Started By
Message

re: Sanders, set to run social security policy, says he plans to increase benefits by $2400

Posted on 11/8/26 at 5:58 pm to
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
144020 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 5:58 pm to
Yes, but all govt pensions need to be eliminated, and them moved to a 401k type plan only.
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
25716 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

you greatly reduced the money that goes into funding programs for deadbeats like medicaid and welfare

SS and these programs are funded in an entirely different way.
But you may be right. Who knows how much SS has been used for deadbeat programs? But our income tax ought to be paying these deadbeat programs.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
173891 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 6:04 pm to
Bernbots became trumpocrats then fuentesbots.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
177134 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 6:06 pm to
$2400 a year. I thought when I clicked on this it was going to say a month.

2400 a year is a pittance.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
15105 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 6:06 pm to
quote:


DEMANDING the rich pay their fair share.


Millionaires (Bernie) to Millionaires (ME) Assistance Program
Posted by Shorter Yards
Here and There
Member since Jun 2020
1025 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

Yes, but all govt pensions need to be eliminated, and them moved to a 401k type plan only.


Government pensions rely on the retirement, TSP and SS.
Posted by latigerfan2
covington, la
Member since Jan 2005
2205 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 6:11 pm to
The problem is that the money collected through FICA doesn’t go into a designated fund for SS. It goes into a big pot that the politicians can steal from and use to buy votes through other programs. Social Security should have been set up like a 401K where each person that contributed got their own personal account.
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
34619 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

every baby boomer is now eligible for SS. The cutoff year is 1964. SS eligibility starts at age 62. youngest ones are 62 this year

This is the thinking that brought us Tuesdays election result

Anyone that retires at 62 takes a 30% benefit reduction. So No, few are retiring at 62. Therefore, 1958 is the year that people can take full retirement. That means its 6 more years before all boomers will claim their SS
Posted by Trevaylin
south texas
Member since Feb 2019
11909 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 6:15 pm to
educate me what are we talking about for gov employees?
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
64588 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 6:15 pm to
$2,400 to SS recipients is nothing compared to $5,000 to every citizen.
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
34619 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

Congrats to the boomers, you will continue to keep ripping off the country.

What country? You guys just voted to turn all our governing systems over to the communists

Fantastic move. As if groceries and gas, insurance, and housing prices will suddenly return to 2016 levels.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
75183 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 6:17 pm to
quote:

2400 a year is a pittance.


Social security is set to run out because it already pays out far more in benefits to retired people than those retired people paid in

Now you want to increase benefits for not reason?
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
51109 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 6:18 pm to
Soros, Gates etc.. aren't ever the targets. Elon and his ilk are always the unspoken intent of this stuff.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
15105 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 6:20 pm to
quote:

$2,400 to SS recipients is nothing compared to $5,000 to every citizen.


One is HAPPENING, one is NOT.

Try something else. Get your arse up tomorrow and go to work for my fricking money.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
64588 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 6:21 pm to
quote:

So In think the limit for SS deductions is $192,000. Social Security needs to be fixed. What's wrong with a payroll tax for SS say up to $400,000?
Nothing if you uncap benefits too.

Does demonstrate the idea that SS is “my money” is long ago dead (it was always just a myth)
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
64588 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

Or, answering my own post, all earners and employers pay an additional 2% or an increase of 4%. AI says
Stop being a meat proxy. The employee always pays 100% of FICA taxes.
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
50474 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 6:23 pm to
quote:


DEMANDING the rich pay their fair share.




Oh the ole fair share. They never say what a fair share is?

Who gets to decide that?
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
15105 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

Does demonstrate the idea that SS is “my money” is long ago dead (it was always just a myth)


The money I collect the Wednesday after this one will be my money.

Call LaKeisha or your local equivalent to stop ne from getting it.
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
25716 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

The problem is that the money collected through FICA doesn’t go into a designated fund for SS. It goes into a big pot that the politicians can steal from and use to buy votes through other programs. Social Security should have been set up like a 401K where each person that contributed got their own personal account.


Yes, I know that. Sanders and Warren want to tack on another 12.4% tax on investment income. They know that few reach that income level in retirement. For my wife and I this would double or SS income. But we give it all back in the tax. So my addition tax would be essentially be similar to my increase early on. Over time as the RMD gets larger, I would pay an increasing amount of tax. But those on the lower end would have more "security" without the tax. Without looking at hard numbers, this would not kill me. And I wouldn't have to listen to the youth of America bitch about it.
I'm surprising no Republican looked at this seriously.
Next, Sanders will tell me what my new Federal tax brackets will look like.
This post was edited on 11/8/26 at 6:34 pm
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
64588 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

One is HAPPENING, one is NOT.
Unlikely either are happening. But the difference in reactions is what in interesting.

quote:

Get your arse up tomorrow and go to work for my fricking money.
got any more fan fiction?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram