Started By
Message

re: Official RT Indictment Thread -- Youtubers Lauren Chen, Dave Rubin, Tim Pool Linked

Posted on 9/6/24 at 11:08 am to
Posted by TarheelPete
Carrboro
Member since Jun 2024
615 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 11:08 am to
China and Russia have raped your brain so hard you have nothing left between your ears other than a slurry of General Tso and Ivan jizz.
Posted by scottydoesntknow
Member since Nov 2023
10870 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 11:13 am to
Lets put this story through our common sense filter:

- Why would an entity pay this much money over content it didnt have direct influence over?

- How long has DOJ known about this? Why now?

-Our government and DOJ has already demonstrated without a shred of doubt that it is biased and corrupt. Why should we think we are getting the honest full story in this indictment?

-Who is benefiting from this indictment becoming public?
This post was edited on 9/6/24 at 11:15 am
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
122841 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 11:17 am to
Anyone else remember when Teddy Kennedy sent cables to the soviets asking for help to beat Reagan in the 80s? The media doesn’t, either
Posted by Old Money
LSU
Member since Sep 2012
41778 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 11:27 am to
quote:

How are the influencers supposed to know Tenet Media was paying them with Cia...I mean Russian money?

Do you ask your employer where they are getting their money to pay your salary? 1000 out of a 1000 employees don't ask that question. They just want to get paid for services due.


Why does everything have to be some conspiracy. You list the CIA here for what reason? To make it look like this was fake? These people took money from a Russian source to promote a narrative driven by the source. The CIA was not involved in that chain. There is this like cognitive dissonance among RW people where absolutely everything is fake/nothing is real. It is like watching a cult in real time. Truly amazing to witness a bunch of free thinkers all think the same exact thing.
Posted by 14&Counting
Dallas, TX
Member since Jul 2012
42075 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 11:28 am to
quote:

Our government and DOJ has already demonstrated without a shred of doubt that it is biased and corrupt. Why should we think we are getting the honest full story in this indictment?

-Who is benefiting from this indictment becoming public?


So I guess the "crime" here is the FARA violations and associated wire fraud and no one is really disputing the validity of the content?

Meanwhile Hunter Biden was running around for years doing much worse on behalf of the CCP and Ukrainian and Russian oligarchs and didn't catch a single charge.

Posted by jclem11
Chief Nihilist
Member since Nov 2011
9767 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 11:32 am to
quote:

I just watched a Robert Barnes rant on this and he carved up a lot of it




Balldowasher Barnes is not credible.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87347 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 11:33 am to
quote:

Why does everything have to be some conspiracy. You list the CIA here for what reason? To make it look like this was fake? These people took money from a Russian source to promote a narrative driven by the source. The CIA was not involved in that chain. There is this like cognitive dissonance among RW people where absolutely everything is fake/nothing is real. It is like watching a cult in real time. Truly amazing to witness a bunch of free thinkers all think the same exact thing


Both things can be true, TBH

Our RW circles are way too quick to kneejerk determine that it's an inside job or the experts are lying to us. Sometimes, Russian intelligence is just doing what Russian intelligence does. Sometimes the experts are right and they're trying to do their best with a noble goal of helping the most people (even if with blinders on to unintended consequences or potential manipulation, etc.).

BUT, plenty of things involving international intrigue will have US intelligence fingerprints on them if/when we know the full story. Is it completely unrealistic that some CIA or western intelligence asset gets into these Russian disinformation efforts and influences them? I don't know how anyone who is an amateur student of US intelligence history could say that with confidence.
Posted by Sweep Da Leg
Member since Sep 2013
3601 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 11:34 am to
quote:

jclem11


Boy you’ve fallen more than funbumch. Just go ahead and vote for Kamala
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
25893 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Boy you’ve fallen more than funbumch. Just go ahead and vote for Kamala


He has been shite for a while now.
This post was edited on 9/6/24 at 11:36 am
Posted by Old Money
LSU
Member since Sep 2012
41778 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 11:44 am to
quote:

BUT, plenty of things involving international intrigue will have US intelligence fingerprints on them if/when we know the full story. Is it completely unrealistic that some CIA or western intelligence asset gets into these Russian disinformation efforts and influences them? I don't know how anyone who is an amateur student of US intelligence history could say that with confidence.


I agree its not completely unrealistic since we dont know the full story, but to flat out immediately jump to the conclusion everything is fake and gay/CIA every single time is just laughable. No point in actually looking into anything if you write it off immediately and let your twitter circle dictate your thoughts.
Posted by Old Money
LSU
Member since Sep 2012
41778 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 11:49 am to
quote:

I just watched a Robert Barnes rant on this


Something more people should do is stop filling your head with other peoples thoughts. Come to your own conclusions with as little outside influence as possible. If you are a person of even average intellect, you shouldnt let others fill your head with their thoughts. A good chance you may be smarter than they are...
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87347 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 11:51 am to
I'm with you. Personally, I struggle with it.

Naturally, I respect authority, I'm a rule follower, etc. I like structure and order. I don't believe in romanticized notions that the US was always a good actor or that our intelligence apparatus never engaged in awful stuff, etc.

BUT, I do think we previously lived in an era of somewhat unspoken rules in that regard, where you didn't go too far or if we did test the boundary there were levels of subtlety involved, and I see those increasingly collapsing in the current age. Both due to boldness of the actors and the public's ability to get information more easily. I've heard intelligence folks from the Cold War era talk about this in the IC context (breakdown of "norms").

I think the same is true with other institutions, the motivators that were once a comfort against unpredictable actions (like, profit motivation) have started to crumble at times under the weight of ideology. Admittedly, it's mixed with profit motivation in the ESG era. We had a long discussion on the OT yesterday about trusting the medical community in this era, and one of the points I raised is that when the CDC tells your 6 month old to get a COVID shot but 75%+ of the country's pediatricians are quietly ignoring that guidance (including many progressive ones) - it begs the question of whether it's really possible that a government agency might be motivated by something other than the absolute best decision making for the health of small children. Which is a pretty crazy place to be.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
68360 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 11:52 am to
Russiagate and the Ukraine impeachment were intel setups, how can you not be skeptical?

To your other post, Barnes is the only alt-right guy would say I follow. Maybe Bongino once in a while if he fits that category. I tend to trust what I consider the alt-leftists (Greenwald, Taibbi, Aaron Mate, Michael Tracey) as most intellectually consistent. How do you form your opinions? By not reading anything?
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
82332 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 11:52 am to

Bongino is tearing arse on everyone who has fallen for this FBI/DOJ op.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
68360 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 11:54 am to
Old Money says don't trust him, form your own conclusions!
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87347 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 12:00 pm to
Anyone who obviously exploits the outrage of their listeners/viewers/followers for profit is someone we should be skeptical of.

I'm sure Dan Bongino and I are kindred spirits on most things, but there is still an inherent conflict of interest when his livelihood depends on clicks and getting me worked up.

Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
82332 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 12:00 pm to

We can't trust the FBI who misled the public on Hunter's laptop.
Posted by AU86
Member since Aug 2009
26257 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 12:01 pm to
When the MSM is held accountable for it's lies and bias get back to me.
Government agencies have used and colluded with the MSM to push their agenda to influence elections.
Shouldn't they be held accountable?
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
82332 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 12:04 pm to

We are in a zero trust environment.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

We can't trust the FBI who misled the public on Hunter's laptop.

The non-indicted principals involved don't seem to be disputing the facts.

Tim Pool just said he was a patsy.
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram