
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Not sure if people realize this, but the Electoral College is on the chopping block now
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:30 pm to Robin Masters
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:30 pm to Robin Masters
Oh wow…. States like California and New York can create any number of votes to run up the score.
You really don’t see the issue in moving away from the EC?!?
You really don’t see the issue in moving away from the EC?!?
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:38 pm to ParkRanger
quote:
What are you so afraid of? If Republican policies were truly working and resonating with voters, you wouldn’t be so worried about being outvoted.
I am sure the millions of illegals allowed to vote illegally in blue states are not a factor at all in their popular vote scheme.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:44 pm to Rip Torner
quote:
A simple challenge to the constitutionality of the EC would simply have to make its way to the court and it would. The EC would then be deemed unconstitutional.
so in your hypothetical a procedure written in Article 2 in the original Constitution would be ruled Unconstitutional?
you want to pause and reconsider that hypothetical?
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:45 pm to burger bearcat
quote:
Not sure if people realize this, but the Electoral College is on the chopping block now
would require an amendment to the Constitution for that to happen
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:47 pm to burger bearcat
You sure got them with this concern troll.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:48 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
Yes but they should also be aware that Trump won the popular vote without stepping foot to campaign in Cali or NY or IL. If we used popular vote instead of EC all things would not be as they are now.
That isn't true. I know he went to NYC (cause the libs said that made him a Nazi like some rally from the 30s). He very well may have gone to the other two but I would have to check.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:49 pm to teke184
quote:
California, New York, and Illinois alone should not be able to determine the presidency by running up the score there.
You didn’t think this through, did you? There are far more republican and independent voters in those 3 states than anywhere else. Democrats carry less than half of the percentages in those states.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:50 pm to David_DJS
quote:
I'll admit it - the Left is far better than the Right at leading retards en-masse. That's why the EC is important.
Trump and MAGA say "hold my beer"....
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:51 pm to Nurbis
quote:
I am sure the millions of illegals allowed to vote illegally in blue states are not a factor at all in their popular vote scheme.
Ahh, everyone loves a dead talking point. If this were true, why aren’t the republicans up in arms this cycle casting fraud accusations?
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:51 pm to ParkRanger
I am still waiting on your list of Republican policies that have failed you and the Democrat policies that have been or will be successful, ignorant fool
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:52 pm to Azkiger
quote:
What percent of Republican Presidents won the popular vote? I suspect a minority.
What percent of Democrat Presidents lost the popular vote? I also suspect a minority.
While its not a guarantee to work in their favor, history has shown a policy like this would very likely work in their favor more often then not, which is why they're pushing it.
But when the worm turns, they will achieve their self-arse fricking
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:53 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
Rush Limbaugh talked about this kind of stuff.
And quite a few since had joined him carrying that torch.
If we'd had principled Americans like them in office this country would never have wound up where we find it today.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:55 pm to Rip Torner
You’re the idiot begging for attention here. You can do your own homework and scratch your head after you figure out how pathetic you are.
Republicans had FULL CONTROL for 2 years and did absolutely nothing to improve the lives of everyday Americans. This election proved that people are fed up.
Republicans had FULL CONTROL for 2 years and did absolutely nothing to improve the lives of everyday Americans. This election proved that people are fed up.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 4:57 pm to nealnan8
quote:
Not sure if you meant to phrase it like this, but 48 states already do this. It's called winner take all.
I think its pretty obvious that National is implied in his comment about popular vote.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 5:00 pm to burger bearcat
They will do this, open borders wide and we will likely see sharia law
Posted on 11/5/26 at 5:00 pm to Asharad
quote:
States have always had leeway in how they assign Electoral votes
This is correct, the power is vested in the state and as such it can’t be given away to an entity outside of the state. If you read the compact there are rules that govern when and how states are allowed to leave. That in and of itself is at odds with the constitution because a state legislature can say we are going to withdraw from the compact and award our electors this way and the other states can say no you can’t. There is x amount of time before the election, you can’t change anything. So who has the power in this circumstance? The constitution says the states have the power but the states have ceded power over to a compact.
The other side of the coin is just as interesting. Let’s say a republican wins the popular vote, but loses a number of these states. Can they then be compelled to award their electors to the republican or can they decide to switch horses mid stream and ignore the compact in a close race where it could put him in the White House?
Posted on 11/5/26 at 5:07 pm to Islander
quote:
Trump and MAGA say "hold my beer"...
I'm open to being convinced. Give us the Trump/MAGA equivalent of the Left convincing more than half of Democrats that socialism is a better economic system than capitalism.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 5:20 pm to supatigah
quote:
would require an amendment to the Constitution for that to happen
Oh yea and then if they do it anyways? Then what? Who stops it?
Posted on 11/5/26 at 5:26 pm to burger bearcat
quote:
Oh yea and then if they do it anyways? Then what? Who stops it?
the process is steep
An amendment can be proposed through either of these methods:
• By Congress: A two-thirds supermajority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate (this is the only method that has ever been used to propose amendments).
• By Constitutional Convention: Congress must call a national convention for proposing amendments if requested by the legislatures of two-thirds of the states (34 out of 50 states). This method has never been used.
Step 2: Ratification (Two Ways)
Once proposed, the amendment must be ratified by the states using one of two methods chosen by Congress:
• State Legislatures: Approval by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50 states).
• State Ratifying Conventions: Approval by special conventions held in three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50 states). This method has been used only once, for the 21st Amendment.
Key Details of the Process
• No Presidential Role: The President of the United States has no formal role in the constitutional amendment process; a joint resolution from Congress does not require a presidential signature.
• State Role and Limits: A state legislature cannot change or alter the language of a proposed amendment; doing so invalidates its ratification. A governor's signature is not required.
• Official Certification: Once three-fourths of the states have ratified the amendment, the Archivist of the United States issues a formal certification through the National Archives, and it officially becomes part of the Constitution.
• Unamendable Provision: The Constitution explicitly protects equal suffrage for each state in the Senate, meaning no state can be deprived of its equal vote in the Senate without its consent.

Popular
Back to top


1








