User Avatar

somethingdifferent

Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1710
Registered on:8/18/2024
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
You are of course expertly summarizing the classical geophyiscs rebuttal to "State 2." However, the classical rebuttal relies on the assumption that Earth’s internal state is static, whereas the latest data suggests it is dynamic and accelerating.

The primary "alarming" data point involves the IERS Bulletin A plots. Recent observations show a "tightening" of the Chandler Wobble which could be the mantle's density blobs (LLVPs) pulling the crust out of its stable orbit because the magnetic field can no longer dampen the rotational torque.

The NGS replacement of the NAD 83 and NAVD 88 datums officially revealed that the old "stable" coordinate system for North America was misaligned with the Earth's center by over 2 meters. It could be that the reason we need to shift our entire coordinate system by up to 4 meters in 2026 is that the physical ground is no longer where the satellites say it should be.

Jiang confirmed that the Sun's northern polar field is at its weakest level in over 50 years and is expected to decline sharply until March 2026 which might affect the Birkeland current. If the Sun's magnetic "grip" on the Earth's core weakens simultaneously with the Earth's own field failure, the "State 2" transition becomes inevitable.

There's no question that these assertions haven't gained significant public traction yet but that may largely be because the data isn't yet conclusive. Until the data is conclusive, there's no reason to say one way or the other
quote:

Basic geological knowledge says different
Not according to some scientists
quote:

The arrests were already made
Um, you must not be following the scope of the story. There are apparently many many more leading all the way up to the governor. You're acting like this story is already over and "hoodwinked" people are just finding out about, which is not true at all
quote:

All of them are the psyop that's been done on YOU!
So some shadowy organization at least partially tied to the govt intentionally started a fraud scheme, what, 10 years ago, and then had Shirley blow up the story on social media to prove that they can control what people watch and how exposed they are to events? Do you know what a "psyop" is? What you're saying makes absolutely no sense

quote:

Both hoodwinked. Both too stupid to realize it
:confused: So these 2 hypothetical people become exposed to a massive fraud scheme and that's bad? They've been "fooled" somehow?
quote:

The public has been knowing about it
Not nearly to the degree that it's known now. So, Shirley's story is absolutely beneficial

quote:

This is red meat thrown to you to make some memes and shite
:confused: Again, how is more people being exposed to this somehow bad? You haven't answered the question

quote:

It's actually beautiful to see
I totally agree. People are upset. Rightfully so
quote:

Back in January 2020 the fraud was exposed and the feds have been arresting and filing indictments against people and this is the first time you're hearing about it. When the guy went there last week
How is this a problem or a bad thing? Now the public is becoming aware of the same situation in WA and OH which is beneficial. Is there supposed to be a limit on the degree to which fraud is reported on?
quote:

Nine of the Minnesota child care centers
9? The Washington state story alleged 539 centers that list Somali as their primary language. I think we're talking way way way more than "9"

People are complaining about Shirley but when you go to an address that's receiving federal money and there's no building there or it's a residential house...

When a daycare submits an application for federal money based on having served 18 million meals to children...

When storefronts and "sites" claimed to be serving 6,000 meals a day in a town with a total population (adults and children combined) of only 3,000 people...

Nick Shirley isn't the problem no matter how much SFP whines about it
quote:

That’s not how any of this works
It has already been stated that there are alternative viewpoints. The data isn't conclusive right now but it's definitely something that's possible
quote:

Who the frick are these people supposed to be and why should I care about them?
Feel free to investigate on your own. People are getting bent out of shape for the wrong reason. A person looked at some data from NOAA and IERS and make an extrapolation. He apparently showed his mathematical calculations. Yes, there are alternative viewpoints. It's either going to happen or not. We don't know right now. We should have a much clearer picture by June. If the data is an anamoly, stand down from red alert. Otherwise, get your earthly affairs in order because we're about to experience turbulence
quote:

If you want this taken seriously (and I mean really seriously), here’s what would be required:
1. Persistence over 6–12 months
2. Agreement across:
• IERS C04
• Independent VLBI solutions
• LOD anomalies
3. A physical mechanism, not just curve-fitting
4. Error analysis showing this is not endpoint bias
5. Demonstration that previous Chandler collapses are qualitatively different
Excellent overview. We'll apparently have a good idea by June but could know sooner

quote:

Now it’s time to slow the inference down to match the physics
I think this is why most physicists are in a wait and see mode. The data will paint the picture
quote:

I am going to need a 140IQ person to explain how Orlando is above sea level and Vail ski resort is under water?
Because if the Earth's core decouples, elevations will change all over the world. Just because something is at 7k feet today, doesn't mean it will stay that way
quote:

This is just some half-assed flat earther type stuff
Definitely not true. It may not happen but it's not fear mongering
quote:

tinfoil hat stuff
It's definitely not a conspiracy theory. It's just an acknowledgement of something that could happen based on data we currently have. If GPS locations start wandering by June, we know something's up
quote:

You're the worst kind of phony. Start a topic with a bunch of SME jargon and then refuse to synthesize it for people because you likely can't but don't want to admit it. So we just get the condescending "figure it out" bullshite
This is a terrible take. He just presented info that's out there. You can ignore it or learn more about it.
quote:

Ethical skeptic is a clown
He's not the only person saying this; Ben Davidson, Chan Thomas, Charles Hapgood. Others are in a wait and see mode, watching the data. There's nothing to say right now. The data will let us know by June. It could be nothing, it could be the end of civilization. It won't likely be the end of humanity. Worst case scenario will definitely be dystopian
quote:

So, in the instance of Earth, every one of the Dzhanibekov conditions is violated. i.e., No ECDO event
The rebuttal is Core-Mantle Decoupling. If the magnetic field fails, the crust and mantle become "free" from the core. Even if the whole Earth isn't intermediate-axis unstable, the crust alone might be due to the weight of the ice caps or the "blobs" (LLVPs) in the mantle. Having said that, the crust is not a "rigid body," and the friction between the mantle and core would still prevent a rapid flip - i.e. "braking" mechanism.
quote:

The point is that they're not doing work close to what Shirley did
Elaborate?

quote:

that wasn't even anything close to sourced, traditional journalism itself
:lol: Who cares?
quote:

Naw it's in response to the various "reporting" out of Seattle by people trying to mimic Shirley and go viral like he did
This exonerates the WA AG none. The message is clear - don't look into this
I think SFP on rare occasions does actually have a moment of self awareness and that's when you see SFP exit a thread. There's some consciousness that the standard obfuscations didn't work. "Oh well, on to the next ridiculous assertions"
quote:

He knights for every idiotic left wing thought that makes its way to the board and then builds a wall of rhetoric which, when challenged, tires you out beating your head against all the tangential interpretations of the original plainly spoken issue
This is one of the most profound things I have read on this board in 20+ years

Having said that, SFP does not outlast me because I'm especially stubborn that way. :lol:

quote:

insists that 'SCOTUS' level dialog be used for every thought expressed
Yeah, I've wandered into that territory before. SCOTUS is not right about everything but SFP loves to cherry pick when SCOTUS seems to support the standard SFP distractions. Nevermind that rulings get overturned

quote:

A master of diversion and insignificant technical purity = but only in defense of plain-as-the-nose-on-your-face democrat corruption
Again, absolutely on the bull's eye. Center mass
Do you think there is ANYONE on this board who thinks you're reasonable, factual, rational, unbiased, etc. ANYBODY???

The best I've ever seen someone say about you is that you're "misunderstood" :lol:

You are a freaking joke and a fraud.