Started By
Message

School choice candidates unseated *12* rural anti-choice rural repubs in Texas last night

Posted on 3/6/24 at 9:08 am
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69274 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 9:08 am
This is huge news for passing the bills through the legislature

quote:

In a major victory for Gov. Greg Abbott, at least a dozen proponents of private school vouchers on Tuesday defeated incumbent House lawmakers or forced them into runoff elections in key Republican primaries across the state.
The early results – with three more races too close to call after midnight – were a political show of force for the governor after he suffered an embarrassing defeat in November when 21 Republicans joined Democrats to block his voucher plan.

As of early Wednesday, eight of those 21 seats were set to be replaced outright by pro-voucher members, while four more were headed for runoffs in late May. In one other, a pro-voucher candidate held a lead with all the votes counted, but the Associated Press had not yet called the race.
Abbott doled out more than $6 million across 15 races and made dozens of campaign stops to support pro-voucher candidates. The outcome will likely reshape the debate over vouchers, which rural Republicans killed last year over fears they would hurt the state's public schools.



Trump also was involved here. He actively supported all the school choice candidates and made robocalls against the anti-choice gop incumbents

LINK


Posted by TheHumanTornado
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since May 2008
3763 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 9:32 am to
Because what America needs is for rich people to get tax money for private schools they already easily afford.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54206 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 9:46 am to
quote:

Because what America needs is for rich people to get tax money for private schools they already easily afford.


If I had the choice of paying my taxes to public schools or private schools I know which way I would go. Paying taxes into something you feel nets you a positive return is a lot easier to stomach than paying taxes to something where you feel you get a negative return for your contribution.

I would think anyone with common sense reasoning would want the same no matter how rich or poor one might be paying those taxes.
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13494 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Because what America needs is for rich people to get tax money for private schools they already easily afford.


The purpose of state education is to educate all children how to function in their state regardless of all concerns including economics!

Like the Old West where the principle of “the calf follows the cow”, the money should follow the child, and the parents or guardians should determine where it’s spent. Think the GI bill where we trust the adults to make the responsible choice of what institution best meets their needs.

Your attempt to spawn jealousy to divide Americans is just plain evil. And you are trying to deny the less affluent the same choices in schools that the rich people actually have. That is a second evil.

Have you no shame?
Posted by mudshuvl05
Member since Nov 2023
596 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Because what America needs is for rich people to get tax money for private schools they already easily afford.
stop being emotional, you're acting like your mother.

if a taxpaying citizen wants a voucher to send their child, using their own tax money, to a better school, then so be it. it's not "just rich people," it's people who care enough about their children's education to be proactive about it.

if a democrat doesn't care about their child getting the best education as is possible, then send them to the shite school right down the street, nobody cares. those people are a lost cause anyway.

you're lying, you're emotional, and you don't care about the children of taxpayers getting the best education possible. you care about talking points and virtue signaling. shame on you.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422172 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 10:02 am to
quote:

if a taxpaying citizen wants a voucher to send their child, using their own tax money, to a better school, then so be it. it's not "just rich people," it's people who care enough about their children's education to be proactive about it.

if a democrat doesn't care about their child getting the best education as is possible, then send them to the shite school right down the street, nobody cares. those people are a lost cause anyway.

As long as enrollment is open for all options, obviously.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
78399 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 10:09 am to
quote:

Because what America needs is for rich people to get tax money for private schools they already easily afford.


Sad and low IQ response when it would OVERWHELMINGLY help black children in hopeless urban wastelands. As always, stay true to your ideological orthodoxy, and frick the people you pretend to champion.

Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
18602 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Because what America needs is for rich people to get tax money for private schools they already easily afford.



Found the groomer.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54206 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 10:38 am to
quote:

As long as enrollment is open for all options


Such as?
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
35289 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 11:02 am to
This is probably going to ruin private schools. If I wanted to send my kids to a school that takes state monies, I’d do that.


Congrats, I guess.
Posted by TejasHorn
High Plains Driftin'
Member since Mar 2007
10910 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 11:57 am to
This is not going to end well for rural districts, where even if you’re well off private schools are often not an option.

Gonna be tough seeing that tax money instead go to help rich families in Preston Hollow put their kids through St. Marks. But Abbot knows where his bread is buttered and it’s not BFE.
This post was edited on 3/6/24 at 11:59 am
Posted by bluedragon
Birmingham
Member since May 2020
6435 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 12:08 pm to
Get their kids out of the stupidity of the Union controlled idiots teaching our kids. NOT THE STATES KIDS.

Get your butt motivated enough, you can get scholarships offered to cut some or all of the costs.
Posted by TexSolo
Member since Oct 2023
273 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

This is not going to end well for rural districts, where even if you’re well off private schools are often not an option.


Have you or any of the other naysayers considered, that if money is available, someone may open up a great private school in rural areas?
Posted by Jspaspa3303
Member since Jun 2020
2380 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Trump also was involved here. He actively supported all the school choice candidates and made robocalls against the anti-choice gop incumbents


This guy must have had an epiphany , recent post sound as if you’re voting for Trump, and not Biden or Hillary this time around . About time your arse wakes up.
Posted by Wasp
Off Highland rd.
Member since Sep 2012
1483 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 1:12 pm to
Does anyone know how it actually works?
Is it a tax credit? Is it based on your property taxes paid or is based on per pupil spending?

It’s great to say the money should follow the student but what does this actually look like?

I live in 70808 and paid ~$1300 in EBR school taxes. That’s a lot less then the private tuition I paid for two kids.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51517 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

Because what America needs is for taxes to be continually pumped into an education system run within a framework of proven failure.



Fixed.
Posted by 31TIGERS
Mike’s habitat
Member since Dec 2004
7219 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

As long as enrollment is open for all options, obviously.


The ultimate goal is to keep kids safe from freakazoid pedo groomers like you, you lying, sick POS!

Take your “enrollment is open for all options” and shove it up your arse. Of course you’d probably enjoy that.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69274 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

Does anyone know how it actually works?


If you take your kid out of the zip code assigned school, you will be given the funds to go to another public school or private school

Basically, schools are no longer given blanket funds, the kids are given the funds.
Posted by Wasp
Off Highland rd.
Member since Sep 2012
1483 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 1:45 pm to
I get that part. I’m asking how are the funds determined? EBR spends more per pupil on education then the average private school tuition in EBR.
Posted by Tigers0918
Member since Feb 2020
1291 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 2:26 pm to
does this mean all schools getting government money will have to adhere to public school standards and testing?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram