Started By
Message

re: New Mexico National Popular Vote Bill Headed to Governer's Desk

Posted on 3/13/19 at 4:39 pm to
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134887 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 4:39 pm to
Yes, that's the whole point of it
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66835 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 4:41 pm to
Ok, we’re on the same page.

My question then becomes:

Why should we care about that?

Someone is getting boned either way why should it people people living in populated states?
This post was edited on 3/13/19 at 4:43 pm
Posted by GeorgePaton
God's Country
Member since May 2017
4495 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 4:41 pm to
Then the Republic is void.
Posted by GeorgePaton
God's Country
Member since May 2017
4495 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 4:41 pm to
Then the Republic is void. It's all or none. Has to be done via a Constitutional Amendment ratified by the states.

This post was edited on 3/13/19 at 4:43 pm
Posted by Floating Change Up
Member since Dec 2013
11863 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

I am Asking why it’s better than an popular vote at representing the voice of the people.


Because when you have mega-population centers like NY and CA, then their numbers become much more powerful than rural areas. Our fore-fathers understood this and protected our country from having only heavy population centers represented in our government. Can you imagine what laws would be on the books if we did not have EC? Farmers would have basically no representation at all in the Federal Government.

States like Louisiana and Alabama would have very little voice, they would be at the of the population centers.

How could this be, you ask? Well, because those states get the heaviest voice in the House of Representatives. It gives far more power for a "Tyrant" like Donald Trump to manipulate people in the large population centers with laws that benefit their lifestyles. Manipulate the population centers, keep the power with the Tyrant's family.

If DJT was a true Tyrant like the lefties say, eliminating the EC would be the absolute worst thing in the world for the left.

quote:

Lol, you can’t defend your point.


I can defend my point just fine.

You, my friend, are the one which can not defend your ignorance for not understanding 9 grade Civics class.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66835 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 4:45 pm to
How does the constitution dictate Electors be determined?
Posted by baobabtiger
Member since May 2009
4729 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 4:45 pm to
And it will impact states like this more than most.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134887 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

Why should we care about that?

Because it keeps highly concentrated population centers from being the dominant voice of very large areas outside of those population centers. Surely you don't think people in Manhattan have the same attitude or beliefs as someone in Des Moines, right?
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
19713 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 4:53 pm to
Can't imagine this stuff would stand up to a court challenge
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66835 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 4:53 pm to
Listen I agree they Have different values

But why should we tip the scale in favor of less people?

Why should we over value anyone’s values?

Yes we need farmers. I am Pretty sure everyone knows that.

We probably would legislate them out of existence if we let the “majority” decide

And there are many other ways smaller sections of American society are represented.

Like the House. Also all States have farms. Most senators are not anti-farmers.

I understand The arguement just why is it better?
This post was edited on 3/13/19 at 5:05 pm
Posted by Bayoubred
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2011
3387 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 5:00 pm to
To answer your original question... The electoral college prevents one state from determining the President, as has already been said. The best example in history is what California is doing as a Sanctuary state. If they have their way they will be bringing in 1 million illegal aliens every year, giving them the right to vote. Even if all the other states close their borders, California would throw open the door and corrupt the entire national election.

You need to get over the popular vote issue. You don't get points for having more yards. You get points for getting into the end zone. Trumps deficit was in California. He never campaigned there because the popular vote is only yards. Not points.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134887 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

But why should we tip the scale in favor of less people?


The EC doesn't "tip the scale in favor of less people". All it does is provide a check of power against the large population centers that can use their numbers to cancel out the votes of people from a broad and different cultural/societal norm than those in the densely populated areas.

It's like people in NYC telling people in Albany that no one needs a car because public transportation is easily available where they live then they vote to ban personal vehicles. Sorry, the majority won.
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
47672 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

How does the constitution dictate Electors be determined?


It doesn't, but I'm pretty sure any Interstate Compact requires congressional approval.
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
34214 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

I can't believe people would give up their voice willingly



nobody's giving up anything, it's patently unconstitutional
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66835 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 5:15 pm to
What in the constitution prohibits it outright?

If they all decided on their own and dropped the interstate compact part and one state could do this (they don’t want to unless it matters)
This post was edited on 3/13/19 at 5:17 pm
Posted by WoWyHi
Member since Jul 2009
23339 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 5:15 pm to
So how is this trend stopped?
Posted by WoWyHi
Member since Jul 2009
23339 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

Just imagine if Trump wins the popular vote in 2020



He can't and they know this based on 2016 numbers. That's the whole reason they're doing this.
This post was edited on 3/13/19 at 5:34 pm
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66835 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 5:22 pm to
It overvalued votes in certain states for sure.

Why should a Wyoming matter more than a voter in New York, or Louisiana or Texas.

But their Elector:Voter ratio is significantly great than any other states.

And no these elections aren’t settled by Wyoming, but we aren’t representing the people
Of the country.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 5:23 pm to
Leftists will do anything to gain power

too bad most republicans are mitt romney
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134887 posts
Posted on 3/13/19 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

Why should a Wyoming matter more than a voter in New York, or Louisiana or Texas.


They quite literally don't. I don't know why you're having trouble with this. It merely gives them more equal representation. WY has 3 EC votes, NY has 29.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram