Started By
Message

NC Court of Appeals rules 65,000 ballots should NOT have counted, Dem won by 734

Posted on 7/11/26 at 10:14 am
Posted by Major Dutch Schaefer
Location: Classified
Member since Nov 2011
39445 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 10:14 am
Posted by W2NOMO
Member since Jul 2025
3004 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 10:15 am to
So the thing that wasn’t happening happened? Shocked!
Posted by tigerfootball10
Member since Sep 2005
10239 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 10:15 am to
:whoopsieDaisy:
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
21120 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 10:16 am to
So, what now?

What happens?

Nothing?
Posted by Great Plains Drifter
Flyover, U.S.A.
Member since Jul 2019
10475 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 10:25 am to
There’s a few places in this country where a Dem candidate would still legitimately win ….mainly because those areas are loaded to the gills with batshite crazy Leftist idiots.

But the modern Dems would not come remotely close to wielding the power they do across this country if we had legitimate elections.

They know that ….and that’s why they are fighting with everything they have to keep elections as much as a free-for-all and as difficult to efficiently and honestly manage as they can.
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
28795 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 10:34 am to
So does this reverse the outcome of the election?
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
17231 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 10:45 am to
That's from April, 2025.
Posted by Lawyered
The Sip
Member since Oct 2016
38634 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 10:46 am to
Not like it would’ve mattered anyway

I mean it happens everywhere !

/sarcasm
Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
3450 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 10:46 am to
quote:

So, what now? What happens? Nothing?


Nothing.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
28985 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 10:52 am to
Breaking?

The North Carolina Supreme Court reversed the court of appeal and upheld the election last year.

Republicans were trying to invalidate votes by lawful voters such as military stationed overseas. There was never a finding that the voters were not lawful voters.

Typical right wing manufactured outrage designed to keep the rage machine going.
Posted by tzimme4
Metairie
Member since Jan 2008
33679 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 10:52 am to
No because you can't assume all 65k were voted the same way. So you can't give or take away ballots from a particular nominee
Posted by GeorgePaton
God's Country
Member since May 2017
5875 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 10:55 am to
These Appeals Courts always come out with these rulings after the damage has been done.

Which only confirms what we already know - the standard modus operandi of these mafia democrats is always the same - get in that office anyway you can. Then let their army of crooked lawyers and activist liberal judges block efforts to challenge the validity of the stolen election.

Steal now, then block, deny, and stall later. I forgot to include - pay off the RINO's to betray their own constituents.

Pass the SAVE Act NOW! We need that SAVE Act in place before that November mid-term. They're going to steal some races in that election. If we fail at least we'll know who the Republican traitors are.
This post was edited on 7/11/26 at 3:27 pm
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
90989 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 10:58 am to
Haven't you lived in the same place for 50 years?

Talk about someone being in an echo chamber their entire life.


Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
28795 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 11:00 am to
quote:

No because you can't assume all 65k were voted the same way. So you can't give or take away ballots from a particular nominee



Reverse was poor phrasing on my part. But it sure seems like it should invalidate the election and the position should remain vacant until a special election can be called and held.
Posted by TigerAxeOK
In the woods and by the waters.
Member since Dec 2016
38788 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 11:05 am to
They had to fabricate sixty-five thousand fraudulent ballots just to squeak out a win by a few hundred votes.

America is RED. They just can't allow us to know it. But, the rot is so deep and thorough that they're still going to keep doing it and getting away with it.
Posted by Lutcher Lad
South of the Mason-Dixon Line
Member since Sep 2009
7756 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 11:06 am to
What? I'm shocked...no one cheats at our elections in this country! You're joking right?

NOTICE: The above reaction is strictly contructed sarcasm, in case it isn't obvious.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
51047 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 11:07 am to
We have seen example after example of this happening. And yet, we still have posters here who act like the 2020 Presidential election was as pristine as Heaven above.

Even they have to know better than what they falsely claim.


PS - If I heard later today that John Thune was headed to GTMO, I would celebrate. Of course, in a perfect world there would be about 10 other planes loaded up taking other corrupt scumbags there, too.
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
21902 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Those 65,000 voters may now have to provide proof of identity in an election

OMG, the horror!! How will the Democrats ever recover from having to show an ID?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140537 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 11:09 am to
quote:

Republicans were trying to invalidate votes by lawful voters such as military stationed overseas
Given the propensity of that base, your contention is dubious. Do you have a link?
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38201 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 11:10 am to
What’s the makeup of the 64,000 ballots?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram