somethingdifferent

I was looking at the schedule last night

@Tenn is most certainly a loss. It's on the road, tough place to play and they have coaching/roster continuity. You have the most going against you in that game.

Bama\8&4\Tex at home. 3 likely losses. Same thing - coaching and roster continuity. Those 3 rosters will absolutely be better than LSUs

3 toss up games - Clemson, @Ole Miss, @Auburn. Clemson has roster and coaching continuity although not nearly as good as the SEC. Ole Miss is losing a lot but it's still tough to win on the road and there's probably never been a revenge game as tough as that one is about to be. Auburn has a salty defense and Golesh is a solid O coach. Auburn is a very tough place to win at.

Wins - @UK, Ms St, McNeese, @Ark, TBD rent a win.

On top of that, LSU might lose Baker. Tons of production to replace on D. Uncertain O line. Who is the QB?

I think even with Baker, the floor is 6-6 and the ceiling is 9-3 and that's being very optimistic

If LSU hangs on to Baker or gets an equal replacement, I expect LSU to be as good as anybody starting in 2027. Next year is going to be rough

quote:

---

How the hell do you know they're illegal BEFORE you detained them?

---

Is ICE capable of figuring this out? They seem to be doing a pretty darn good job so far

quote:

---

o you're perfectly ok with detaining citizens for a few hours

---

:confused: Where is this coming from? When did I say anything like this? Do you know what a strawman argument is?

quote:

---

Then I'll be ok for cops to come into your house and toss everything looking for drugs just because you look like a pothead

---

Profiling is illegal except, interestingly, in the case of suspected illegals. LEO can compel someone to present their green card, etc, if they suspect someone is here illegally

quote:

---

"Oh, we didn't find any drugs, sir. Sorry for the inconvenience."

---

Is this happening? No. So you can stop playing that childish game and stay on topic

quote:

---

If a country invaded us we don’t need to hold court and appeal hearings for a decade to remove them

---

Exactly. What if a militia forced their way across the border in a lightly guarded spot? Do we give them "due process?" HELL NO.

So what's the difference when we discover that corrupt politicians sent money to NGOs through USAID to assist people crossing illegally?

NONE

quote:

---

hundreds of lawsuits

---

:lol: disingenuous as usual

quote:

---

dozens of recounts

---

Proves nothing

quote:

---

a few audits

---

Proved ALOT

quote:

---

no real, hard evidence has been discovered to support the claim

---

Gaslighting at its finest

You are, without a doubt, the worst personality in the history of this board.

quote:

---

you are one of those boot lickers

---

I'm in a group of people that think we should be telling LEO what to do, not the other way around genius

quote:

---

if the authorities.cops say or think you are guilty, you are

---

:confused: This is so stupid. Is that happening even though it very well could be? I haven't seen any evidence of that despite thousands and thousands of arrests. Trump must be the worst dictator ever. He hasn't even jailed a single journalist in a year. He hasn't shut down any churches. He hasn't burned any Bibles. No gays/trans are in jail just because of their sexual preference

ICE could be mowing people down for obstructing their activities but that hasn't happened in even one case that I'm aware of even though lunatics have been harrassing them from coast to coast

quote:

---

But even that 99% is entitled to that (essentially "summary") hearing and to appeal its result.

---

If they are here illegally, that should not be the case. Once they are identified as illegal, they are out. No "hearing" is necessary and they certainly should not get the right to an appeal

Absolutely not

quote:

---

When the Trump administration just rounds people up

---

:lol: "just rounds up." You mean lawfully detains illegals

quote:

---

shoehorn's them onto a plane

---

Oh those poor souls

quote:

---

the administration is violating even the minimal "due process" to which those individuals were entitled

---

Negative. Absolutely wrong.

quote:

---

allowing government to ignore someone else's rights

---

THEY

ARE

ILLEGALS

quote:

---

is just an invitation for that same government to ignore THEIR rights tomorrow

---

Yet another juvenile strawman

quote:

---

And that citizens can murder them without consequence

---

Would a citizen know for a fact that a person was here illegally? Very very unlikely

quote:

---

What you are saying is people here illegally should be able to kill someone and get away with it because of lack of jurisdiction.

---

What the hell is this strawman. First, they shouldn't even be here meaning, get proactive at the border. Second, we should be hunting them down with impunity. Third, if they do commit a crime, they are not owed due process.

quote:

---

If you don't do due process you do not know if they are illegals

---

That's not what liberals are saying. Libs are saying they should all get full court cases which is absurd. Sorting illegals from citizens is just the boilerplate workflow

quote:

---

The trial that he talks about lasting several years in realisty lasts minutes

---

So we don't really have 20 million illegals in the country committing crimes?? Who knew?

quote:

---

every attorney will tell the loser of the trial that it is hopeless

---

Their trial dates are years down the road. That is why ICE is having to work so hard to find these people. Because the idiot previous administration did everything they could to circumvent the legal process and aided/abetted the illegals with all sorts of help paid for by YOUR tax money