- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Not sure why pro-choice folk are up in arms the California/Louisiana abortion pill case
Posted on 2/6/26 at 11:28 am to ShreveportHog94
Posted on 2/6/26 at 11:28 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:uh, no
They think a sky fairy molded a little baby and put it in the belly of expecting mothers.
quote:they are of interest to me
Facts are not of interest to them.
did the doctor prescribe medication legally to the actual patient or did he not? seems simple enough to ascertain
if he had direct contact from the woman herself (and not by email) requesting a means to terminate a pregnancy, and the doctor determined that it was medically sound to issue a prescription, then the lawsuit has no merit
0
Posted on 2/6/26 at 11:32 am to ShreveportHog94
I could support a gun shop in Louisiana advertising heavily in California for the sale of 30 round 223 magazines cheap, and mailed wrapped in aluminum foil, in plain packages.
And the good coonasses. could tell California to take a hike when they protest.
And the good coonasses. could tell California to take a hike when they protest.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 11:48 am to Trevaylin
quote:
I could support a gun shop in Louisiana advertising heavily in California for the sale of 30 round 223 magazines cheap, and mailed wrapped in aluminum foil, in plain packages.
That's the exact thought process I had.
Same difference.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 11:55 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
I can guarantee
You've already proven you don't do the bare minimum of reading up on a subject before inanely blathering about it. Your "guarantee" is worthless.
At least you've calmed down enough to type coherent sentences.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 12:00 pm to RedStickFox
quote:
He didn't slip her the pills. She was "coerced" in to taking them and they were ordered with her information and her email address. The Dr. did nothing wrong that I can see. If the guy forced her to take the pills against her will then of course he should be charged, but he hasn't been charged with a crime.
Are the pills legal in LA or not? If they aren't, even if the doctor had a consultation with her, did he not still violate the law?
Posted on 2/6/26 at 12:02 pm to ShreveportHog94
Why would a Dr.send a prescription drug for women to a man? Why wouldn't a doctor want to see and hear from the female before sending out a prescription?
This is not so much about abortion as it is about a doctor being criminally flippant about his responsibilities that come with being able to prescribe drugs.
This is not so much about abortion as it is about a doctor being criminally flippant about his responsibilities that come with being able to prescribe drugs.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 12:13 pm to ShreveportHog94
Putting aside your ideology for a bit. Do you honestly think it is wise to allow doctors to provide abortifacients to their “patients” without any in-person consultation or extremely clear instructions?
Women have died after taking these pills due to confusion, the abortion process going wrong, etc.
Women have died after taking these pills due to confusion, the abortion process going wrong, etc.
quote:
supporters of legal abortion have politicized chemical abortion at the expense of women’s health and safety, even as this type of abortion becomes more common and regulations around it have become far less careful. According to the most recent estimates from the Guttmacher Institute, chemical abortions account for nearly two-thirds of all abortions in the U.S. each year, a figure that has been on the rise in the wake of state pro-life laws enacted after the 2022 Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
Under the Biden administration, the FDA loosened its safety protocols to permit women to obtain chemical-abortion drugs without ever seeing a physician in person, or even without consulting a physician at all. Previously, the FDA required that women take mifepristone “only in a clinic, medical office, or hospital, by or under the supervision of a physician, able to assess the gestational age of an embryo and to diagnose ectopic pregnancies.” Women can now obtain chemical abortions via telemedicine and the mail, as well as from any “certified prescriber,” a category that includes non-physicians such as physician assistants. This exposes women to a number of risks, especially in cases of an undiagnosed ectopic pregnancy or if a pregnancy is further along than a woman believes. In such cases, chemical-abortion drugs could cause severe hemorrhaging or other complications requiring hospitalization and surgery.
This post was edited on 2/6/26 at 12:14 pm
Posted on 2/6/26 at 12:16 pm to lionward2014
quote:
Are the pills legal in LA or not? If they aren't, even if the doctor had a consultation with her, did he not still violate the law?
I never claimed he didn't break the law. Im merely pointing out that your side is lying about almost all of the details to make it seem as though this dr was doing it against her will. That's a lie.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 12:17 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Progressives went from wanting abortion to be “safe, legal, and rare” to “unsafe, legal, and plentiful”
Demented losers
We all know Shreveporthog94 supports abortion because his 4 inch penis has been inside every vagina in Shreveport and he doesn’t want to have consequences for his sexual insanity
Demented losers
We all know Shreveporthog94 supports abortion because his 4 inch penis has been inside every vagina in Shreveport and he doesn’t want to have consequences for his sexual insanity
Posted on 2/6/26 at 12:24 pm to RedStickFox
quote:
your side
Grow up. I have, and will continue to, bashed Murril and Landry plenty when they do dumb shite. Likewise, when the blind squirrels find a nut, I will support them. This isn't a team sport.
quote:
lying about almost all of the details to make it seem as though this dr was doing it against her will. That's a lie.
Yes or no: it is illegal to sell, prescribe, dispensed, distribute, or deliver abortion pills to anyone in LA.
If yes (the right answer), why should this doctor not then be prosecuted under the state law he knowingly and intentionally violated?
Posted on 2/6/26 at 12:25 pm to Bard
quote:
You've already proven you don't do the bare minimum of reading up on a subject before inanely blathering about it. Your "guarantee" is worthless.
Don’t have to. The opposite of what is posted on this far right Nazi porn bar is the objective truth. No reason to ever provide any of you with the benefit of the doubt.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 12:35 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
I'm actually thrilled that one of the 2028 Democratic front-runners is fighting on this hill because it will show the country just how fricking far left the democrat party is on the abortion issue.
Some are to far gone.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 12:36 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:
No reason to ever provide any of you with the benefit of the doubt.
I'm fine with you never giving the benefit of the doubt to anyone, but don't confuse that with ignoring objective truth and fact.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 12:41 pm to David_DJS
The fact is the narrative that the op made up from thin air blew up in his face in less than 2 pages.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 12:42 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
This was as easy to see through as schools are putting kitty litter boxes in bathrooms. Another thing that was overwhelming accepted as facts on this board.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 12:55 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
The doctor apparently knew about the man’s plans.
That’s quite the accusation. What backs it up?
Posted on 2/6/26 at 1:03 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:his narrative was backed up with same proof that was provided in ‘blowing it up in his face’
The fact is the narrative that the op made up from thin air blew up in his face in less than 2 pages.
that is to say, an anonymous poster’s assertion and nothing more
if you can “guarantee that no doctor sent abortion pills to a man to end a pregnancy a mother did not want to terminate” it should be relatively simple to provide some documentation
Posted on 2/6/26 at 1:15 pm to ShreveportHog94
Which facts of the OP are wrong?
Fact: the doctor sent the pills to the husband. Doctor never even had a phone convo with the pregnant wife
Fact: the doctor sent the pills to the husband. Doctor never even had a phone convo with the pregnant wife
Posted on 2/6/26 at 1:32 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:
This dumb count sent a warrant for a doctor in NY over a year ago so it’s a good thing we have a fresh one to laugh at.
Where did you get your legal education?
Posted on 2/6/26 at 1:33 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
His wallet
His choice
His choice
This post was edited on 2/6/26 at 1:34 pm
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News