go shoot people for stealing a package off your porch.
You can shoot people who enter your home, while you are in your home. The rationale is protecting your person though, not your property.
Edit: and the Rittenhouse trial is not about protecting property.
You can shoot people who enter your home, while you are in your home. The rationale is protecting your person though, not your property.
Edit: and the Rittenhouse trial is not about protecting property.
This post was edited on 11/12/21 at 6:38 pm
Posted on 11/12/21 at 7:50 pm to Eli Goldfinger
If you don’t aggressively prosecute thieves and vandals; then you embolden criminals to commit worse crimes.
I’m all for deadly force in the case of someone attempting to steal or destroy that which a person earned. If for no other reason than I’ve heard of too many “petty” crimes devolve into murder.
I’m all for deadly force in the case of someone attempting to steal or destroy that which a person earned. If for no other reason than I’ve heard of too many “petty” crimes devolve into murder.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 7:56 pm to LSUFAITHFUL
quote:
It’s frightening that so many people in here actually think you can use deadly force to protect property.
Read the OP. We are saying you should be allowed to use deadly force to protect property. Everyone here knows you can't do it legally.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 8:02 pm to LSUFAITHFUL
In Texas, deadly force may be used to protect property from criminal activity or to prevent a fleeing felon from making off with property, but only if the property owner “reasonably believes” the property cannot be protected by any other means, or attempted recovery would subject the owner to the risk of death or serious injury.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 8:04 pm to Eli Goldfinger
Um… we already do.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 8:24 pm to Eli Goldfinger
One of the basic understandings of a civil society until barack hussein the racist half-black usurper showed up.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:33 pm to LSUFAITHFUL
quote:
It’s frightening that so many people in here actually think you can use deadly force to protect property.
(b) A person may use deadly physical force under the circumstances set forth in subsection (a) of this section if:
(1) Use of deadly physical force is authorized by § 5-2-607; or
(2) The person reasonably believes the use of deadly physical force is necessary to prevent the commission of arson or burglary by a trespasser.
The whole state of Arkansas should scare the shite out of you then.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:41 pm to troyt37
quote:
We will certainly have the leftist twats in here saying, "so you value your property more than the lives of you fellow man"
Does the thief value my property more than their life?
If my family or friends are in the house how do I know their intent.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 10:37 pm to Eli Goldfinger
every day and twice on Sunday
Posted on 11/13/21 at 9:38 am to LSUFAITHFUL
quote:
You can shoot people who enter your home, while you are in your home
People who are attempting to unlawfully enter a building or vehicle that you are lawfully in.
You don't have to let them in, and you don't have to drag the body in afterwards.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News