- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Republicans turned out in Georgia.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 4:52 am
Posted on 12/7/22 at 4:52 am
quote:
LINK
Since the link won’t work.
ATLANTA — It's a race to settle the last U.S. Senate seat - and it turns out around 80,000 Georgia voters who didn't chime in during the general election decided to sound off in the runoff.
You figure it out. Why did 80,000 more people vote in the run off than the general? (He lost by 90,000)
Why was there an increase of 30% mail in ballots and 10% increase, in early voting?
Even with the huge increase of votes for Warnock. Walker lost by 1% or 90,000.
Republicans showed up. They were defeated by a 100,000 increase for Warnock.
These are hard facts. You draw your own conclusion.
This post was edited on 12/7/22 at 5:10 am
Posted on 12/7/22 at 4:57 am to dos crystal
Only problem was more Democrats showed up also. Republicans need to learn to vote early so they don't get passed up so easily when those votes start getting counted.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 5:07 am to dos crystal
America wants to be a communist country, that’s the truth of it
Posted on 12/7/22 at 5:24 am to dos crystal
quote:
Why did 80,000 more people vote in the run off than the general?
150k more voted for john bel edwards in the runoff compared to the primary for comparison
Posted on 12/7/22 at 5:30 am to dos crystal
Some Republicans/Conservatives need to learn to hold their nose and quit being little bitches!
Posted on 12/7/22 at 5:32 am to dos crystal
Same thing in Louisiana.
Democrats will support their candidate no matter how bad they are.
Republicans will not.
This is how Louisiana got JBE as Governor.
All democrats have to do it out a wedge between the republican and they win.
Republicans are too stupid to see this.
Democrats will support their candidate no matter how bad they are.
Republicans will not.
This is how Louisiana got JBE as Governor.
All democrats have to do it out a wedge between the republican and they win.
Republicans are too stupid to see this.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 5:50 am to johnnyrocket
Exactly it’s stupid fricks that keep driving the wedge not only in Louisiana but look at all the threads on Trump.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 5:59 am to burke985
quote:This except it's socialism and living off of the government tit. The majority now wants it and we are doomed.
America wants to be a communist country, that’s the truth of it
Posted on 12/7/22 at 6:22 am to choupiquesushi
Then I guess I'll be doomed with my Henry 30-30 in my hands.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 6:28 am to demtigers73
quote:
Some Republicans/Conservatives need to learn to hold their nose and quit being little bitches!
Wrong. Stop running shitty candidates.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 6:36 am to dos crystal
The same formula will be used to beat BOTH Desantis or Trump in two years. Cant stop it.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 6:36 am to Aubie Spr96
quote:The Dems don’t run good candidates. They run terrible candidates. Warnock was a terrible candidate. The Dems don’t care about the quality of their candidates because they cheat, they steal, they manipulate, they lie, and they destroy in any way they need to to get the result they want. The candidate is meaningless to the Dems because they all get their marching orders from D.C. anyway.
Wrong. Stop running shitty candidates
It’s not the candidate. It’s the inability to compete in the realm of public opinion and the lack of ability to manipulate people and results that are missing from the Republicans.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 6:41 am to johnnyrocket
quote:
Democrats will support their candidate no matter how bad they are.
Republicans will not.
This has been and will continue to be Conservatives problem with elections.
They haven't accepted the fact that you have to WIN elections before you can change anything.
And they do not understand like the Democrats do that a BAD candidate for their party is far better than any candidate for the other party.
This is why they lose consistently in key races.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 6:44 am to dos crystal
This makes absolutely zero sense historically. Dems never turn out in the midterms much less a midterm runoff.
Only difference is mail in ballots.
Only difference is mail in ballots.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 6:49 am to dos crystal
I would have held my nose and voted for Walker but jfc what a shitty candidate.
Seriously that’s the best the GA can do?!?
The reality is that people will tolerate lots of things in the prospective political choices but being functionally retarded is last on the list.
Seriously that’s the best the GA can do?!?
The reality is that people will tolerate lots of things in the prospective political choices but being functionally retarded is last on the list.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 6:54 am to johnnyrocket
quote:
Democrats will support their candidate no matter how bad they are.
Republicans will not.
Democrats are more committed to winning than Republicans and it shows.
It seems like quality of candidate matters more on the Republican side. Democrats have figured out that once you get to a general election, you vote for the party, not the person. You vote for the person during primaries.
This post was edited on 12/7/22 at 6:57 am
Posted on 12/7/22 at 6:57 am to VADawg
quote:
Democrats are more committed to winning than Republicans and it shows.
Democrats are power hungry people. It’s why they are democrats. It’s baked into who they are as leftists.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 6:59 am to dos crystal
Look Kemp won convincingly
Walker was a bad candidate if Perdue would have got the nomination he would have won in the general w/ over 50% and there would have been no run off.
Walker was a terrible candidate, I think the republican party needs to be happy they kept it so close " moral victory" a better candidate would have won in Pennsylvania.
The 2 people with name recognition lost over Politicians. With DNC and big money support
Warnock had spent 286m in the general and runoff walker spent 48m
Walker was a bad candidate if Perdue would have got the nomination he would have won in the general w/ over 50% and there would have been no run off.
Walker was a terrible candidate, I think the republican party needs to be happy they kept it so close " moral victory" a better candidate would have won in Pennsylvania.
The 2 people with name recognition lost over Politicians. With DNC and big money support
Warnock had spent 286m in the general and runoff walker spent 48m
Popular
Back to top

19








