- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: “Ms. Keyser does not refute Dr. Ford’s account" to the FBI
Posted on 10/2/18 at 11:39 am to The Pirate King
Posted on 10/2/18 at 11:39 am to The Pirate King
quote:
Lol I don’t refute it, but I have no recollection that it ever happened.
Posted on 10/2/18 at 11:39 am to The Pirate King
quote:
Even the victim doesn’t have a clear memory of the event, why would the supposed witnesses?
Because it never happened.
it also blows a hole in CBF's story about Keyser hanging out with them in the house if Keyser says she has never met BK and doesnt know him
Posted on 10/2/18 at 11:39 am to Jjdoc
I too am convinced that horrible things happened at the event that never was. The fact that it did not take place only confirms this.
Doctor Ford clearly remembers it well enough to testify to a senate committee. The fact that it didn't happen just goes to prove that the party that didn't occur was memorable.
Another WTF moment has been brought to you by the mangled remnants of a once proud party.
Doctor Ford clearly remembers it well enough to testify to a senate committee. The fact that it didn't happen just goes to prove that the party that didn't occur was memorable.
Another WTF moment has been brought to you by the mangled remnants of a once proud party.
Posted on 10/2/18 at 11:42 am to Jjdoc
She also has no recollection of ever meeting BK.......anywhere.......ever.
Posted on 10/2/18 at 11:49 am to McChowder
Original Statement . . .
She is useless to Blasey Ford's claim.
quote:
"Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford,"
She is useless to Blasey Ford's claim.
Posted on 10/2/18 at 11:50 am to Jjdoc
You can't refute something that you have no knowledge of
Posted on 10/2/18 at 11:56 am to Jjdoc
Talk about putting lipstick on a sow...
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:03 pm to Jjdoc
Translation: I don't want to say she's crazy.. but she's crazy.
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:11 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
no recollection of the incident in question
Now that's a ringing endorsement.
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:12 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
she has no recollection of the incident in question
that in itself is a clear refutation, regardless of whether she "believes" she is telling the truth or not
either you can swear you were there as a witness to corroborate it, or you refute it by saying you cant swear to that
This post was edited on 10/2/18 at 12:13 pm
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:21 pm to Jjdoc
Well that’s her opinion to believe it but it carries no weight without corroboration
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:25 pm to keakar
quote:You do not seem to know the definition of “refute”
keakar
quote:
prove (a statement or theory) to be wrong or false; disprove.
AGAIN, no corroboration. Confirm Kav.
This post was edited on 10/2/18 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:32 pm to Jjdoc
How the hell is "I've never met Brett Kavanaugh and I don't recall ever being to a party where he was present, with or without Christine Ford." not a total refutation?
She was supposedly in a livingroom with the guy, along with Judge, Smyth, and another unknown boy, drinking and hanging out with them, according to Ford's account.
Seriously, what kind of fricking loon do you have to be to say you believe someone when they say you met Kavanaugh when you know damn well you've never met the guy??
This is beyond absurd.
She was supposedly in a livingroom with the guy, along with Judge, Smyth, and another unknown boy, drinking and hanging out with them, according to Ford's account.
Seriously, what kind of fricking loon do you have to be to say you believe someone when they say you met Kavanaugh when you know damn well you've never met the guy??
This is beyond absurd.
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:38 pm to Nguyener
quote:
they are left in the elevator holding their metaphorical dick in their hands.
Is this the dick you were talking about?
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:41 pm to BeefDawg
quote:If you remember the name of every random gal you met 35 years ago, you have a memory far superior to my own ... and most think I have a decent memory.
Seriously, what kind of fricking loon do you have to be to say you believe someone when they say you met Kavanaugh when you know damn well you've never met the guy??
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:45 pm to Jjdoc
How can you "refute" something that you have no idea what she is talking about?
Stannix, "Kamala Harris touched my taint and Jjdoc was there"
Jjdoc, "I have no idea if this happened I was not there"
CNN "Jjdoc doesn't refute Strannix's claims!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Stannix, "Kamala Harris touched my taint and Jjdoc was there"
Jjdoc, "I have no idea if this happened I was not there"
CNN "Jjdoc doesn't refute Strannix's claims!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:48 pm to Jjdoc
A journalist that reports what they claim to be their gut feeling on what the truth is, as opposed to this thing called evidence, is not called a journalist. He/She/It/Shim is called a propagandist. China and North Korea are familiar with the term. Kim's sister in NoKo actually holds the very distinguished title of Minister of Propaganda.
Now think about that, and look at what the MSM wants us to be. We need to show up in stupid, ridiculous, record shattering numbers in November and Red Tsunami this alleged Blue Drip clean off the map.
Now think about that, and look at what the MSM wants us to be. We need to show up in stupid, ridiculous, record shattering numbers in November and Red Tsunami this alleged Blue Drip clean off the map.
Posted on 10/2/18 at 2:25 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
If you remember the name of every random gal you met 35 years ago, you have a memory far superior to my own ... and most think I have a decent memory.
Look, dipshit... she says she never “met him”. She didn’t say she didn’t know who he was.
“I never met Brett Kavanaugh, and I never attended a party or gathering where he was present, with or without Dr. Ford.”
Clearly that is a statement of fact. She “knows” she never met him or attended a party he was at.
If she had said, “I don’t recall meeting Brett Kavanaugh, and I don’t remember if I was ever at a party where he was present.”, then you could plausibly claim the door of possibility is still open.
But that’s not what she said. She clearly knows/knew who Kavanaugh was and is stating as a matter of fact she never met him or partied with him.
Posted on 10/2/18 at 2:30 pm to Jjdoc
Doesn’t refute it but definitely doesn’t support it. Her original statement about not knowing BK seemed much stronger.
Popular
Back to top



0











