Started By
Message

re: Self-esteem & the “Crisis of the Young”

Posted on 7/5/26 at 5:11 pm to
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
22926 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

We could have saved trillions and actually solved poverty if we just went to direct payments instead of "services"

We have solved poverty, the version known a few decades ago. What we're witnessing is new/updated definitions of poverty that need solving.

If the poorest Americans lived in 3,000 ft2 homes, drove their choice of vehicle under $60K (one for each adult), was able to eat out (nice dinner) twice per week and could comfortably afford to take one 2-wk vacation per year to anywhere in the world, and everybody above them on the economic ladder lived better and better the further up you go - those folks in the 3,000 ft2 homes would still be our "poor".
Posted by Sid E Walker
BackdoorU ©
Member since Nov 2013
25778 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 5:20 pm to
Let us know when you get to the chapter of Hot Bikes & Horny Homeless People.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140154 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

Backer talked about how, in their total dependency, kids experience ultimate freedom.
Which is absurd on it's face. Right? It is a man wanting to impress himself with his own sophistry.

Kids have only the freedom their guardians and peers grant, regardless of Becker's presumed perception.

quote:

Maybe we could relive our childhood freedom
A term for that is "immaturity."
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140154 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

If the poorest Americans lived in 3,000 ft2 homes, drove their choice of vehicle under $60K (one for each adult), was able to eat out (nice dinner) twice per week and could comfortably afford to take one 2-wk vacation per year to anywhere in the world, and everybody above them on the economic ladder lived better and better the further up you go - those folks in the 3,000 ft2 homes would still be our "poor".
You hit at a politically incorrect topic.

Our "poverty-level" is Italian MIDDLE-class.

How can that be ... if we are engaging in fair assessment?
It cannot!

Our current assignment of poverty would apply to a majority of us households in the 1960's-1970's, and before.
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
8421 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 5:47 pm to
quote:

Grandparents on my mother's side were Volga Germans that had to escape the Bolsheviks (for America) but didn't do so until after losing a child to starvation. They lost another child on the long "road" to America. They had 11 kids total. My grandpa laid rail in the Dakotas until his back gave up on him. My uncles and aunts ran the gamut - most rose from their beginnings and found success/greater wealth, a few struggled their whole life economically and with alcohol. I think it's a fairly common story for late 19th century/early 20th century immigrants.

One thing the whole family had, however, was a deep appreciation for America and what it meant to be a citizen. To my grandpa, bringing the family to America was his greatest accomplishment and he was forever grateful. He struggled with English, struggled physically an unskilled laborer, struggled to make ends meet - but that dude would have starved himself before taking anything being offered by the government in the way of assistance.

Hard times build great men.

quote:

As my family has talked about "us" and remembered our history, I've got to say that which generation (as in silent, boomer, etc) everyone fit in never came up. It was only when I started participating in these threads (2020/Covid) that I saw so much made of generations. I always considered it more a family evolution thing - like for my family - my grandparents sacrificed a lot to became Americans, which made it better/easier for their kids, and the next generation of kids (mine) had it better/easier, and the next generation (my kids) had it better/easier.


I agree that it varies with families, conservative families will pass down family values longer than liberal ones.
But to that point, the North East has been a hotbed of liberalism since long before Woodstock.
quote:

That's why it's fascinating to see so many young people complaining about their lot in life. It's hard to argue, if you're being factual/realistic, that life doesn't get better and easier over time for Americans and it's odd (to me) that so many will do somersaults in logic to feel aggrieved.

Agreed, my uncle lives in government housing where his life is basically paid for (SSDI/SSI) and he can do anything he wants (He's in his mid 70s).
He never got married, never held a job for long, and still thinks "Reagan was terrible".
Posted by FearlessFreep
Baja Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
20141 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

My suspicion is that the crisis of modernity isn’t that people have discovered the old sources of meaning were fraudulent; it’s that we’ve systematically destroyed the institutions that allowed ordinary people to feel that their lives mattered.
that part
This post was edited on 7/5/26 at 6:07 pm
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
62139 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

If the poorest Americans lived in 3,000 ft2 homes, drove their choice of vehicle under $60K (one for each adult), was able to eat out (nice dinner) twice per week and could comfortably afford to take one 2-wk vacation per year to anywhere in the world, and everybody above them on the economic ladder lived better and better the further up you go - those folks in the 3,000 ft2 homes would still be our "poor".


This actually speaks to one of Becker’s premises: humans spend their lives chasing self-esteem and convincing themselves they are special and their lives matter.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
62139 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 6:34 pm to
Ok I’m starting to reject some of his arguments. I presume this is simply a product of what was trending at the time but I find emphasis on sex, the anus, genitals to be boring and unenlightening.

Becker spent many pages detailing the duality of man (the animal vs the self-aware person) before denying man has instincts.

I’m disappointed. Is this what you were referring to when you warned me about what the book is really about, NC?
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14327 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

This actually speaks to one of Becker’s premises: humans spend their lives chasing self-esteem and convincing themselves they are special and their lives matter.


Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
62139 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

Which is absurd on it's face. Right?


Is it? My toddler has no inhibitions, no insecurities, no anxiety. He leads a very charmed life.

quote:

Kids have only the freedom their guardians and peers grant, regardless of Becker's presumed perception.
Adult have only the freedom their guardians grant, as well. And adults have to pay bills. Who is more free?

quote:

A term for that is "immaturity."

I beg to differ. I think It’s human nature. We want options and autonomy.
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
8421 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

Ok I’m starting to reject some of his arguments. I presume this is simply a product of what was trending at the time but I find emphasis on sex, the anus, genitals to be boring and unenlightening.

He was professor of the year at Berkley for a reason.

If you read it at 19 it comes off very different than 2 decades plus later lol.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
62139 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 7:52 pm to
He found out he was dying while writing the book so I’m sure that colored the experience for him. I wonder if his imminent demise gave him permission to be extra-provocative.

quote:

If you read it at 19 it comes off very different than 2 decades plus later lol.
when I pick up books I enjoyed in my late teens/early 20s, I’m horrified at my absence of taste.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140154 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

A term for that is "immaturity."

I beg to differ. I think It’s human nature. We want options and autonomy.
Acting like a child, or assuming the responsibilities of a child, is immaturity, by definition.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
62139 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 9:04 pm to
Desiring a Life free from strife isn’t exactly synonymous with immaturity.
Posted by Sweep Da Leg
Member since Sep 2013
4202 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 9:27 pm to
quote:

This actually speaks to one of Becker’s premises: humans spend their lives chasing self-esteem and convincing themselves they are special and their lives matter.


Wrong. This is what immature emotional overgrown children do. Or democrats. I mean Marxist lemmings like yourself. It’s why you’re so easily manipulated and strive for illogical nonsense
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14327 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

My toddler has no inhibitions, no insecurities, no anxiety.


First of all, that's not true. Toddlers have all kinds of anxiety, starting with separation anxiety. They fear the dark, they have anxiety about changes in routine (over which they have no autonomy or control), medical visits, strangers, etc.

Even if what you said was true, he also doesn't choose when he gets up, whether he brushes his teeth or not, what he eats for lunch, who he interacts with, where he goes, whether he gets a haircut or not or if he does, what kind, he doesn't choose his clothes, his food, his shoes, his living arrangements, what he spends his days and nights doing, or when he goes to bed. He doesn't control who he has to interact with or who interacts with him.

quote:

Adult have only the freedom their guardians grant


And in the United States, that's a hell of a lot of freedom.

quote:

And adults have to pay bills. Who is more free?


Adults, and it's not close.

Stop it with this nonsense, will you? We've already been over this. You are equating responsibility with lack of freedom. Responsibility is the price of freedom, not the opposite of freedom.

Children have almost no freedom specifically because they lack the capacity for responsibility.

There's a lot of hippie diluted Marxist inspired bullshite from the early 70s that is frankly embarrassing to dredge up and realize that anyone took it seriously back then. What you are reading is obviously part of that genre.

Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14327 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

Desiring a Life free from strife isn’t exactly synonymous with immaturity.


I'd say it is when it's obvious that an adult life free from strife is impossible.

It's just like desiring a unicorn or a magic flute.
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
91731 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

4cubbies


4chubbies???


Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
62139 posts
Posted on 7/5/26 at 9:54 pm to
You’re missing the whole conversation because you already know everything. This work is about existential dread. Toddlers don’t experience existential dread in the way self-aware adults do. They are free from the search for meaning and purpose. They just exist.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140154 posts
Posted on 7/6/26 at 6:28 am to
quote:

My toddler has no inhibitions, no insecurities, no anxiety.
That really isn't true, is it? E.g., What does your munchkin think about going to the doctor? Stranger danger? Being alone? Bad dreams?

quote:

Who is more free?
Adults, obviously. But they carry with it an associated understanding of responsibility, and of mortality.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram