Started By
Message

re: Renee Good had 4 gunshot wounds: 2 in chest; 1 in forearm; 1 in left side of head.

Posted on 1/17/26 at 9:06 pm to
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
30152 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 9:06 pm to
This was one of the cleanest shoots of all time.

I have no idea why it’s still such a huge story. I never gloat anyone’s death but she got what she deserved based on her own choices and I don’t feel bad for her
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128846 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

I have no idea why it’s still such a huge story.


Sure you do.
1) it’s an election year
2) It was an ICE operation
3) she’s a lesbo
4) the other leading stories weren’t great for the Marxists
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
30152 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 9:11 pm to
Yeah most of that is true.

What made me totally just… bewildered was the footage of her passenger yelling “Why did you have real bullets” after her friend got turned into Swiss cheese.

What the hell do these people think is going to happen?
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
16658 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

I’m sure you said the same thing when Ashley Babbit was killed.

Why would the same thing be said when the decisions were not the same?

Babbit did not use any objects against an officer (or brandish any) that could cause serious bodily injury or death. No reasonable person would perceive the clearly unarmed Babbit as a lethal threat. Her empty hands were in plain view in front of her body when she was shot.

Renee Good reversed her vehicle while turning which put an officer in front of her vehicle. She accelerated toward the officer so abruptly that her tires can be seen spinning while pointing in the direction of the officer. As the tires began to grip the road her vehicle hit the officer in the chest as she began turning her steering wheel. No reasonable person thinks hitting a person with your 4000 pound vehicle does not represent a threat of at least serious bodily injury and possibly death.
Posted by Jugbow
Member since Nov 2025
3592 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 9:12 pm to
The wife agitator said she shouldn’t have taken her there after she got shot. They’re idiots and got what they deserved. FAFO
Posted by MizzouBS
Missouri
Member since Dec 2014
6886 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

A well-trained officer would at least try to de-escalate the situation

quote:

They did genius. Did you miss that part?

What she did was wrong and made a mistake that got her killed.

He was not one of the officer’s trying to de-escalate. He was in front of the vehicle and the only one with his gun drawn.

He was standing in a spot where officers are trained not to be in that situation. Officers are trained not to stand in front or behind a vehicle that is running.

I don’t see anything he did that was criminal, but there will be a civil case against ICE officer training. Johnathan Ross was dragged after a stop in June because he put his arm inside the vehicle. In training officers are trained not to put their arms inside running cars and Ross made that mistake.

He is definitely not a well trained officer
This post was edited on 1/17/26 at 9:14 pm
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
41748 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

have no idea why it’s still such a huge story.


Goes to show you the commies still have major influence
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
49699 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 9:24 pm to
What is the point of this post? Am I supposed to care?
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
16658 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 9:27 pm to
quote:

He was standing in a spot where officers are trained not to be in that situation. Officers are trained not to stand in front or behind a vehicle that is running.

Policy language like "should avoid" reflects administrative guidance, not criminal or constitutional mandates. Officers are not criminally liable solely for violating a "should". What matters legally is whether their conduct was reasonable under the circumstances, including imminent threats and reaction time.

The video still shows the officer assessed the scene while recording fellow officers on the opposite side, a previously cooperative driver, and a short distance to maintain visual contact. The officer's choices could quite obviously be seen as a tactical assessment, not reckless disregard, particularly when the situation escalated unpredictably. Using a camera to document events does not automatically excuse unsafe positioning, but it also doesn't render a use of force decision unreasonable.

DHS policy does not require officers to guarantee zero risk, it requires reasonable avoidance. Considering the presence of other unknown instigators/protesters, the positioning of his fellow officers, and the driver's recent behavior, the officer's decision to cross in front of the vehicle can be viewed as a reasonable risk to complete an objective.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10132 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 9:31 pm to
quote:

What is the point of this post? Am I supposed to care?


To provide details for people who are interested in them. Prior to this, the reports said she was "shot in the face." Turns out that wasn't true.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
41748 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

He was not one of the officer’s trying to de-escalate. He was in front of the vehicle and the only one with his gun drawn.


He was essentially cover for the other officers.

As soon as she showed signs of defiant escalation, it made sense for him get ready to defend himself and others.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10132 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

My friend trains ICE and BP in shooting.


This really was impressive. Never dropped his phone in his left hand. All of his shots hit their moving target.
Posted by Turnblad85
Member since Sep 2022
5565 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

vigilanti justice still being illegal in 2026 is some serious context to exclude



We agree on that
Posted by jammajin
Member since Jul 2024
2002 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 10:17 pm to
“This really was impressive. Never dropped his phone in his left hand. All of his shots hit their moving target.”


This is actually the whole story that you posted. The rest is just rehashing of the BS we’ve been hearing since it started and was made irrelevant by the video especially of him getting hit.

The fact that he was 4-4 in the situation she placed both of them in is extremely impressive.

The fact that he was x-4 (got off 4 shots) from the time she started toward him until her window was past is just as impressive.

He has a lot of experience and has been well trained. He knows how to fire until a target is neutralized. And his training paid off in this situation

Those who keep arm chair quarterbacking the situation she caused here have no idea how impressive this is. Because they would have never even reacted to her first move, they just would have been a shite stain under her left front wheel. To think they are questioning the judgement of a guy who decided and acted to this degree in this time frame is laughable.

It’s unfortunate she’s dead. It’s unfortunate she thought this was all just make believe TV reality until her brains ended up in the back seat in short order.
This post was edited on 1/17/26 at 10:20 pm
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14944 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 10:23 pm to
Just wondering. If she was trying to run him over, why did she turn the wheel?
Posted by homesicktiger
High altitude hell
Member since Oct 2004
1615 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 10:27 pm to
quote:

Just wondering. If she was trying to run him over, why did she turn the wheel?


She wasn't trying. She was doing. And, she turned the wheel because she wanted to get away after her vehicular assault.
Posted by somethingdifferent
Member since Aug 2024
1940 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 10:45 pm to
quote:

I’m sure you said the same thing when Ashley Babbit was killed
The most obvious difference being that Capitol police ushered people into the Capitol. Good was obstructing
Posted by somethingdifferent
Member since Aug 2024
1940 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 10:46 pm to
quote:

Especially considering the agent was shooting from the side after he was out of danger
This is still factually incorrect and in the end, irrelevant
Posted by somethingdifferent
Member since Aug 2024
1940 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 10:49 pm to
quote:

He was not one of the officer’s trying to de-escalate
So? She could have gotten out of the vehicle like she was ordered to do

quote:

He was in front of the vehicle and the only one with his gun drawn
So? And I don't recall him having it "drawn" on her prior to accelerating

quote:

He was standing in a spot where officers are trained not to be in that situation
He wasn't "standing." He was circling the vehicle
Posted by Athis
I AM Charlie Kirk....
Member since Aug 2016
16439 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 10:50 pm to
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram