- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Not the Bee - Fed judge blocks RFK from banning artificial dyes in food
Posted on 12/26/25 at 6:27 pm to SallysHuman
Posted on 12/26/25 at 6:27 pm to SallysHuman
How come I knew the Judge looked like this … gap included. And to the phucken phagget that’s been down voting this thread PHUCKU
1
Posted on 12/26/25 at 6:52 pm to CAD703X
What the frick
Posted on 12/26/25 at 6:54 pm to CAD703X
Check her bank accounts. And her family.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 6:57 pm to CAD703X
quote:
Swear to God Trump should sign an EO requiring women to get abortions so Fed judges would ban abortion nationwide.
Genius
Posted on 12/26/25 at 7:20 pm to Cornpoptiger
quote:
And to the phucken phagget that’s been down voting this thread PHUCKU
I have three ideas who that may be, lol.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 7:31 pm to CAD703X
Rather than sky-screaming, could we just ask and answer one question?
What statute gives RFK authority to unilaterally ban any product or additive?
It seems to me that this is the first step in analyzing this situation.
What statute gives RFK authority to unilaterally ban any product or additive?
It seems to me that this is the first step in analyzing this situation.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 7:40 pm to CAD703X
quote:
Muh democracy is at stake if we ban artificial dyes!
I'm sure the decision that the FOOD and Drug Administration can't ban a toxic food additive is based on sound legal analysis by a brilliant jurist
Posted on 12/26/25 at 7:41 pm to CAD703X
Do it anyway. They did.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 8:20 pm to SantaFe
quote:
That 'judge' has no standing.
She's using the legal principle of virum aurantium mal.
This post was edited on 12/26/25 at 8:21 pm
Posted on 12/26/25 at 8:49 pm to TerryDawg03
Many judges dont do their jobs any more. They only rule by how they feel and money. Its time to reset everything.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 9:41 pm to CAD703X
I don't think they should be allowed to ban dyes.
However, if they are causing issues, anyone using them should be sued to hell and back to the point of not being able to do business.
If you rely on the government to make things illegal, you're basically removing responsibility from companies as things are "Government Approved". Hold the people accountable and give the proceeds to those who were harmed - sue them.
However, if they are causing issues, anyone using them should be sued to hell and back to the point of not being able to do business.
If you rely on the government to make things illegal, you're basically removing responsibility from companies as things are "Government Approved". Hold the people accountable and give the proceeds to those who were harmed - sue them.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 9:49 pm to 3down10
Okay ddt and lead here we go!
Posted on 12/26/25 at 9:55 pm to Jbird
yep. “Don’t ban it, just sue them” assumes corporations won’t spend billions ensuring you can never quite prove causation and history suggests that they absolutely will. And DDT and lead got ultimately got regulated because doubt worked too well, foiling legal liability.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 9:59 pm to TigerDoc
Crazy.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News