Started By
Message

re: Patel suing The Atlantic

Posted on 4/20/26 at 7:35 pm to
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59239 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

I think one of the claims was that he was not responding or didn’t show up one day and so they were worried and had to call bust down the door to see if he was ok. Embarrassing stuff like that.

Which document provided this information? Be specific.

Did you fall for the Russian collusion bullshite too? fricking morons will never learn.
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
12175 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 7:40 pm to
Haha. I’m not the one suing for libel so it’s not on me to name names.

Now if you think it wasn’t properly sourced, you can state your case.
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
12175 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 7:40 pm to
Phone records might be the documentation
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128695 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

Very interesting it stated right wing type outlets were less likely to use anonymous sources, which I'm assuming included stories about the Biden Administration.


The real story is that there’s plenty of reporters who will make up stories and then source it to an “anonymous source.” When there is no source.
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
12175 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 7:45 pm to
Are you upset about the lawsuit or what?

You can spike the football if he wins a big judgement.

Until then, you’re just acting like an angry little elf about it…
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115036 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

I’ve heard that the article was sourced by something like two dozen people within the FBI.


And, yet, 2 media outlets (including Reuters-no friend of Trump) can't confirm any of it
Posted by ManBearTiger
BRLA
Member since Jun 2007
22571 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 7:59 pm to
Ol Ghislain has some serious cans
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
12175 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 7:59 pm to
So are you going on record with a predicted outcome?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115036 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

So are you going on record with a predicted outcome?


I am merely rebutting your statement
Posted by Froman
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
38896 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:02 pm to
Haha, that dude is such a loser.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115036 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:06 pm to
quote:
When I was practicing I would routinely send out 100 interrogatory questions just to see the response of the other side.


If you actually practiced you would know these would be objected to


I am sure he got leave of court.
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
12175 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:12 pm to
I know. But at least I’m calling my pick.
If I’m wrong I have no problem admitting as much.

Where is the sense of adventure or risk taking?


Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37399 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:28 pm to
Naturally, if you were stupid. But I'm still sending, until you are filing a motion, but I'm entitled to ask questions as a matter of discovery. The Plaintiff started this with the suit, I'll willingly answer interrogatories and provide any discovery you ask for and I mean any, especially in this case.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59239 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

Haha. I’m not the one suing for libel so it’s not on me to name names. Now if you think it wasn’t properly sourced, you can state your case.


so you don’t know any facts. Just wishcasting. Got it. We all already knew.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59239 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

Phone records might be the documentation


Post them.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59239 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:34 pm to
quote:

So are you going on record with a predicted outcome?


Are you?
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
37708 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:34 pm to
Dude. You are melting.


Take 5-15 offline.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59239 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

Naturally, if you were stupid. But I'm still sending, until you are filing a motion, but I'm entitled to ask questions as a matter of discovery. The Plaintiff started this with the suit, I'll willingly answer interrogatories and provide any discovery you ask for and I mean any, especially in this case.


If you actually practiced you would know why it’s a bad move to gleefully send so many interrogatories as you claimed you would to be petty. Can you guess why?
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59239 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

Dude. You are melting. Take 5-15 offline.


Let’s compare how many posts you have had this month to mine. When people ignorantly post about the law I will point it out.
Posted by beaux duke
Member since Oct 2023
4758 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

Ol Ghislain has some serious cans

first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram