- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sheesh people you are gullible re: Office Door Lock from Desk LOL.......UPDATED OP
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:19 pm to idlewatcher
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:19 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
But when coupled with existing allegations....from 3 women....all of whom worked at the same company....then it's pretty easy to connect the dots
Good fricking god this is why so many innocent men convicted. Because juries are retarded.
A door that locks remotely for an executive is not even unusual. If you have accusations you can't use the fricking door as evidence that the accusations are likely true
That's like being accused of fricking someone with a baseball bat and then someone comes to your house and says well he does have a bat. And the dudes like no shite I have a bat I coach baseball
And some fricking tarde jury says well you know I can connect the dots
God damn if you're ever accused of a sexual crime I would highly recommend not having a jury trial because juries are fricking composed of people in clearly people are stupid
4
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:20 pm to ShortyRob
calm down.
nobody from my CEO on down here has a remote 'door lock'....and he's a billionaire.
yes, a billionaire.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:21 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
what if 20% of the top Executives have those buttons? 10%? Or maybe just all of the on-air personalities?
If that were true, then I agree its a nothingburger and the first line of debunking it. That information should come out almost immediately if true.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:21 pm to ShortyRob
I can see it now. Some woman accuses my colonel of sexually assaulting her
Then someone else says will you know he can remotely lock his door! And they fricking use that as evidence that she's telling the truth
That's genius right there
Then someone else says will you know he can remotely lock his door! And they fricking use that as evidence that she's telling the truth
That's genius right there
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:22 pm to Dale51
quote:
If that were true, then I agree its a nothingburger and the first line of debunking it. That information should come out almost immediately if true.
You see that's the thing. I suspect the dude is guilty as frick. But that doesn't make trying to use this door thing as evidence is any less stupid
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:23 pm to CAD703X
quote:yes but I have already proven that this is very common feature. So what your CEO does isn't terribly relevant to that point
calm down.
nobody from my CEO on down here has a remote 'door lock'....and he's a billionaire.
yes, a billionaire
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:23 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
But that doesn't make trying to use this door thing as evidence is any less stupid
wanna bet the reason it came out was because of the pants dropping tendencies?
i'll put you on record as saying you think the fact he could lock his door remotely has nothing to do with the shitstorm about to hit.
This post was edited on 11/29/17 at 4:24 pm
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:24 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
A door that locks remotely for an executive is not even unusual.
You're just assuming it was, not me.
quote:
If you have accusations you can't use the fricking door as evidence that the accusations are likely true
Yes, everyone and their dog catcher knows that thanks.
quote:
And some fricking tarde jury says well you know I can connect the dots
Ever heard of circumstantial evidence?
quote:
God damn if you're ever accused of a sexual crime I would highly recommend not having a jury trial because juries are fricking composed of people in clearly people are stupid
This has you riled AF for some reason. Here, have a beer. 
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:29 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
But that doesn't make trying to use this door thing as evidence is any less stupid
Like a yearbook?
This post was edited on 11/29/17 at 4:30 pm
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:29 pm to Pvt Hudson
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:30 pm to CAD703X
quote:
i'll put you on record as saying you think the fact he could lock his door remotely has nothing to do with the shitstorm about to hit.
The fact someone can lock their door remotely is evidence that a person can lock their door remotely and nothing else
If the dude assaulted women he deserves whatever is coming to him
That doesn't make any and every last fricking idiot who thinks the door is proof of it less stupid
If you're going to sit there and tell me most people will think that I will tell you I've met people and people are fricking stupid
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:34 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
That doesn't make any and every last fricking idiot who thinks the door is proof of it less stupid
i think the problem is the story of the remote door lock came out prior to how he used it.
i'm guessing the other shoe will drop over and over and you'll just say 'meh, still doesn't mean anything'
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:36 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
That doesn't make any and every last fricking idiot who thinks the door is proof of it less stupid
Still, had to be useful in giving them one last chance to reconsider
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:41 pm to CAD703X
A remote door doesn’t mean anything, but when you’re accused of the stuff he is it does
I don’t think owning kitchen knives is relevant but it may be if you’re charged with butchering your wife and her waiter.
Still I get what the OP is saying. It’s being mischaracterized as being unusual when it’s not.
I don’t think owning kitchen knives is relevant but it may be if you’re charged with butchering your wife and her waiter.
Still I get what the OP is saying. It’s being mischaracterized as being unusual when it’s not.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:41 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
Matt Lauer once gave a colleague a sex toy as a present. It included an explicit note about how he wanted to use it on her, which left her mortified. On another day, he summoned a different female employee to his office, and then dropped his pants, showing her his penis
quote:
Pretty sure he needed a locked door for this.
...and as cucked and metro-sexual as Lauer was, a magnifying glass probably would have been called for as well!
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:49 pm to CAD703X
quote:
nobody from my CEO on down here has a remote 'door lock'....and he's a billionaire.
yes, a billionaire.
I have a remote lock on my office door,and my office is in a barn.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:52 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
But that door lock ain't telling ya shite
No, it's how you use it.
If he's using it to lock chicks in then whip out his little pecker, it's much different.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:59 pm to ShortyRob
So what...did he have a cell phone app that whipped his schlong out?
Posted on 11/29/17 at 5:29 pm to Knight of Old
quote:
So what...did he have a cell phone app that whipped his schlong out?
They have an app for that?
Posted on 11/29/17 at 5:34 pm to ShortyRob
uh, lets see Shorty thinks the door lock isn't a thing because lots of execs have them. Yet we're in the midst of multitudes of executives getting canned because they felt free to harass
Methinks a lot of these door lock thingys are about to be removed from the workplace
Methinks a lot of these door lock thingys are about to be removed from the workplace
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News