- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Patel suing The Atlantic
Posted on 4/20/26 at 7:35 pm to AGGIES
Posted on 4/20/26 at 7:35 pm to AGGIES
quote:
I think one of the claims was that he was not responding or didn’t show up one day and so they were worried and had to call bust down the door to see if he was ok. Embarrassing stuff like that.
Which document provided this information? Be specific.
Did you fall for the Russian collusion bullshite too? fricking morons will never learn.
Posted on 4/20/26 at 7:40 pm to BBONDS25
Haha. I’m not the one suing for libel so it’s not on me to name names.
Now if you think it wasn’t properly sourced, you can state your case.
Now if you think it wasn’t properly sourced, you can state your case.
Posted on 4/20/26 at 7:40 pm to BBONDS25
Phone records might be the documentation
Posted on 4/20/26 at 7:42 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
Very interesting it stated right wing type outlets were less likely to use anonymous sources, which I'm assuming included stories about the Biden Administration.
The real story is that there’s plenty of reporters who will make up stories and then source it to an “anonymous source.” When there is no source.
Posted on 4/20/26 at 7:45 pm to BBONDS25
Are you upset about the lawsuit or what?
You can spike the football if he wins a big judgement.
Until then, you’re just acting like an angry little elf about it…
You can spike the football if he wins a big judgement.
Until then, you’re just acting like an angry little elf about it…
Posted on 4/20/26 at 7:56 pm to AGGIES
quote:
I’ve heard that the article was sourced by something like two dozen people within the FBI.
And, yet, 2 media outlets (including Reuters-no friend of Trump) can't confirm any of it
Posted on 4/20/26 at 7:59 pm to Ailsa
Ol Ghislain has some serious cans
Posted on 4/20/26 at 7:59 pm to udtiger
So are you going on record with a predicted outcome?
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:01 pm to AGGIES
quote:
So are you going on record with a predicted outcome?
I am merely rebutting your statement
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:02 pm to TFH
Haha, that dude is such a loser.
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:06 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
When I was practicing I would routinely send out 100 interrogatory questions just to see the response of the other side.
If you actually practiced you would know these would be objected to
I am sure he got leave of court.
When I was practicing I would routinely send out 100 interrogatory questions just to see the response of the other side.
If you actually practiced you would know these would be objected to
I am sure he got leave of court.
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:12 pm to udtiger
I know. But at least I’m calling my pick.
If I’m wrong I have no problem admitting as much.
Where is the sense of adventure or risk taking?
If I’m wrong I have no problem admitting as much.
Where is the sense of adventure or risk taking?
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:28 pm to BBONDS25
Naturally, if you were stupid. But I'm still sending, until you are filing a motion, but I'm entitled to ask questions as a matter of discovery. The Plaintiff started this with the suit, I'll willingly answer interrogatories and provide any discovery you ask for and I mean any, especially in this case.
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:33 pm to AGGIES
quote:
Haha. I’m not the one suing for libel so it’s not on me to name names. Now if you think it wasn’t properly sourced, you can state your case.
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:33 pm to AGGIES
quote:
Phone records might be the documentation
Post them.
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:34 pm to AGGIES
quote:
So are you going on record with a predicted outcome?
Are you?
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:34 pm to BBONDS25
Dude. You are melting.
Take 5-15 offline.
Take 5-15 offline.
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:35 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
Naturally, if you were stupid. But I'm still sending, until you are filing a motion, but I'm entitled to ask questions as a matter of discovery. The Plaintiff started this with the suit, I'll willingly answer interrogatories and provide any discovery you ask for and I mean any, especially in this case.
If you actually practiced you would know why it’s a bad move to gleefully send so many interrogatories as you claimed you would to be petty. Can you guess why?
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:37 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
Dude. You are melting. Take 5-15 offline.
Let’s compare how many posts you have had this month to mine. When people ignorantly post about the law I will point it out.
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:39 pm to ManBearTiger
quote:
Ol Ghislain has some serious cans
Popular
Back to top


2







