Started By
Message

re: “Ms. Keyser does not refute Dr. Ford’s account" to the FBI

Posted on 10/2/18 at 11:39 am to
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
54711 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Lol I don’t refute it, but I have no recollection that it ever happened.


Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
90063 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Even the victim doesn’t have a clear memory of the event, why would the supposed witnesses?

Because it never happened.


it also blows a hole in CBF's story about Keyser hanging out with them in the house if Keyser says she has never met BK and doesnt know him
Posted by Hangit
The Green Swamp
Member since Aug 2014
46847 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 11:39 am to
I too am convinced that horrible things happened at the event that never was. The fact that it did not take place only confirms this.

Doctor Ford clearly remembers it well enough to testify to a senate committee. The fact that it didn't happen just goes to prove that the party that didn't occur was memorable.

Another WTF moment has been brought to you by the mangled remnants of a once proud party.
Posted by McChowder
Hammond
Member since Dec 2006
5752 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 11:42 am to
She also has no recollection of ever meeting BK.......anywhere.......ever.
Posted by ynlvr
Rocket City
Member since Feb 2009
5551 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 11:49 am to
Original Statement . . .
quote:

"Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford,"

She is useless to Blasey Ford's claim.
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32966 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 11:50 am to
You can't refute something that you have no knowledge of
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
24842 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 11:56 am to
Talk about putting lipstick on a sow...
Posted by TigerCoon
Member since Nov 2005
22475 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:03 pm to
Translation: I don't want to say she's crazy.. but she's crazy.
Posted by ljhog
Lake Jackson, Tx.
Member since Apr 2009
20588 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

no recollection of the incident in question

Now that's a ringing endorsement.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30152 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

she has no recollection of the incident in question


that in itself is a clear refutation, regardless of whether she "believes" she is telling the truth or not

either you can swear you were there as a witness to corroborate it, or you refute it by saying you cant swear to that
This post was edited on 10/2/18 at 12:13 pm
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
102725 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:21 pm to
Well that’s her opinion to believe it but it carries no weight without corroboration
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

keakar
You do not seem to know the definition of “refute”
quote:

prove (a statement or theory) to be wrong or false; disprove.


AGAIN, no corroboration. Confirm Kav.
This post was edited on 10/2/18 at 12:30 pm
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:32 pm to
How the hell is "I've never met Brett Kavanaugh and I don't recall ever being to a party where he was present, with or without Christine Ford." not a total refutation?

She was supposedly in a livingroom with the guy, along with Judge, Smyth, and another unknown boy, drinking and hanging out with them, according to Ford's account.


Seriously, what kind of fricking loon do you have to be to say you believe someone when they say you met Kavanaugh when you know damn well you've never met the guy??

This is beyond absurd.
Posted by Mike Honcho
North Dallas
Member since Oct 2007
2970 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

they are left in the elevator holding their metaphorical dick in their hands.


Is this the dick you were talking about?

Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Seriously, what kind of fricking loon do you have to be to say you believe someone when they say you met Kavanaugh when you know damn well you've never met the guy??
If you remember the name of every random gal you met 35 years ago, you have a memory far superior to my own ... and most think I have a decent memory.
Posted by Strannix
C.S.A.
Member since Dec 2012
53725 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:45 pm to
How can you "refute" something that you have no idea what she is talking about?

Stannix, "Kamala Harris touched my taint and Jjdoc was there"

Jjdoc, "I have no idea if this happened I was not there"

CNN "Jjdoc doesn't refute Strannix's claims!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
38003 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:48 pm to
A journalist that reports what they claim to be their gut feeling on what the truth is, as opposed to this thing called evidence, is not called a journalist. He/She/It/Shim is called a propagandist. China and North Korea are familiar with the term. Kim's sister in NoKo actually holds the very distinguished title of Minister of Propaganda.

Now think about that, and look at what the MSM wants us to be. We need to show up in stupid, ridiculous, record shattering numbers in November and Red Tsunami this alleged Blue Drip clean off the map.
Posted by indianswim
Plano, TX
Member since Jan 2010
22120 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 1:05 pm to
Ms Keyser is like

Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

If you remember the name of every random gal you met 35 years ago, you have a memory far superior to my own ... and most think I have a decent memory.

Look, dipshit... she says she never “met him”. She didn’t say she didn’t know who he was.

“I never met Brett Kavanaugh, and I never attended a party or gathering where he was present, with or without Dr. Ford.”

Clearly that is a statement of fact. She “knows” she never met him or attended a party he was at.

If she had said, “I don’t recall meeting Brett Kavanaugh, and I don’t remember if I was ever at a party where he was present.”, then you could plausibly claim the door of possibility is still open.

But that’s not what she said. She clearly knows/knew who Kavanaugh was and is stating as a matter of fact she never met him or partied with him.
Posted by Big Jim Slade
Member since Oct 2016
6341 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 2:30 pm to
Doesn’t refute it but definitely doesn’t support it. Her original statement about not knowing BK seemed much stronger.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram