- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Newsweek: An Informer Told the FBI What Docs Trump Was Hiding, and Where
Posted on 8/10/22 at 4:25 pm to jatilen
Posted on 8/10/22 at 4:25 pm to jatilen
quote:
contained abundant and persuasive detail that Trump continued to possess the relevant records in violation of federal law, and that investigators had sufficient information to prove that those records were located at Mar-a-Lago—including the detail that they were contained in a specific safe in a specific room.
A specific safe that turned out to be empty.
A human source like the one the entire Russian collusion BS was set up with?
What a complete and utter fabrication.
1
Posted on 8/10/22 at 4:30 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Every FBI agent has the intelligence and training to understand that if a warrant is limited to one room and they search another room and find great evidence, they have ruined the admissibility of that evidence by stepping outside the affidavit.
If your goal is to have him under investigation for political damage - and potentially under indictment - mission accomplished.
That approach makes sense through the lense of 2024. They may not care about a conviction.
Don’t be surprised if they find a judge that permits that evidence.
This post was edited on 8/10/22 at 4:32 pm
Posted on 8/10/22 at 4:31 pm to jatilen
Maybe I watch too much law & order, but if the informant said document A was in a safe in room B, shouldn't the search warrant be limited to that room and safe only? Why did the search warrant include the 1st lady's clothes?
Posted on 8/10/22 at 4:33 pm to CubsFanBudMan
quote:You do watch too much Law & Order. Warrants are seldom that specific.
Maybe I watch too much law & order, but if the informant said document A was in a safe in room B, shouldn't the search warrant be limited to that room and safe only?
quote:It did not. It likely provided for a search of the entire premises. Her dressing room (oddly enough) is located on the premises.
Why did the search warrant include the 1st lady's clothes?
This post was edited on 8/10/22 at 4:34 pm
Posted on 8/10/22 at 4:39 pm to jatilen
The police of various agencies have historically planted evidence...take the EBRSO..back in the 60 & 70s, were doing so with impunity. Pot, small amounts, was their weapon of choice...in addition, going in and grabbing people out of their houses without a warrant...in fact, I may come back with others..
This post was edited on 8/10/22 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 8/10/22 at 4:51 pm to AggieHank86
While we all appreciate the vigor of your Fedsplaining, no one knows what was in that warrant because the feds wouldn't show it to the family or their counsel on site.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 4:53 pm to SalE
quote:
The police of various agencies have historically planted evidence.
Why would they deny the attorney the right to observe the search? Why request all security cameras be turned off?
Posted on 8/10/22 at 4:53 pm to AggieHank86
Goddamn you enjoy looking dumb, especially spicy with that pseudo-condecending tone.
Motherfricker, you make aggies cringe.
Motherfricker, you make aggies cringe.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 4:55 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Kash Patel said yesterday that Trump declassified all the documents he took home prior to his term of being president expired.
Did Patel offer any actual evidence of that being the case?
Posted on 8/10/22 at 4:58 pm to Eli Goldfinger
quote:
The docs are in the toilet!!!!!!
The FBI belongs there as well…aka a good match!
Posted on 8/10/22 at 5:05 pm to GumboPot
quote:
quote:
Both senior government officials say the raid was scheduled with no political motive
The fact that you have to say this means the public doesn't have confidence that the FBI/DOJ isn't politically motivated.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 5:08 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:Well, BBond is a former AUSA, he is usually on "your side," and we are basically in agreement as to what it almost certainly says.
While we all appreciate the vigor of your Fedsplaining, no one knows what was in that warrant because the feds wouldn't show it to the family or their counsel on site.
So, you can listen to folks who certainly know more than you, or you can continue your wild speculation. Your call.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 5:10 pm to 19
quote:When talking to you, there is nothing "pseudo" about it. I think you are a fricking idiot, and I interact with you accordingly.
that pseudo-condecending tone.
This post was edited on 8/10/22 at 5:11 pm
Posted on 8/10/22 at 5:17 pm to jp4lsu
Forget the validity of the warrant, that will all come out under very bright lights eventually. To me, the focus should be on the DOJ & its political role: Does the name Eric Holder ring a bell? He, as the U.S. Atty General, was the first sitting Cabinet official held in contempt of Congress for refusing to turn over documents. And ZIP happened to him. He also sent the IRS to attack conservative charities. This U.S. Atty General has even a worse reputation.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 5:18 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
or you can continue your wild speculation.
LOL. You've been speculating the scope of this warrant throughout this entire thread, clown.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 5:19 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
A specific safe that turned out to be empty. A human source like the one the entire Russian collusion BS was set up with? What a complete and utter fabrication.
They thought they had him, but they in fact, did not
Posted on 8/10/22 at 5:19 pm to jatilen
So he told them documents were in Melania's closet?
Posted on 8/10/22 at 5:27 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
If your goal is to have him under investigation for political damage - and potentially under indictment - mission accomplished.
He’s already more popular now, she if that was the goal, then they got the opposite result.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 5:29 pm to Shaft Williams
What would be hilarious is if there were actually an informant and Trump fed him some bs and the FBI shows up and the documents aren’t there and they got pissed and ransack the house.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 5:50 pm to jatilen
I guess pretending to be president has serious consequences.
Page 8 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News