supatigah

no, what will happen is tariffs on the incoming COST will generate money for the Gov. Apple will have to decide how much they want to pass off the higher material costs in the consumer price. Apple profits will dip a little and they will make that up in the bottom line by reducing their spend in places like China.

I think a good bit is their kids or grandkids give them a crass Tshirt as a gag gift and they end up wearing it

I dont really care one way or the other about the knicks
it is a cool story though and good for Thibs

taking care of business when you are supposed to is hopefully a sign of a team coming into its own

clean up the roster some more this offseason and I feel good about next year

madueke is so frustrating at times

quote:

---

BC (Before Clinton) I paid little attention to politics and pretty much cruised thru LSU in the '80s. Thanx to media indoctrination I was pretty much a "Go along w/the Liberals" type.

Then came Clinton. He was such a scumbag, yet the MSM pushed him like the Messiah. I began to see just how biased and corrupt the system was. I started listening to Rush Limbaugh. He covered stories the MSM ignored or ridiculed.

Also around this time we began hearing about something called "Political Correctness", now known as Woke. An Orwellian seizure of power - cultural as well as political - by the left.

There is an old saying that there is one decade in your life that shapes you politically. For me it was the Clinton years.

---

quoted in awe :bow:
same for me

I had a lab job in college and I listened to Rush Limbaugh everyday
changed my views on politics forever

quote:

---

Tim Howard explained it to you pretty well, that's never a red without a swing and there was zero swing

---

jackson put his forearm into the oppononent’s face for no reason on a 50/50 ball

it was stupid and very costly for the club

I too saw it on a plane and could barely finish it

Denzel's NY accent was bad

The story is a rehash of the original point by point but way worse

quote:

---

The Executive could not deny a security clearance due to someone's race. We all agree on that, correct?

---

does their race make them untrustworthy with State secrets? why?

quote:

---

They couldn't limit security clearances to men. We all agree on that, correct?

---

does their gender make them untrustworthy with State secrets? why?

if I am the keeper of the info in the Executive and I deem you untrustworthy then I dont have to give you access to the information

sue all you want, you won’t win

this is a pretty straight forward process and transaction to extend status and access to protected information controlled by the Executive

simple discrimination is not a disqualifier when there are so many plausible reasons to disqualify anyone or anything as “untrustworthy”

especially a DC Law Firm

I am enjoying this taking care of business version of the Blues we are seeing today