re: New poll: "How likely is it that cheating affected the outcome of the 2020 election?”

quote:

---

I wish those who believe 2020 was rigged (like myself) would drill down more/be more specific when asked about this.

---

precisely - it is not impossible that the actual tabulation was somewhat accurate - but I will NEVER believe that
1 - the people had truthful information available to them on which to base a valid choice
2 - the mass bailout of ballots was conducted in accordance with state constitutions
3 - the ballot harvesting efforts were performed legally
4 - the chain of custody of the completed ballots was legally maintained
5 - the halting of the counting processes was for legitimate reasons
6 - the operations during the shutdowns were properly monitored
7 - the extension of time to process late ballots was constitutionally applied
8 - the 'curing' process for spoiled ballots was legitimately handled

And I think that if any 3 of the above had not occurred, the 'official' results would most probably have been reversed.

And furthermore, that if any ONE of the above actually occurred it would be a valid basis to initiate a full forensic audit of the entire process - especially for the specific precinct where the incident occurred.

And, if no action were taken on any of the above, that the state legislators had the constitutional duty to protect the sanctity of their own electoral process by any means they deem necessary for the situation.

And lastly, if no action were taken then as a last resort the US House of Representatives should have had the final say as to whether the election had been conducted in accordance with all available evidence.

Not one of the above items were adjudicated. anywhere. anytime. in any manner.

quote:

---

I'm not a fan of how this question is posed. How is cheating defined? In my opinion, the term "cheating" is too broadly used and I wish those who believe 2020 was rigged (like myself) would drill down more/be more specific when asked about this. I don't know how much "cheating" was involved (I don't doubt it was significant), per se, but I do know for a fact that critical states didn't follow their own laws with regard to making legal election law changes.

---

I would be interested in knowing how many of those 45% of Democrats are talking about the general election and how many are talking about the Democratic primary. Let's not forget that was rigged too.

My country club republican “friends “ don’t care either. The talk today was he was too brusque and didn’t learn anything from his 2020 loss. I asked them how they would handle the onslaught against that man for 8 years now. They don’t care.

When Trump is attacked, I am being attacked too. We need a fighter like we saw last night. There is no one else.

Let DeSantis learn from Trump for four more years then maybe he’ll be ready to maintain the fight.

You are SO right about this!

quote:

---

Can I say given the evidence presented so far, I haven't a clue.

---

You can absolutely say that you have no clue. But understand all that does is tell us you’re feeble minded.

quote:

---

precisely - it is not impossible that the actual tabulation was somewhat accurate - but I will NEVER believe that
1 - the people had truthful information available to them on which to base a valid choice
2 - the mass bailout of ballots was conducted in accordance with state constitutions
3 - the ballot harvesting efforts were performed legally
4 - the chain of custody of the completed ballots was legally maintained
5 - the halting of the counting processes was for legitimate reasons
6 - the operations during the shutdowns were properly monitored
7 - the extension of time to process late ballots was constitutionally applied
8 - the 'curing' process for spoiled ballots was legitimately handled

And I think that if any 3 of the above had not occurred, the 'official' results would most probably have been reversed.

And furthermore, that if any ONE of the above actually occurred it would be a valid basis to initiate a full forensic audit of the entire process - especially for the specific precinct where the incident occurred.

And, if no action were taken on any of the above, that the state legislators had the constitutional duty to protect the sanctity of their own electoral process by any means they deem necessary for the situation.

And lastly, if no action were taken then as a last resort the US House of Representatives should have had the final say as to whether the election had been conducted in accordance with all available evidence.

Not one of the above items were adjudicated. anywhere. anytime. in any manner.

---

That is why the "insurrection" was commenced just as the whole process of CONSTITUTIONALLY contesting the results of a POTUS election was beginning. Does nobody find it suspicious that the whole shitshow was orchestrated to shut down the EV count just as the first contest was brought to the floor? The cover was laid to shove the whole thing through in the dark of night under "extremely dangerous" circumstances, which were there to give an excuse for not havng the people see any of their blatant cheating.
The treasonous unelected bastards running this country could not have their crimes come to light, just like in November 1963 when JFK was about to unravel their gravy train.

Agreed. The difference here, why every election norm was shattered, was the extremely loose MIV rules and drop boxes. Anyone with a registered voter list, a phone book, and a little time could process and cast thousands of votes.

A week before the election I told family members that the only way that Biden wins is by cheating and even then to do so during a federal election was slim to none.

Trump had it in the bag until those late night hours.

quote:

---

Rasmussen wont disclose its methodology so its polling is whatever they want it to be.

---

i,e, "I do not like the results"

quote:

---

There are reams of indisputable factual data presented reflecting massive cheating.

---

Yea, like that they covered up the windows in Detroit so the poll watchers, if they had been standing at the windows, would have been standing 30+ feet away from where the counting was going on, couldn't see the ballots.

That kind of factual Data?