- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Oregon mandates training for state workers to not cooperate with Trump deportation plans
Posted on 1/19/25 at 10:46 am to idlewatcher
Posted on 1/19/25 at 10:46 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Trump needs to go hard in the paint on this rhetoric. Jail them. They are obstructing a federal order
Four year sentenced felons for the first ones and held with no bail. Sound familiar.
Posted on 1/19/25 at 10:46 am to Timeoday
Chicago public schools are teaching illegals their rights.
Another example of why major cities are in decline. No respect for the private sector workers.
Another example of why major cities are in decline. No respect for the private sector workers.
Posted on 1/19/25 at 10:48 am to cadillacattack
This is my take. You want to be free of federal oversight fine, but you get no federal money.
Posted on 1/19/25 at 10:49 am to Timeoday
quote:
"The Sanctuary Promise Act requires all requests made by federal agencies to state and local law enforcement and government agencies regarding immigration enforcement to be documented, reported, and denied."
Looks like a RICO conspiracy.
Posted on 1/19/25 at 10:52 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Looks like a RICO conspiracy.
Exactly. But government knows once it opens up that pandora's box regarding RICO charges against a government it will forever face that burden of possible RICO action against it.
But I would love to see it used to straighten out the knuckleheads in government.
Posted on 1/19/25 at 10:54 am to Timeoday
Cut all federal funding to Oregon. It’s that simple.
Posted on 1/19/25 at 10:54 am to PaperTiger
quote:
I'm not against it because I'm all for states right, but I'm also in the camp to shut off any federal dollars until they change.
I’m a big 10th Amendment fan. However the 10th says anything not specifically enumerated in the Constitution shall be left to the states. Protecting the border is specifically enumerated. It is one of the few issues where it is clearly not a states rights issue.
Posted on 1/19/25 at 11:01 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Trump needs to go hard in the paint on this rhetoric. Jail them. They are obstructing a federal order
This is probably a “state’s rights” argument and I don’t necessarily disagree with that.
The federal govt. can, however, limit, restrict, or reduce federal funding. Just like they did here in LA over the drinking age back in the 90’s.
Posted on 1/19/25 at 11:11 am to omegaman66
quote:
The first to be arrested should be the ones "training" their employees to do illegal acts. Send their arse to jail, PLEASE!
It’s should be the leaders of the state DOJ, not some $60k/year HR trainer.
Posted on 1/19/25 at 11:15 am to Timeoday
So why is Oregon allowed to obstruct deportation but Texas is not allowed to prevent illegal immigration? People always say “immigration is enforced federally and not by the states”. Hopefully Trump drops the hammer on them and hard
Posted on 1/19/25 at 11:29 am to Timeoday
Sounds like all federal funding should stop in Oregon
Posted on 1/19/25 at 11:37 am to prouddawg
quote:
Cut all federal funding to Oregon. It’s that simple.
Screw that, cut anything that crosses state lines, highways, internet, water, power, airport, SWIFT banking system, ocean freight crossing federal waters. Lets see what kind of pioneers they really are.
Posted on 1/19/25 at 11:37 am to Timeoday
Issue a simple statement stating that any government agencies cooperating with this activity will be cut off from federal dollars.
It would end this nonsense immediately
It would end this nonsense immediately
Posted on 1/19/25 at 11:47 am to PaperTiger
quote:
I'm not against it because I'm all for states right
I prefer the right of the states to be protected from invasion via our US constitutional mandate to the Feds to protect them.
Posted on 1/19/25 at 11:53 am to PaperTiger
I'm in the camp where you take the amount of welfare money budgeted from a balanced budget and divide it by the number of recipients.
Posted on 1/19/25 at 11:55 am to Timeoday
I will not believe that anything will be done about this Resistance and Lawfare against the MAGA movement until the first perp is on trial in federal criminal court.
I do not and will not believe it until I see it happen - pics in court of a prosecutor arguing the criminal prosecution of one of these Democrats.
I will not believe it and neither should any of you believe that a strong effort to stop this can happen.
I do not and will not believe it until I see it happen - pics in court of a prosecutor arguing the criminal prosecution of one of these Democrats.
I will not believe it and neither should any of you believe that a strong effort to stop this can happen.
Posted on 1/19/25 at 11:56 am to Timeoday
And just like that, democrats are all about states rights. Like someone mentioned, I don’t want an overbearing federal govt(although we really do anyway), but all federal funding needs to be stripped.
Popular
Back to top


0









