Started By
Message

re: Russia's Lavrov: If Euro Troops enter Ukraine, NATO will fight Russia Directly

Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:56 am to
Posted by TigerNAtux
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2007
18624 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:56 am to
Yeah. Time to leave NATO.

Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
40237 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:57 am to
It's an accurate summary but the Russia bots here won't like it. Putin is the only one telling the truth and everyone else is being mean trying to protect Ukraine from him.

Posted by Grumpy Nemesis
Member since Feb 2025
2033 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:59 am to
quote:

Russia: "It is perfectly acceptable for Russian troops to invade Ukraine, but unacceptable for Polish troops to help defend it."
what exactly is your point? It really doesn't matter whether it's right or wrong. Reality is what matters. I think people have gotten so used to arguing on the internet that they don't realize the real world doesn't work that way. It doesn't matter how many people in the world wag their finger at Russia. If Russia says European troops in Ukraine means direct European Russian conflict than all of the hand ringing about whether or not that's fair really doesn't fricking matter
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
51893 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:00 am to
quote:

I was getting tired of going to work every day, anyway.
I highly recommend retirement. Just the lack of daily stress itself is amazing and worth it.
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
12402 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:05 am to
quote:

It's an accurate summary but the Russia bots here won't like it. Putin is the only one telling the truth and everyone else is being mean trying to protect Ukraine from him.


No. I fear those warmongers in Europe won’t fall for the 5 step plan.

1. Develop nukes
2. Invade another country
3. Gaslight America into believing the country you invaded is to blame
4. Threaten to use nukes if counter attack happens
5. Repeat as desired
Posted by Tandemjay
Member since Jun 2022
4639 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:06 am to
quote:

And the nukes will rain.


I don't think that will happen. Trump will let the Europeans learn the hard way. Russia doesn't need launch nukes, all they have to do is pull their oil and gas off the market until NATO troops leave the Ukraine. It will take less than a week with 200-300 oil and the world forcing the warmongers to accept peace.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
22594 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:10 am to
quote:

but then you have guys like Anne Applebaum's husband working for the neocons.


The immigrant push is starting, they’re building integration centers. It will just take them a while to wear down the public.

They’ll do to the Poles what they did the the English, the French, and the Germans
Posted by LARancher1991
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2015
2253 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:26 am to
I gotta learn to quit using sarcasm on this site.
Posted by Old Money
LSU
Member since Sep 2012
41799 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:32 am to
quote:

Putin is the only one telling the truth and everyone else is being mean trying to protect Ukraine from him.


I thought it was funny at first, now it's just sad. ex-KGB propaganda is truly the best there is. Any place USSR/Russia has influenced or touched is an absolute fricking shithole.
Posted by Paytonisablowhard
Member since Feb 2024
1187 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:42 am to
quote:

Good god you’re stupid


I've seen a lot of this guys post, I believe he has his direct deposit set up to Zelensky's bank account
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
38053 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 11:00 am to
quote:

this is where i stand. frick russia and ukraine but at this point, ukraine and the globalist are worse imo

I wish LSURussian would find a way to grasp this, instead of continuously calling us "Putin fanbois".

frick Putin and Russia. But also frick the globalist puppet Zelenskyy who is working with EU leaders to try and goad mutually assured thermonuclear destruction. As it stands, our best choice by far is neutrality and to broker an amicable peace deal.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37616 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 11:05 am to
Since you are so scared of Putin's nukes, do we then give him free reign in say....the Baltic for arguments sake. Or say he goes and overruns Ukraine as a result of your nuclear fears and then points weapons at Romania? Do you just lie down because he has nukes? That seems to be what you suggest.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 11:09 am to
quote:

Since you are so scared of Putin's nukes, do we then give him free reign in say....the Baltic for arguments sake.
I cannot decide whether this is a homophone error or very clever wordplay about Putin's imperial aspirations.
Posted by Roll Tide Ravens
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2015
51735 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 11:11 am to
quote:

Russia: "It is perfectly acceptable for Russian troops to invade Ukraine, but unacceptable for Polish troops to help defend it."

I don’t think that it was “acceptable” or “right” for Russia to invade Ukraine, but if NATO countries start putting boots on the ground in Ukraine then the door is wide open for war between NATO countries and Russia, which will drag the U.S. into a war.
This post was edited on 3/6/25 at 11:12 am
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14684 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 11:15 am to
quote:

I cannot decide whether this is a homophone error or very clever wordplay about Putin's imperial aspirations.


That's because you are purposefully stupid. When someone says "free" in front of "reign" all the normal people just assume that the writer meant "free rein", meaning the freedom to do as they wish.

Newsflash for Hanky: When you are stupid on purpose, people still just think you're stupid.
This post was edited on 3/6/25 at 11:17 am
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 11:17 am to
Troy, I understand that politeness is just not a concept with which you have much familiarity, but I was giving him the benefit of the doubt ... because the use of "reign" regarding Putin in this context would indeed have been quite clever wordplay ... like a double entendre without the bawdiness.
This post was edited on 3/6/25 at 11:23 am
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14684 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 11:24 am to
Nobody believes for one second that politeness was the motive behind your post, Hanky. Pointing out grammar or syntax errors of others give you some kind of superiority points for yourself in some game inside your small, small mind.

And FTR, I have quite polite discussions and debates with several people here. It is simply not reserved for you, due to your jacked up personality as displayed beautifully here.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 11:27 am to
quote:

FTR, I have quite polite discussions and debates with several people here.
Of course you do, Troy.

You are unfailingly polite to people who agree with you.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47624 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 11:27 am to
NO NO NO! The board lefties assured us that NATO troops fighting in Ukraine isnt an indirect declaration of war by NATOs members against Russia.
This post was edited on 3/6/25 at 11:30 am
Posted by dickkellog
little rock
Member since Dec 2024
2970 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

Since you are so scared of Putin's nukes, do we then give him free reign in say....the Baltic for arguments sake.


yeah we probably do since those countries are all historically russian anyway and it was a dumb idea for bush to put them in NATO to begin with. bush had a lot of dumb ideas, like the one that everybody should own a home whether or not they could afford one. which collapsed the housing market and shortly after the banks but the middle class all got stimulus checks so it was all ok.

that's the UNIPARTY play book we careen from one catastrophe to another and then the middle class gets stimulus checks.

hey look on the bright side maybe my 401k will be worthless again! since i'm just 63 i probably won't need that money.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram