Started By
Message

Saw where the Michigan shooter

Posted on 12/2/21 at 6:40 am
Posted by tiger1616
Member since May 2020
527 posts
Posted on 12/2/21 at 6:40 am
Was also charged with terrorism. Was wondering if the RED SUV had been charged with it yet.
Posted by GCTigahs
Member since Oct 2014
2033 posts
Posted on 12/2/21 at 6:55 am to
I’m wondering if he’ll be able to bail out like the last school shooter.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64635 posts
Posted on 12/2/21 at 7:23 am to
This is how institutionalized racism works. Is this not what all these folks protest against.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21546 posts
Posted on 12/2/21 at 7:43 am to
We live in a society that treats cars and SUVs differently.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
98862 posts
Posted on 12/2/21 at 7:45 am to
Red SUV was just on it's way to trucking school.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67767 posts
Posted on 12/2/21 at 7:46 am to
quote:

Was wondering if the RED SUV had been charged with it yet.


Maybe they should charge the firearm for the crime.

They already think that guns kill people.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
98862 posts
Posted on 12/2/21 at 7:52 am to
quote:

They already think that guns kill people.


Completely on their own with no human action required, just ask Alec Baldwin.
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13494 posts
Posted on 12/2/21 at 7:56 am to
quote:

We live in a society that treats cars and SUVs differently.

Because the minivan and SUV turned an environmentalist wacko victory into ashes in their mouths.

The government created fuel standards for automobiles that “big gas guzzlers” could not meet. Americans love big cars, and automakers loved their profitability, but tough said the greenie meanies.

But the regulations also eliminated a category of automobile that was necessary for families, the station wagon. Chrysler saw this and developed the minivan on a truck platform and bypassed the car fuel standards.

Eureka! This paved the road for car makers to give back America’s beloved “big gas guzzlers”. SUVs are also trucks! The greenie meanies HATE SUVs!
Posted by Geekboy
Member since Jan 2004
4943 posts
Posted on 12/2/21 at 8:17 am to
Of course not! Are you crazy?
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23683 posts
Posted on 12/2/21 at 8:33 am to
Y'all are defending a school shooter? Can't say I'm surprised considering the lack of mental ability in this thread.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79023 posts
Posted on 12/2/21 at 8:36 am to
quote:

Y'all are defending a school shooter?


Do you even consistency bro?
Posted by Nurbis
Member since May 2020
1320 posts
Posted on 12/2/21 at 8:41 am to
quote:

Y'all are defending a school shooter? Can't say I'm surprised considering the lack of mental ability in this thread.



Is this your best attempt at fake outrage? To fabricate a narrative that doesn't exist anywhere in this thread?

They charged a school shooter with terrorism but did not charge Brooks even though anyone with a brain knows that was a terrorist attack. Your favorite MSM news sources will not even state that Brooks was driving the car, they imply the car was driving itself and that it was simply a crash.

Hell, the guy committed an attack that killed 6 and injured over 60 and he was given bail. That is real-world damage caused by the left and you are whining because people on this board are complaining about the stupidity of it?

I would say you should quit playing stupid but I doubt you are playing.
This post was edited on 12/2/21 at 8:43 am
Posted by Crimson1st
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2010
20201 posts
Posted on 12/2/21 at 8:48 am to
quote:

Y'all are defending a school shooter? Can't say I'm surprised considering the lack of mental ability in this thread.


You haven’t a clue! This might be the dumbest thing I’ve ever seen posted.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
20009 posts
Posted on 12/2/21 at 8:52 am to
quote:

Y'all are defending a school shooter? Can't say I'm surprised considering the lack of mental ability in this thread.



Ironic post
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84066 posts
Posted on 12/2/21 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Y'all are defending a school shooter? Can't say I'm surprised considering the lack of mental ability in this thread.


Imagine making this post while claiming others had a "lack of mental ability"

The point is that a black school shooter was back at home within a fricking day on $75k bail and no terrorism charge. A BLM activist intentionally drove through fricking parade, no terrorism charge. Kyle Rittenhouse clearly acts in self defense, $2 million bail.

I'd say surely you aren't too stupid to not see this obvious shite, but I'm having my doubts.
Posted by LSUROXS
Texas
Member since Sep 2006
7150 posts
Posted on 12/2/21 at 8:58 am to
quote:

Y'all are defending a school shooter? Can't say I'm surprised considering the lack of mental ability in this thread.


Is equal treatment under the law not a thing?
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
34997 posts
Posted on 12/2/21 at 9:21 am to
quote:

Y'all are defending a school shooter? Can't say I'm surprised considering the lack of mental ability in this thread.


Link?

Terrorism requires a political motive. Can you sniff a political motive out of this?

Now, can you sniff out a political motive for the BLM, Anti-Semite, black nationalist, hyper racist?

Here, let me give you the definition of terrorism since you obviously don’t know what it is.

quote:

ter·ror·ism /'ter??riz?m/ Learn to pronounce noun the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims


Posted by tiger1616
Member since May 2020
527 posts
Posted on 12/2/21 at 9:34 am to
quote:

Y'all are defending a school shooter? Can't say I'm surprised considering the lack of mental ability in this thread.


Where TF is anyone defending a school shooter? In my opinion they should both already be 6’ under. I just find it “funny” the shooter was charged with terrorism and the driver wasn’t.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
34997 posts
Posted on 12/2/21 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Where TF is anyone defending a school shooter? In my opinion they should both already be 6’ under.


Yup. Both are ironclad cases where we know 100% for a fact the accused caused the death of several innocent people.

Neither should have been given another day to live. They should both have been executed on the spot with a shot between their evil, beady, eyes.

But somehow, trannyboy thinks that is a defense for the subhuman pile of shite.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35385 posts
Posted on 12/2/21 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Where TF is anyone defending a school shooter? In my opinion they should both already be 6’ under. I just find it “funny” the shooter was charged with terrorism and the driver wasn’t
It was obvious with the school shooter's online countdown and such. There is no evidence to support the charge for the guy who killed all those people in the parade.

Doesn't really matter since neither one is getting out of jail.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram