Started By
Message

Paxton may have a problem with the Adam Hoffman issue

Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:41 pm
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173990 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:41 pm
quote:

Adam Dean Hoffman's plea agreement with Attorney General Ken Paxton was originally for 30 days in jail. A Waco visiting judge doubled that sentence to 60 days. Hoffman was released Monday May 25th, 2026 after being sentenced on April 27th, 2026


quote:

Community members have expressed frustration over the outcome of the case.

"It's just a total miscarriage of justice to know that our attorney general's office can, can do these kinds of things," State Representative Pat Curry said.

"The sick part is, is that he didn't, there is no penalty. He admitted to the crime of having sex with a child," said Rep. Curry.

Waco Attorney Guilty of Child Sex Crimes released in under 30 days

quote:

“Think about this kiddo and what this kid went through at age 8, and 9, and 10,” Cotlar said during the closing arguments, later adding, “He’s not lying, and you know that because he’s so specific.”



Texas Tribune

Dude had sex with a boy for 3 years and got out with a slap on the wrist and is still licensed to practice law.

Not a good look for Paxton.

Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115665 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:43 pm to
Paxton had zero to do with this case.
Posted by tommy2tone1999
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2008
7803 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:44 pm to
Do you even see who is running against Paxton?
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173990 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:45 pm to
Why does the article reference him then?
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47681 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:46 pm to
If you think Texans are going to look on the other side of the ticket, see that closeted soy boy Talarico, and vote for she/her over Paxton over this, you are delusional.
Posted by Jtomka
Member since Sep 2022
362 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:48 pm to

Here are some facts about the case:

The case was tried and resulted in a hung jury.

Then the victim refused to testify again.

Attorneys who are employed by the state of Texas offered the initial deal and accepted the final deal without Paxton's personal involvement.


Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173990 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:48 pm to
I mean it's a pretty serious accusation if his office let this guy off on such a slap on the wrist plea deal

Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139362 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

Dude had sex with a boy for 3 years and got out with a slap on the wrist and is still licensed to practice law.
The first jury was hung 7-5. So to say he's guilty assumes he needs to prove himself innocent.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173990 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:50 pm to
quote:


Attorneys who are employed by the state of Texas offered the initial deal and accepted the final deal without Paxton's personal involvement.


If he had no personal involvement then that obviously changes everything

I would like to know who actually was involved that allowed a deal this favorable to the defendent.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
111063 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

If you think Texans are going to look on the other side of the ticket, see that closeted soy boy Talarico, and vote for she/her over Paxton over this, you are delusional.


It's like he's so hopeful that it COULD happen, though.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
77977 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

Not a good look for Paxton.

If this story has you upset, you're really gonna be hating life when you find out the sort of animals that blue city DA's propped up by George Soros have been letting loose on the streets.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47681 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:52 pm to
KP wasnt involved in this case, but I know you wont acknowledge that shite. Let's just say if your party had someone other than a pedo-muppet running against him, your concerns might have some validity.
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
23282 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

the case went to trial last year but ended in a hung jury, and the young victim did not want to testify a second time.
“The child emphasized that he preferred to move on with his life and prioritize his mental and emotional health,” wrote the prosecutors, Brenda Cantu and Dorian Cotlar.




Seems like they didn't have a lot of choice. They had already tried it once and didn't have a witness if they went to trial.
Posted by Tigergreg
Metairie
Member since Feb 2005
26456 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:55 pm to
There was a mistrial. When it went to trial again, the boy decided he did not want to go through it again, so Paxton had no choice to cut a deal. Without the boy testifying, a conviction was impossible.
Posted by Sweep Da Leg
Member since Sep 2013
3838 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

Why does the article reference him then?


Because it’s the Texas tribune which is a Marxist propaganda rag
Posted by LSUgrad88
Member since Jun 2009
9228 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

Paxton had zero to do with this case.


The absolute delusion some of you have is unreal, pathetic, disgusting, etc.
Posted by Rip Torner
Member since Jul 2023
2560 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 4:06 pm to
YOU would like to know? I am sure they will get right to it but you are more concerned with some random case than the politician who supports gender affirming surgery which has destroyed countless numbers of lives in the US. Your concerns are laughable per usual
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
32126 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

Seems like they didn't have a lot of choice. They had already tried it once and didn't have a witness if they went to trial.
What does Powerman think could've been done in this case once there was no witness?
Posted by LSUgrad88
Member since Jun 2009
9228 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Attorneys who are employed by the state of Texas offered the initial deal and accepted the final deal without Paxton's personal involvement.


It was the Office of the Texas Attorney General that negotiated the deal in a high profile case. The audacity to claim Paxton knew nothing about it is pathetic. But continue to lie to yourselves. It’s Cult 101 behavior.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram