- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pentagon Press Corps Nearly Unanimously Turns In Their Badges
Posted on 10/16/25 at 12:33 am to AggieDub14
Posted on 10/16/25 at 12:33 am to AggieDub14
quote:
It applies to information that is not classified. Such a bad faith argument.
It's a good argument but you are grossly uneducated here. Just because something is "unclassified" doesn't make it fair game for the press. I handle CUI stuff everday, the press doesn't have a blanket right to it no more than Joe frickwad off the street. Unclassified pieces of information can also be aggregated into a document that could be considered classified by the OCA too.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 3:18 am to AggieDub14
He decides who can and can't come in, they can report all they want they don't like it tuff shite
Posted on 10/16/25 at 3:20 am to AggieDub14
Obviously not cause they when home to mommy and cried ehy should they get free rein to go wherever they want, good maybe some of the leaking stops
Posted on 10/16/25 at 4:34 am to AggieDub14
I am shocked that none of these security measures were implemented before to be honest. This move is likely to stop leaks from insiders who feed info to the media and it is obviosly effective because of the bitching occuring.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 4:37 am to AggieDub14
Good good let them go sulk off because they can’t do their jobs with barely any effort anymore.
You are weak fig if you side with the media on anything especially against reasonable rules
You are weak fig if you side with the media on anything especially against reasonable rules
Posted on 10/16/25 at 4:41 am to AggieDub14
quote:
Hegseth shouldn't be allowed
He is, cupcake. Deal with it.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 5:14 am to AggieDub14
You and the people that have a problem with this are part of the problem in this country…
Posted on 10/16/25 at 5:26 am to AggieDub14
quote:
Hope future president's don't do that with the 2nd amendment.
Instead they will let the enemy into the pentagon.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 5:45 am to cajunangelle
quote:
all's they had to do was get credentialed - a badge and don't hang out in the pentagon like a chinese hooker on the take for Vindman and Swallowswell..
They already had badges and never roamed freely to start with. Their issue was with not asking people for information that turned out to be not authorized to be released.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 5:49 am to AggieDub14
quote:
Report what daddy government says or youre gone
Interesting way to spin it. Could it be they don’t want media wandering around and reporting sensitive information that could be detrimental to the American people?
Posted on 10/16/25 at 5:52 am to AggieDub14
Less media is a good thing as they are constructed now. When the majority of them are more interested in narratives and lies over truthful reporting we can do without them
Posted on 10/16/25 at 5:54 am to AggieDub14
"We actually read through the new Department of War media access guidelines, and we found zero new restrictions on the ability of journalists to report on or criticize the government. Many corporate journalists eager to grandstand will claim otherwise without evidence, but we will show you what the actual document says. "
“Nothing in this document requires you to waive any constitutional rights. This in-brief constitutes a description of [Department of War] policies."
Several reporters posted on social media when they turned in their press badges.

“Nothing in this document requires you to waive any constitutional rights. This in-brief constitutes a description of [Department of War] policies."
Several reporters posted on social media when they turned in their press badges.
This post was edited on 10/16/25 at 5:57 am
Posted on 10/16/25 at 6:00 am to AggieDub14
quote:Not in the least. It's good to have out in the open.
This is concerning.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 6:07 am to NC_Tigah
Agreed.
What IS concerning is having media members saying that messages between a transgender political assassin and his homosexual lover sent by the assassin minutes after murdering Charlie Kirk were “touching and sweet”
It’s also concerning that we have illegal immigrants somehow registered to vote and yet certain media outlets don’t talk about that. I also find it concerning that some media outlets are more concerned about protecting the rights of illegal inmigrants and criminals than they are about protecting the rights of law abiding US citizens.
I find those things more disturbing. But that’s just me being a fascist.
What IS concerning is having media members saying that messages between a transgender political assassin and his homosexual lover sent by the assassin minutes after murdering Charlie Kirk were “touching and sweet”
It’s also concerning that we have illegal immigrants somehow registered to vote and yet certain media outlets don’t talk about that. I also find it concerning that some media outlets are more concerned about protecting the rights of illegal inmigrants and criminals than they are about protecting the rights of law abiding US citizens.
I find those things more disturbing. But that’s just me being a fascist.
This post was edited on 10/16/25 at 6:10 am
Posted on 10/16/25 at 6:13 am to AggieDub14
quote:
Report what daddy government says or youre gone"
Uh huh...
Obama tried kicking Fox News out of the White House Press Corp.
Same thing or worse?
This post was edited on 10/16/25 at 6:15 am
Posted on 10/16/25 at 6:13 am to AggieDub14
quote:
Hope future president's don't do that with the 2nd amendment.
well I already can't freely walk around the Pentagon with a gun so.....
Posted on 10/16/25 at 6:14 am to NC_Tigah
I’m laughing at the one still wearing a mask. I’m sure her reporting was accurate and unbiased.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 6:15 am to AggieDub14
quote:
This is concerning.
No it's not.
They're not journalists or news. They are not working for the Americans people to keep them knowledgeable about things concerning the US government as it relates to the American citizens.
They are the propaganda arm of the democrat party and only in the business of pushing the lies and agenda of their puppet masters in the DNC.
Life would be better without them.
Hopefully they do the same thing with the White House press room.
quote:
Thats a clear violation of the 1st amendment.
No it isn't. You do not have a right to know everything that is happening in the War Department. People who do not have Americas best interest at hand certainly do not either. MSM, yes, I'm looking at you.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 6:50 am to AggieDub14
He’s not controlling what can or cannot be reported. They can report anything they want.
Why they can’t do is wander the halls of the Pentagon looking for malcontents and then report leaks from “unnamed sources”.
Why they can’t do is wander the halls of the Pentagon looking for malcontents and then report leaks from “unnamed sources”.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 7:31 am to AggieDub14
It is the department of war. I am ok with them having secrets they need to keep.
Popular
Back to top



0














