Started By
Message

re: Question for those that oppose the tariffs

Posted on 4/2/25 at 8:37 pm to
Posted by fareplay
Member since Nov 2012
6559 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 8:37 pm to
yeah im hurting baw. I wanted to buy a new car and now dealerships wont even negotiate off MSRP. This directly impacts my wallet
Posted by prplngldtigr
just up da bayou from down
Member since Dec 2004
8173 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 8:39 pm to
Ah aight.

“Hurting”.

You’ll be aight.

Got kids?
They’ll thank you one day.
Posted by fareplay
Member since Nov 2012
6559 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 8:40 pm to
Such a dumb take, if my kid grows up creating screws for a living in place of some random kid from china, our country has truly failed.

Imagine competing with lessers instead of better
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138519 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

Why are we hurting Americans?
Because that's what happens when Americans vote for a $37T national debt.
This post was edited on 4/2/25 at 8:42 pm
Posted by prplngldtigr
just up da bayou from down
Member since Dec 2004
8173 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 8:43 pm to
One- be patient.

Two- if ya kid makes screws really well and it’s better than the screws the Chinese kid was making - congrats, dad!

Posted by Warboo
Enterprise Alabama
Member since Sep 2018
5899 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

Such a dumb take, if my kid grows up creating screws for a living in place of some random kid from china, our country has truly failed. Imagine competing with lessers instead of better


Imagine paying for people to sit at home drawing a government check while citizens could be “creating screws for a living” instead of someone in another country doing it and causing more trade deficits.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13207 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

Are other country’s tariffs on US products okay and why?


Other countries tariffs are their business and have nothing to do with our decisions.

Tariffs artificially hurt domestic consumers and artificially protect domestic producers. In many, if not all, of these countries, there isn't as much emphasis on free trade as there is here. And I don't mean that in an international sense, I mean that in the sense that barriers to entry for starting and then costs for owning a business are greater there than here.

So does it make sense for them to protect their producers at the expense of their consumers? I couldn't say without knowing all of the details, but I can say that it makes a lot more sense than it does for us to pick producers over consumers.

quote:

Are cheap goods and labor more important than economic fairness and longterm reliability for the US economy?


"Economic fairness" is a specious term that sounds good as a sound bite but means nothing.

And, the cost of goods and labor directly affects the health of the US economy. So you tell me whether it is worth prioritizing or not.

I don't know what you mean by "longterm reliability." There's an inherent claim being made there, but I'm not sure I want to address it without being more certain exactly what the claim is.

quote:

How would you level the trading playing field and give the US either fairness or the advantage minus tariffs?


Again, "fairness" in this context is a junior high level way of looking at this.

Would it be better if we could achieve more free trade?

In my opinion it would be. In my opinion if Trump can get everyone else to drop their tariffs and then we drop ours, that would be the bast case scenario and the only valid reason to use tariffs like he's using them.

But those of you who are for these tariffs shouldn't like that outcome.

Not if you're going to argue that American needs more manufacturing jobs and it's a threat to national security to rely on other countries for making certain things (which is what I suspect you mean by "longterm reliability above).

Because the above scenario—everyone dropping their tariffs—is basically NAFTA extended globally. It's literally the Globalism that causes 90% of the posters here to spit through forked fingers after typing.

More free trade probably means MORE jobs outsourced from America (to be fair, it probably also means the creation of some stateside as American businesses grow...but most of the growth will be factory labor overseas).

Ya'll have got to understand some things about this and stop just spouting whatever comes to mind to try to argue for it because "Orange Good."

If you think more American jobs and national security in manufacturing is the top priority, then you don't want Canada and the UK and Vietnam and whoever else to drop their tariffs.

You want them to dig in and tell Trump to go screw. You want the EU to follow through on their threat to cut off certain American imports altogether.

You want Japan, China, and S. Korea to send back a fortune cookie that says, "Trump is asshoe."

Them dropping the tariffs is the opposite of what you want. That ensures that the manufacturing stays right where it is...overseas.

Now if free trade is your highest priority, then great! You can celebrate when other countries cave. But you need to understand that what that means is that American producers will sell more stuff overseas—which will grow their overseas operations more than their domestic ones—and since we aren't heavily tariffing many products from overseas right now, we probably won't notice much difference in anything else. American producers win, American consumers don't notice much difference. Jobs continue to get outsourced, we continue to buy cheaper goods from overseas.
This post was edited on 4/2/25 at 8:57 pm
Posted by Warboo
Enterprise Alabama
Member since Sep 2018
5899 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

Such a dumb take, if my kid grows up creating screws for a living in place of some random kid from china, our country has truly failed. Imagine competing with lessers instead of better


That statement is why we are where we are. You should be ashamed and I feel for your children being brought up by someone that does not instill hard work benefits you regardless of trade or education. You are a perfect example of why this country is failing.
Posted by Figgy
CenCal
Member since May 2020
10330 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

It says those organizations sponsored the study. So it’s not like they did the study, the two authors did.


Right, but the organizations did sign off on it and there was also a letter that was sent to the USTR signed off by a lot more organizations asking for a reevaluation of things. Now did they sign off on it to maintain the status quo? It's certainly possible. Or did they sign off out of genuine concern? That's possible too. We are represented by one of the organizations that signed it. I can promise you that price increases are happening now after a lot of heads up from our suppliers. I just saw an item that is produced in Mexico and it is now close to 25% higher than it was in early March. So price increases are hitting and those will hit our clients which include businesses of various size and industry, schools, and government. But it won't end there as consumers will pay too. Crap rolls downhill after all. How much damage are we willing to absorb to try and get manufacturing back here is what I'm sitting back and watching for. I think it needs to happen for certain industries (medical for example) and not so much for others. The same businesses that are seeing costs increase may pull the plug on marketing (which would hurt us in some areas), lessen bonuses, cut hiring, cut expansion plans and so on. These are just some of the possible hits we take. But in the long run I do believe if we can weather this I think we come out stronger. Which is what this is all about. I am unsure whether John Q Public has the stomach for it. Here's to hoping they do.
Posted by fareplay
Member since Nov 2012
6559 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

That statement is why we are where we are


rich?
Posted by atlgamecockman
Nola
Member since Dec 2012
4392 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 8:56 pm to
Trade balances =|= tariff percentages man. This is suuuuuper basic.
Posted by fareplay
Member since Nov 2012
6559 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 8:57 pm to
just take the L man, go chatgpt for a few and come back
Posted by Warboo
Enterprise Alabama
Member since Sep 2018
5899 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

Trade balances =|= tariff percentages man. This is suuuuuper basic.


Agree 100%.
Posted by scottydoesntknow
Member since Nov 2023
10870 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 9:19 pm to
quote:

quote:
What levers would you pull to make the US economy the best in the world?


Who has the best economy in the world?


Is the man that is maxing out his credit cards to buy nice things, rich?
Posted by Rust Cohle
Baton rouge
Member since Mar 2014
2152 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 9:38 pm to
I understand there are many threads on the subject, but it’s difficult to compile the logic as a singular stream of reasonings.

I’d like those that oppose to opine on the following: I don’t oppose them but can argue the other side.

Are other country’s tariffs on US products okay and why? Yes, the US has advantages that other countries can’t, like reserve currency. And much of trade also includes diplomacy.

Are cheap goods and labor more important than economic fairness and longterm reliability for the US economy? Seems that way the last 30-40 years, but there are also other motivations to the bottom line, which isn’t just an equal trade deal, like diplomacy.

How would you level the trading playing field and give the US either fairness or the advantage minus tariffs? The US does have the advantage.

What levers would you pull to make the US economy the best in the world? It is the best in the world, and supports the previous answer.

Just as there is an obesity crisis from cheap high calorie food, there is a materialist consumer crisis with cheap foreign goods. It’s not just $100 50” TVs, it’s comfort creep. A truck in 1970 was affordable, but people are shocked with truck prices today. Need I say more than ventilated seats. We’ve gotten so bloated on necessity. This is evidence of the US advantage, and so much so that all the countries are complicit. Continuing to trade while the US devalues its dollar and buy treasuries of that printed money. This inflation hurts those t bond holders (US debt, that our taxes pay their interest) but they pivot and buy inflated US assets that we also pay.

You are assuming a trade deficit is bad. That tariffs are a UGE deal. It’s all super convoluted and probably no one knows what’s up. Much of this is from the shocking reality during COVID on how dependent we were on others.


Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
16347 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

This is a short sighted view of tariffs. Tariffs are leverage and tools for creating environments an actions that are good for the USA.


Tariffs are many things. Yes they raise prices on the goods taxed AND they’re a tool that can be used to try to level a playing field.

. I thought the latter went without saying.

An example of how tarriffs can level a playing field and raise prices is right in our back yard. Shrimp. It gets imported from overseas and sold here below what we can profitably sell them for. Our shrimpers are put at a competetive disadvantage as they have higher overhead than Mexico or China.

So I support putting tarriffs on imported shrimp to level the playing field. To the consumer, it will certainly mean higher prices. Consumers suffer. Shrimpers benefit.

Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63249 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

Are other country’s tariffs on US products okay and why?
Most countries tariffs don't matter because 1/we don't export much, and 2/ our goods are unaffordable even without tariffs.

quote:

Are cheap goods and labor more important than economic fairness and longterm reliability for the US economy?

Define "fair". Is it "fair" that the US dollar is more valuable than foreign currencies? Is it "fair" that the US can simply print more dollars and buy tangible goods at a steep discount with them? Is it good for the economy to overpay for goods? Why not simply require things be more expensive with price controls so companies would have mroe money to pay workers more salary with. Then we'd all be rich, right?

quote:

How would you level the trading playing field and give the US either fairness or the advantage minus tariffs?
This is like saying "how do we make everyone have the same amount of income". It's never going to be "fair". A place like Singapore will NEVER be an major wheat exporter. Nor will Dubai, nor Finland. And the US will NEVER be a major labor supplier unless our labor gets ALOT cheaper. The idea that every country should have the same amounts of imports as they do exports and all should have the same amounts of trade is silly. The idea that it can me made "equitable" with tariffs is even sillier. This like demcrats wanting to tax the rich and redistribute it to eliminate "income indquality"

quote:

What levers would you pull to make the US economy the best in the world?
What makes you think it isn't? The US needs a plan to deal with NOT being the world's reserve currency at some point. But that means dealing with the $39 trillion in soverign debt and $137 trillion on NPV of entitlement liabilities. Trade has nothing to do with either of these, and pushing the world away from USD with a trade war is the opposite of what we need to be doing.

In short, if we could tax ourselves into prospertiy by creating economic ineffeciency (over paying for goods) why not just use massive taxes and minimum wages, and make-work programs?
This post was edited on 4/2/25 at 10:14 pm
Posted by RollTide4Ever
Nashville
Member since Nov 2006
20074 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 10:17 pm to
America has high trade deficits bc of low interest rates.
Posted by atlgamecockman
Nola
Member since Dec 2012
4392 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

America has high trade deficits bc


Bc we don't make shite here anymore besides tech
Posted by RollTide4Ever
Nashville
Member since Nov 2006
20074 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 10:24 pm to
Thanks to regulation and low savings.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram