- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
He said nobody has a "right" to that return, which is true. He's not specifically talking about this in the abstract. He's not making a good point, mind you, but the title misses what he's trying to say (poorly)
Why is it not the least bit surprising that you’re desperately trying to rationalize what this loon is saying?
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
I feel like this is the perfect time for the SFP meme:
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
Doesn’t it sound like communism? No other state outside of California has shite like that written in law
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:42 pm to DiamondDog
I read about it 2-3 years ago I believe on a property management group on Facebook. NY & Ca have very very different laws than the rest of the country. Landlords are abandoning NY. That’s just one of many insane laws. Their eviction process is a whole other animal
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:43 pm to SPEEDY
Thats powerbottom 
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:48 pm to beerJeep
quote:
quote:
He said nobody has a "right" to that return, which is true. He's not specifically talking about this in the abstract.
Dude come on. Sttttoooooppppppppp.
It is clear as day he means that no one should make double digits ROI period. As in by law. As in illegal. As in the govt takes it.
Sttttttooooopppppppppppppppppp
SloMoFo....he/she/it is approaching the outer limits of obtuse and nonsensical commentary.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
He said nobody has a "right" to that return, which is true. He's not specifically talking about this in the abstract.
Sometimes it’s best to put aside attorney mindset for a common sense one.
Yes we don’t have an actual right to get a 12% return as in a guarantee. We do have a right to pursue a 12% return
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:53 pm to SPEEDY
Once again it’s time for a civil war frick all those mother frickers
Posted on 7/18/26 at 9:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
He said nobody has a "right" to that return, which is true. He's not specifically talking about this in the abstract.
But he is saying the government has the right to make sure that they do not (by freezing rents). He is effectively saying that the government has the right to determine what the return on iinvestment is for landlords. What he is too stupid to realize is that this is how you guarantee a housing shortage and poor living conditions.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 9:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
Thanks for the clariflication - it absolves the verbiage of the comment discussed but not his motive.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 9:42 pm to SPEEDY
So, don't buy rental in NY, put it in the market instead. Brilliant strategy to attract investors by NY. The guy will bankrupt the city in 2 years.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 9:46 pm to SPEEDY
Posted on 7/18/26 at 9:49 pm to BurlesonCountyAg
quote:
feel like this is the perfect time for the SFP meme:
It's really not
Lots of people showing ignorance in a major way
I'm trying to help them not look dumb
Posted on 7/18/26 at 9:51 pm to ChEgrad
quote:
But he is saying the government has the right to make sure that they do not (by freezing rents).
That's already the law.
quote:
He is effectively saying that the government has the right to determine what the return on iinvestment is for landlords
That's been the law in NYC since 1969
quote:
What he is too stupid to realize is that this is how you guarantee a housing shortage and poor living conditions.
Yes, but that's not what OP chose to discuss
Posted on 7/18/26 at 10:11 pm to SPEEDY
quote:
We don’t think that anyone should have a constitutional right to double-digit returns on their investment.”
Nancy Pelosi would laugh in this guy's face and call him a lightweight.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 12:06 am to SlowFlowPro
YOU said no one deserves 12% return on an investment, you are the one looking dumb
Posted on 7/19/26 at 12:51 am to ChineseBandit58
Agreed in large part. It does appear, however, that Marco Rubio and now deceased Sen Graham have not been on the take when they could have been.
Unfortunately, all of the prominent Dems appear to have been the inside-trading, lying, money-grubbing whores we have all long suspected.
ETA: and so have most Republicans, to their great shame
Unfortunately, all of the prominent Dems appear to have been the inside-trading, lying, money-grubbing whores we have all long suspected.
ETA: and so have most Republicans, to their great shame
This post was edited on 7/19/26 at 12:59 am
Posted on 7/19/26 at 1:03 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
You are the perfect example of the legal "profession", paid by the word.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 7:23 am to RohanGonzales
Trump bought some old buildings in 1981 and tried a different strategy to get the rent control tenants to move out......
Didnt work, the city stopped him, but it is quite funny, and shows the foolishness of rent control.
Rent stabilized apts in Manhattan are about 2 grand or more per month cheaper than the average rent and it is about 44% of total apts.
quote:
When tenants resisted, Trump proposed offering the vacant apartments to the city as transitional housing for homeless people. He dubbed the proposed complex the "Trump Chateau for the Indigent"
Didnt work, the city stopped him, but it is quite funny, and shows the foolishness of rent control.
Rent stabilized apts in Manhattan are about 2 grand or more per month cheaper than the average rent and it is about 44% of total apts.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News