Started By
Message

re: Not sure if people realize this, but the Electoral College is on the chopping block now

Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:30 pm to
Posted by Django Unchained
Member since Sep 2025
1372 posts
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:30 pm to
Oh wow…. States like California and New York can create any number of votes to run up the score.

You really don’t see the issue in moving away from the EC?!?

Posted by Nurbis
Member since May 2020
2559 posts
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

What are you so afraid of? If Republican policies were truly working and resonating with voters, you wouldn’t be so worried about being outvoted.


I am sure the millions of illegals allowed to vote illegally in blue states are not a factor at all in their popular vote scheme.
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
90838 posts
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

A simple challenge to the constitutionality of the EC would simply have to make its way to the court and it would. The EC would then be deemed unconstitutional.


so in your hypothetical a procedure written in Article 2 in the original Constitution would be ruled Unconstitutional?

you want to pause and reconsider that hypothetical?
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
90838 posts
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

Not sure if people realize this, but the Electoral College is on the chopping block now


would require an amendment to the Constitution for that to happen
Posted by Jrv2damac
Member since Mar 2004
73902 posts
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:47 pm to
You sure got them with this concern troll.
Posted by GeauxTigers123
Member since Feb 2007
3875 posts
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

Yes but they should also be aware that Trump won the popular vote without stepping foot to campaign in Cali or NY or IL. If we used popular vote instead of EC all things would not be as they are now.



That isn't true. I know he went to NYC (cause the libs said that made him a Nazi like some rally from the 30s). He very well may have gone to the other two but I would have to check.
Posted by ParkRanger
The Rockies
Member since Dec 2025
453 posts
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

California, New York, and Illinois alone should not be able to determine the presidency by running up the score there.


You didn’t think this through, did you? There are far more republican and independent voters in those 3 states than anywhere else. Democrats carry less than half of the percentages in those states.
Posted by Islander
Orange Beach, AL
Member since Aug 2012
379 posts
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

I'll admit it - the Left is far better than the Right at leading retards en-masse. That's why the EC is important.


Trump and MAGA say "hold my beer"....
Posted by ParkRanger
The Rockies
Member since Dec 2025
453 posts
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

I am sure the millions of illegals allowed to vote illegally in blue states are not a factor at all in their popular vote scheme.


Ahh, everyone loves a dead talking point. If this were true, why aren’t the republicans up in arms this cycle casting fraud accusations?
Posted by Rip Torner
Member since Jul 2023
4627 posts
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:51 pm to
I am still waiting on your list of Republican policies that have failed you and the Democrat policies that have been or will be successful, ignorant fool
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
14943 posts
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:52 pm to
quote:


What percent of Republican Presidents won the popular vote? I suspect a minority.

What percent of Democrat Presidents lost the popular vote? I also suspect a minority.

While its not a guarantee to work in their favor, history has shown a policy like this would very likely work in their favor more often then not, which is why they're pushing it.


But when the worm turns, they will achieve their self-arse fricking

Posted by RockNHorse
Member since Jul 2026
178 posts
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

Rush Limbaugh talked about this kind of stuff.


And quite a few since had joined him carrying that torch.

If we'd had principled Americans like them in office this country would never have wound up where we find it today.
Posted by ParkRanger
The Rockies
Member since Dec 2025
453 posts
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:55 pm to
You’re the idiot begging for attention here. You can do your own homework and scratch your head after you figure out how pathetic you are.

Republicans had FULL CONTROL for 2 years and did absolutely nothing to improve the lives of everyday Americans. This election proved that people are fed up.
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
12029 posts
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:56 pm to
Repeal the 17th Amendment
Posted by armytiger96
Member since Sep 2007
3435 posts
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

Not sure if you meant to phrase it like this, but 48 states already do this. It's called winner take all.


I think its pretty obvious that National is implied in his comment about popular vote.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
143939 posts
Posted on 11/5/26 at 5:00 pm to
They will do this, open borders wide and we will likely see sharia law
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
21847 posts
Posted on 11/5/26 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

States have always had leeway in how they assign Electoral votes


This is correct, the power is vested in the state and as such it can’t be given away to an entity outside of the state. If you read the compact there are rules that govern when and how states are allowed to leave. That in and of itself is at odds with the constitution because a state legislature can say we are going to withdraw from the compact and award our electors this way and the other states can say no you can’t. There is x amount of time before the election, you can’t change anything. So who has the power in this circumstance? The constitution says the states have the power but the states have ceded power over to a compact.

The other side of the coin is just as interesting. Let’s say a republican wins the popular vote, but loses a number of these states. Can they then be compelled to award their electors to the republican or can they decide to switch horses mid stream and ignore the compact in a close race where it could put him in the White House?
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
23261 posts
Posted on 11/5/26 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

Trump and MAGA say "hold my beer"...

I'm open to being convinced. Give us the Trump/MAGA equivalent of the Left convincing more than half of Democrats that socialism is a better economic system than capitalism.
Posted by burger bearcat
Member since Oct 2020
10607 posts
Posted on 11/5/26 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

would require an amendment to the Constitution for that to happen


Oh yea and then if they do it anyways? Then what? Who stops it?
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
90838 posts
Posted on 11/5/26 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

Oh yea and then if they do it anyways? Then what? Who stops it?

the process is steep



An amendment can be proposed through either of these methods:
• By Congress: A two-thirds supermajority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate (this is the only method that has ever been used to propose amendments).
• By Constitutional Convention: Congress must call a national convention for proposing amendments if requested by the legislatures of two-thirds of the states (34 out of 50 states). This method has never been used.

Step 2: Ratification (Two Ways)

Once proposed, the amendment must be ratified by the states using one of two methods chosen by Congress:
• State Legislatures: Approval by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50 states).
• State Ratifying Conventions: Approval by special conventions held in three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50 states). This method has been used only once, for the 21st Amendment.

Key Details of the Process

• No Presidential Role: The President of the United States has no formal role in the constitutional amendment process; a joint resolution from Congress does not require a presidential signature.
• State Role and Limits: A state legislature cannot change or alter the language of a proposed amendment; doing so invalidates its ratification. A governor's signature is not required.
• Official Certification: Once three-fourths of the states have ratified the amendment, the Archivist of the United States issues a formal certification through the National Archives, and it officially becomes part of the Constitution.
• Unamendable Provision: The Constitution explicitly protects equal suffrage for each state in the Senate, meaning no state can be deprived of its equal vote in the Senate without its consent.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram