- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/25/26 at 3:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
What again is the bad plan that you are talking about?
Posted on 1/25/26 at 3:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You may not like it being the answer to your question, but it's certainly relevant.
I love the answer, but it’s still wrong. Try again.
Big or small, the circus would be in Minnesota, so what is the issue here?
Posted on 1/25/26 at 3:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What does a bunch of people here legally (most being citizens) have to do with discussing efficient policy on detailing illegal immigrants?
Because they’re a 3rd world welfare class that is here for no other reason than we give them money and benefits. And that is the future of what are currently illegals if you allow this to continue.
But I’m also curious as to which other laws you think states should be able to tell the feds to pound sand on?
Posted on 1/25/26 at 3:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The plan was bad from the start. Doubling down is how you get into that Iraq/Afghanistan situation. At some point we have to admit it was a bad plan
What if the elected officials weren’t encouraging citizens to disrupt federal officers’ duties? Would it have been a bad plan then?
Posted on 1/25/26 at 3:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Can there be more than one "largest"?
Does it really matter which is the “largest”? Negative. They were going to do this regardless.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 3:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
We see how the polling is going now
Polling
quote:
My strategy is based off data
Polling.
Tell me more about polling as it relates to Trump being elected / re-elected.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 3:27 pm to FLTech
quote:
What again is the bad plan that you are talking about?
To promote a policy of maximizing detentions and deportations?
Posted on 1/25/26 at 3:27 pm to PurpleSingularity
quote:
What if the elected officials weren’t encouraging citizens to disrupt federal officers’ duties?
Slow doesn’t think this is happening. .
Posted on 1/25/26 at 3:28 pm to G2160
quote:
Because they’re a 3rd world welfare class that is here for no other reason than we give them money and benefits. And that is the future of what are currently illegals if you allow this to continue.
But they are largely not illegal and didn't come here illegally.
Again, how is bringing them up relevant to a discussion about detaining and deporting illegal immigrants?
Posted on 1/25/26 at 3:28 pm to PurpleSingularity
quote:
What if the elected officials weren’t encouraging citizens to disrupt federal officers’ duties?
Then it would have been a better strategy.
But it was clear they would, which affects the evaluation of the strategy.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 3:29 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Slow doesn’t think this is happening. .
That's a lie. The problem is this isn't exclusive to MN
This post was edited on 1/25/26 at 3:29 pm
Posted on 1/25/26 at 3:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
Everything is irrelevant!
Except what SlowRelevantPro says is relevant!
Except what SlowRelevantPro says is relevant!
Posted on 1/25/26 at 3:29 pm to burger bearcat
quote:maybe arrest them for that instead of retreating?
if the mayor and governor are gonna be put ICE officials in harm's way a
Posted on 1/25/26 at 3:30 pm to burger bearcat
If they pull ICE out now then it was all for nothing and the leftys will pull this shite everywhere.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 3:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
But it was clear they would, which affects the evaluation of the strategy.
How?
"You know, if we do this, then Gov Walz and others will tell their citizens to oppose us."
"Yeah, that's right, so let's not do it."
"Okay."
"What else should we not do because some nutcase Democrat might tell their citizens to oppose us?"
Posted on 1/25/26 at 3:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
But it was clear they would
Oh, you finally got to the answer to the question. Congrats!
Posted on 1/25/26 at 3:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The problem is this isn't exclusive to MN
The citizens of Minnesota are acting different. Very aggressive messaging from their leaders. Very aggressive resistance. Very organized. Other cities are not acting like these circus animals.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 3:39 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:
How?
Well the question is, is your policy goal maximizing detentions and deportations or something else?
Posted on 1/25/26 at 3:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Enacting a strategy to minimize negative externalities is not "fear". It's called being intelligent.
Yes, that’s why your style of Republicanism had been so wildly successful in the post-Reagan age.
But you keep on sniffing your own farts and telling yourself that good sir.
At least one person is buying it….yourself.
Page 6 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News