- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS Opinion Day - June 30
Posted on 6/30/26 at 10:58 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/30/26 at 10:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If we are no longer a nation of laws, I reckon the Leftists will have the advantage
lol.
I’m so glad the leftists do not have an advantage in the courts.
Dumbfrick.
2
Posted on 6/30/26 at 10:59 am to the808bass
Posted on 6/30/26 at 10:59 am to Ailsa
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:01 am to the808bass
quote:
I’m so glad the leftists do not have an advantage in the courts.
Dumbfrick.
Much of this advantage is just perceived (at this level, at least) because of how retarded both Trump admins have been in terms of governing.
This EO was incredibly stupid and not thought out well. Intelligent people told you this the day it was issued. However, it got the emotional reacts form the Ow! My balls! crowd, which I assume was the intended impact. Serious lawyers would not have written the EO in this manner, setting themselves up for such anticipated failure. That example is not displaying an advantage for leftits.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:02 am to Placekicker
quote:
The fact that he wrote a 91 page dissent for this monstrosity of a decision on birthright shows how absolutely infuriated he is.
It's sad that his dramatic emotional-partisan shift at the end of his storied career is going to define so much of his legacy.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:12 am to Placekicker
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:
1) No VISA access into the USA ???? if your pregnant
2) No TSA flights for any foreigner into the USA if pregnant
3) Restrict VISAs from China ???? and Birthright industry countries into the USA for women until they stop abusing our constitutional law to exploit the 14th Amendment adopted for the children of slaves!
Let’s go Trump!!!
Let’s see immediate TSA/DHS pregnancy test screening for all NoN-USA women flying into the USA effective immediately at their expense! Thanks to SCOTUS!!
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:20 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Jurisdiction and allegiance are not the same.
Ohh, so allegiance is what matters, someone should try to make that argument in court. We could call it IDK.... sovereign citizen.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:23 am to lionward2014
quote:
It's as unambiguous as "shall not be infringed."
Define "lawful jurisdiction thereof". There is zero context provided in the text.
Hmm, perhaps the crafters of the 14th had thoughts?
This post was edited on 6/30/26 at 11:24 am
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
sad that his dramatic emotional-partisan shift at the end of his storied career is going to define so much of his legacy.
Everyone is partisan. It's just a matter of how you hide it.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:26 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This EO was incredibly stupid and not thought out well. Intelligent people told you this the day it was issued.
Anyone marginally principled should agree that an EO can’t override the constitution
That said, id support Congress fixing birth right citizenship.
This post was edited on 6/30/26 at 11:29 am
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:34 am to rt3
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:36 am to SlowFlowPro
Oh, I knew this EO didn’t have a chance in hell.
I posted that numerous times.
I posted that numerous times.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:38 am to the808bass
Has Congress always been inept at getting stuff done? When did the rush of EO start because Congress wouldn’t act how they are supposed to? Has it always been that way?
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:39 am to the808bass
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:
Suppose that a person's only connection to this country is that he was born here to a mother who was present just long enough to give birth and then quickly return to her native country.
Suppose that country is a strategic adversary or enemy of the United States. Suppose the child never visited the United States while grow and was inculcated with hatred of this country.
According to this court, now, that person is a citizen of the United States. He can enter and leave the country as he pleases. He can travel the world on a US passport.
Even if he plots to harm this country, he cannot be deprived of his status as a citizen, at least under current precedent."
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:41 am to Ailsa
quote:
According to this court, now, that person is a citizen of the United States.
This court and 250 years of precedent lol Alito tilting at windmills
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:51 am to shinerfan
quote:
Define "lawful jurisdiction thereof". There is zero context provided in the text.
The word "lawful" doesn't appear in the 14th. Unambiguous doesn't mean it is spelled out within the text. Words have meanings, and courts should give those words their common meanings when interpreting statutes.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:52 am to Dire Wolf
quote:
Anyone marginally principled should agree that an EO can’t override the constitution
That said, id support Congress fixing birth right citizenship.
Congress also cannot override the Constitution.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:53 am to Ailsa
Trump is wrong. Shocker. Stephen Miller probably told him that was the outcome from today.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:59 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's sad that his dramatic emotional-partisan shift at the end of his storied career is going to define so much of his legacy.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 12:01 pm to Ailsa
quote:
No long and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment is necessary
A long or unwieldy amendment, no. An amendment, yes.
Page 9 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News