- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Saw where the Michigan shooter
Posted on 12/2/21 at 10:43 am to beerJeep
Posted on 12/2/21 at 10:43 am to beerJeep
That depends on what the definition of “is “is. 
I bet the point is being made is that evidence has now been scrubbed, so it is no longer considered “ left online.”
I know, I am being too generous with some people. But it does never cease to amaze me how stupid these trolls act.
I bet the point is being made is that evidence has now been scrubbed, so it is no longer considered “ left online.”
I know, I am being too generous with some people. But it does never cease to amaze me how stupid these trolls act.
0
Posted on 12/2/21 at 12:39 pm to beerJeep
quote:
Terrorism requires a political motive. Can you sniff a political motive out of this?
bullshite. There’s absolutely no requirement in the Michigan anti-terrorism law that requires an overt political motive. The school shooter is a mass murderer who was certainly trying to terrorize a lot of people.
The same goes for the parade driver. Who cares if he is a political operative or just a garden variety mass murderer? He was clearly using violence to terrorize a lot of people. But of course he was in Wisconsin so he couldn’t be charged inder the Michigan law.
Everyone of y’all arguing for lesser charges for the school mass murderer needs to go check yourselves into the psych ward because y’all are farking nuts.
This post was edited on 12/2/21 at 12:42 pm
Posted on 12/2/21 at 1:02 pm to beerJeep
quote:
But be honest with yourself dude
For a leftist this is akin to dividing by zero!
Posted on 12/2/21 at 1:20 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
mmcgrath
quote:
Tboy
frick both of you pussy arse liberals.
This country would be FAR better without people like you in it, so either please suck start a shotgun, or just fricking leave.
You hate this country and what it stands for. You hate the people who actually love it here, so why not just leave? Go to one of these communist countries that you fricking love so much. I hear China’s great this time of year. Go check it out
I’ve gotten rid of the few idiots in my life who think the way y’all do and I have zero qualms about it. People like you aren’t worth the air they breathe or the space they take up. I wouldn’t fricking blink if all the libs in this country fell into the grand canyon tomorrow
This post was edited on 12/2/21 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 12/2/21 at 1:23 pm to TBoy
quote:
TBoy
Suck my red, white, and blue cock you communist piece of shite. frick you and mcgrath
Pussy arse bitch.
Posted on 12/2/21 at 1:58 pm to TBoy
quote:
Everyone of y’all arguing for lesser charges for the school mass murderer needs to go check yourselves into the psych ward because y’all are farking nuts.
I said he should have a bullet put between his eyes the second he was taken into custody.
Eat shite, scumbag.
The word terrorism USED to have a meaning. Now you leftist just throw it out randomly. Just like the word racist.
The word means nothing now.
It truly is amazing how willfully dishonest you are.
This post was edited on 12/2/21 at 2:01 pm
Posted on 12/2/21 at 2:05 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
There is no evidence to support the charge for the guy who killed all those people in the parade.
You're wrong about this. It was all over his social media accounts before it was scrubbed. I'm sure it's been saved somewhere. He talked about being in a war white people and literally "running them over".
Posted on 12/2/21 at 2:13 pm to beerJeep
Keep defending the mass murderers. you people are so farked up you will defend any mass murderer that you can twist in your mind as somehow being in your tribe.
Why do you care whether Michigan enacts a criminal law that makes it a felony called "terrorizing" that doesn't have a political requirement? You just want to reduce the charges against a school mass murder. Farking psycho.
Why do you care whether Michigan enacts a criminal law that makes it a felony called "terrorizing" that doesn't have a political requirement? You just want to reduce the charges against a school mass murder. Farking psycho.
Posted on 12/2/21 at 2:15 pm to TBoy
Far left wingers like yourself are mentally ill
Posted on 12/2/21 at 2:16 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Far left wingers like yourself are mentally ill
I'm not surprised you would jump into a thread that is arguing against criminal charges for a mass murderer. Is he in your tribe too?
Posted on 12/2/21 at 2:25 pm to TBoy
You just keep proving me right
You have issues mentally
You have issues mentally
Posted on 12/2/21 at 2:27 pm to TheRouxGuru
quote:
frick both of you pussy arse liberals.
This country would be FAR better without people like you in it, so either please suck start a shotgun, or just fricking leave.
You hate this country and what it stands for. You hate the people who actually love it here, so why not just leave? Go to one of these communist countries that you fricking love so much. I hear China’s great this time of year. Go check it out
I’ve gotten rid of the few idiots in my life who think the way y’all do and I have zero qualms about it. People like you aren’t worth the air they breathe or the space they take up. I wouldn’t fricking blink if all the libs in this country fell into the grand canyon tomorrow
Posted on 12/2/21 at 2:29 pm to TBoy
quote:
Keep defending the mass murderers.
By saying he should have been killed and deserves death?
you have a weird definition of defending him. quote:
you people are so farked up you will defend any mass murderer that you can twist in your mind as somehow being in your tribe.
Link?
quote:
Why do you care whether Michigan enacts a criminal law that makes it a felony called "terrorizing" that doesn't have a political requirement?
Because TERRORISM has a set definition. You cannot change the definition of the word just because you’re an emotional twat.
quote:
You just want to reduce the charges against a school mass murder. Farking psycho.
you are brain dead. Ps. Are you afraid of the word “frick”? Does your bull take your tv away if you say no no words?
This post was edited on 12/2/21 at 2:36 pm
Posted on 12/2/21 at 2:37 pm to mmcgrath
quote:.
It was obvious with the school shooter's online countdown and such. There is no evidence to support the charge for the guy who killed all those people in the parade
What was the school shooter’s obvious political motive?
Posted on 12/2/21 at 2:55 pm to Nurbis
quote:
They charged a school shooter with terrorism but did not charge Brooks even though anyone with a brain knows that was a terrorist attack.
michigan has state level terrorism laws, wisconsin does not
quote:
Michigan has a state-level terrorism law; Wisconsin does not.
As such, Crumbley now faces a Michigan state terrorism charge. Brook’s Wisconsin state charges invoke no element of terrorism.
Fox News
Posted on 12/2/21 at 3:09 pm to TBoy
quote:
I'm not surprised you would jump into a thread that is arguing against criminal charges for a mass murderer. Is he in your tribe too?
No one in this thread is arguing in support of a mass murderer. They are arguing at the unequal application of the law in comparison of the accused
Posted on 12/2/21 at 3:38 pm to TBoy
quote:
Keep defending the mass murderers. you people are so farked up you will defend any mass murderer that you can twist in your mind as somehow being in your tribe.
You are fricking ignorant
Posted on 12/2/21 at 4:20 pm to TBoy
quote:
Everyone of y’all arguing for lesser charges for the school mass murderer
I think I must have missed this part, can you show us where someone argued for lesser charges for the school shooter?
Posted on 12/2/21 at 4:21 pm to TS1926
quote:
No one in this thread is arguing in support of a mass murderer. They are arguing at the unequal application of the law in comparison of the accused
It isn't "unequal," they committed crimes in different states. Different states have different laws.
Which mass murderer do you think is getting the short end of the stick?
Posted on 12/2/21 at 4:36 pm to TBoy
Which poster is defending the scumbag pile of shite?
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News