- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ‘Read this email immediately’: CDC calls 180 employees back to work 2 weeks after firing
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:29 pm to the808bass
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:29 pm to the808bass
quote:
I like that you didn’t quote the relevant portion of my post. You’re just spouting partisan bullshite and hoping someone will fall for it.
Carry on, lil buddy. You know it all.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:30 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Are employees hired en masse like they are being fired?
Have you ever pruned a tree or a bush? Not every action is the world is symmetrical, and this action mirrors what happens in private industry every damn day when belts have to tighten.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:30 pm to 4cubbies
It would be comical if it weren't peoples jobs and lives being messed with at the whim of a 21 year old hacker making the max a govt employee can.....
This is Just one of several examples of the shitshow disorganized and poorly run doge actually is....
This is Just one of several examples of the shitshow disorganized and poorly run doge actually is....
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:31 pm to Flats
quote:
Have you ever pruned a tree or a bush?
Great analogy, though you're speaking to an activist who doesn't care if LGBTQ porn is in school libraries so don't expect much.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:31 pm to onepiecemayne
quote:
I've never seen anyone get laid off on Friday and re-hired on Monday. It has happened every week with DOGE.
No it hasn’t. God you commies lie with such ease
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:31 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
A bunch of people who took promotions or changed jobs/titles were given the axe and they were called "probationary". It was and is an ongoing clusterfrick.
If it were a normal business, you could fire anyone for any reason to stop the hemorrhaging. Because its the FedGov, we have to use the promotion loophole to cut and gut. Unfortunate, but its a problem the gov created itself.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:32 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
It would be comical if it weren't peoples jobs and lives being messed with at the whim of a 21 year old hacker making the max a govt employee can.
Citation needed.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:32 pm to the808bass
quote:
. I love how you shite questions out of your mouth thinking you know the answer when you don’t.
I ask tons of questions on here. I don’t think I know everything or even close to it.
Can you tell me more about which agencies hire employees en masse without considering each applicant? I help people find jobs, so this info would be good to have.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:32 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Doing so essentially "with cause", which is how many of the emails were worded, so that it potentially impacts unemployment benefits is even pettier.
First of all, just saying that in an email has absolutely no bearing on whether someone is awarded unemployment or not.
Actually, IME, there's actually almost nothing an employee can do that will lose them unemployment benefits if their local unemployment office wants to give it to them. I've had employees who resigned (not knowing that if you resign you can't collect unemployment) and I have sent the unemployment agency the signed letter of resignation. Didn't matter. They got unemployment.
I had one employee one time who was hired and then it was discovered that she lacked basic math skills (and I mean BASIC math skills...addition and subtraction) and couldn't perform the job she was hired for. She was only at the job for 3-4 days. AND she was offered to be moved to a position in which her lack of math skills wouldn't matter. She refused.
We ended up escalating that one up the chain and having a formal hearing with unemployment over that one. According to the written rules of unemployment, she wasn't even an employee long enough to be eligible for unemployment (like, not even close). According to their own rules. Didn't matter. She still got it.
I had another employee who quit because she got mad at her direct supervisor (actually I think she was on some new medication that caused her to go off the rails, but that's another story) and walked out, quit. She ended up telling unemployment that she was fired because she had car issues and couldn't make it to work, which was 100% a lie.
I can't remember how she ended up getting us involved in all of that, but somehow we were supposed to verify her termination to unemployment, and I told her that we couldn't lie to them. That would be fraud. We would be defrauding taxpayers at that point, which we couldn't do.
She got us on the phone with the unemployment office and after we explained out position the guy literally told us that he didn't care whether it was true or not. She got unemployment.
And every time one of these people were awarded unemployment, my unemployment insurance went up (for those of you with no knowledge of how this game works). So in addition to not being able to lie to the government agency (the ex-employee can lie, but imagine what would have happened if I would have lied), my motivation was to keep my unemployment insurance from being raised, not to "be petty."
The other moral of the story is that this is exactly the type of government fraud that is willfully engaged in every day in the US.
This post was edited on 3/5/25 at 9:34 pm
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:32 pm to 4cubbies
This isn't really a surprise. This was the expectation for me all along.aaa
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:32 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Citation needed.
Yeah, I think he’s 19.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:33 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Carry on, lil buddy. You know it all.
I know not to breathlessly read the news about the Trump administration and run here and post it uncritically.
Lemme know when you admit that probationary periods are typically waived for Federal employees who are transferring or promoted to a similar job.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:33 pm to Sweep Da Leg
quote:
No it hasn’t. God you commies lie with such ease
Idk if it's actually weekly, more common or slightly inconsistent but this isn't the first time.
We have at least examples with folks fighting bird flu and nuclear stockpile management as well the last couple weeks though.....
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:33 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
4cubbies
why are you ignoring my question?
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:34 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
You think we spent $10M on transgender mice.
Ummm you may want to check with your obvious prime news source. They had to fact check their fact check and admit they were wrong.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:34 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Yeah, I think he’s 19.
And the firing is merely "at his whim"? No oversight? No management to report findings to?
Also, where are those Biden threads I've been asking you about?
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:35 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Can you tell me more about which agencies hire employees en masse without considering each applicant?
That’s not the question you asked. You asked if they hire people en masse. They do. They also give new employees probationary status. Why?
Just try to make like a little decision tree and work through these issues internally before you pretend to practice the Socratic method completely unsuccessfully here.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:35 pm to Flats
quote:
Have you ever pruned a tree or a bush? Not every action is the world is symmetrical, and this action mirrors what happens in private industry every damn day when belts have to tighten.
I value humans more than leaves. Shouldn’t we hold the government to a higher standard than a landscaper?
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:36 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Actually, IME, there's actually almost nothing an employee can do that will lose them unemployment benefits if their local unemployment office wants to give it to them
i have never lost an unemployment claim by an ex employee. but I only get one or two every other year. usually hearings done over the phone that last about 10 minutes.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:36 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Weird, you criticize everything he does.
I criticize everything he does when it comes to Israel because he completely undersold us on it. This blind allegiance is sickening and a slap to the face to Christians everywhere. Israel belongs to Palestinian Christians! Not Jews.
And proudly call him out because unlike y'all, I am fully aware that politicians aren't my friends. Accountability and scrutiny should be celebrated, not shamed. I refuse to be a monolith that accepts everything just because Trump says so.
Hell, half of you frickers would probably frick a dude if Trump said that dating trans women was normal. Learn to think for yourself for once and question everything.
Popular
Back to top


1







