- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mike Johnson: Releasing Epstein files without redactions could pose national security risk
Posted on 11/18/25 at 5:13 pm to SmogkDeizKnutz
Posted on 11/18/25 at 5:13 pm to SmogkDeizKnutz
quote:
Mike Johnson: Releasing Epstein files without redactions could pose national security risk
Sure.
Release the fricking things anyway, you lying slimy bastard.
They're openly telling you that it's world-changing evidence in the files :::cough cough Mossad cough::: and that's why it has to be kept secret.
Stand up and DEMAND the truth. I've written both of my Senators and all of OK's Reps demanding that they support the release and the will of their voting base. If I had to guess, the only person who'll actually do it is Kevin Hern and maybe Stephanie Bice on the House side. On the Senate side, Mullin and Lankford will shite the bed.
ETA: OK, all my Reps voted to pass. I'm pleasantly surprised. I'll still be shocked if Mullin and Lankford both vote to pass it in Senate, without half of it being redacted.
This post was edited on 11/18/25 at 6:29 pm
1
Posted on 11/18/25 at 5:17 pm to SmogkDeizKnutz
dangerous for who exactly? we need to tar and feather every single politician on that list.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 5:17 pm to TigerAxeOK
Washington needs a big coffee Enema in the House and Senate.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 5:18 pm to SmogkDeizKnutz
But I was told Epstein was not tied to intelligence. If that's the case, then what possibly could be classified?
Posted on 11/18/25 at 5:21 pm to SmogkDeizKnutz
He ain't wrong.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 5:23 pm to SmogkDeizKnutz
so MJ is saying we have to protect those who have raped children in the interest of national security ??
the guilty parties - including those who cover it up - should be fed into a woodchipper regardless of who they are and which party they belong to
the guilty parties - including those who cover it up - should be fed into a woodchipper regardless of who they are and which party they belong to
This post was edited on 11/18/25 at 5:27 pm
Posted on 11/18/25 at 5:32 pm to Earnest_P
quote:
I cannot understand why people are pushing this Epstein stuff so hard.
The Uni-Party quest to fracture the MAGA base has only been able to gain any degree of traction when it comes to Epstein.
Half of the people screaming for release of the documents are seeking legitimate justice, but wholly unaware that most of the evidence they're calling for has been tampered with from hell to breakfast.
Those of us who are patient enough to let this play out on Trump's timeline understand we will get names named, but not a moment before Trump and his team unleash fire and brimstone on everybody who is guilty of this awful network of abuse.
The truly damning stuff is in the grand jury testimony that resulted in Epstein being indicted in the first place. Ditto for Maxwell.
Everybody wants to screech incoherently about why the Epstein files haven't been released yet, and nobody is asking why the Obama appointed federal judges will not unseal grand jury testimony, even when it has been redacted to protect the victims.
This post was edited on 11/18/25 at 8:25 pm
Posted on 11/18/25 at 5:34 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Trump is going scorched earth on Epstein’s actual friends, like Bill Clinton and Larry Summers.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 5:39 pm to SmogkDeizKnutz
Hey Mike -- stick that thing where the Louisiana sun don't shine. Same to the Emperor.
Okay, so NOW we know why they finally agreed to release it; They're Dummie Files, scrubbed and redacted just like...just like...
They have 0.00001% credibility and transparency on anything and everything.
Okay, so NOW we know why they finally agreed to release it; They're Dummie Files, scrubbed and redacted just like...just like...
They have 0.00001% credibility and transparency on anything and everything.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 5:40 pm to Tigerdew
Why should the victim be traumatized again just to satisfy your prurient interest?
Simple solution is to have lawyers go through and redact victim's names. Happens all the time at the state and local level.
Simple solution is to have lawyers go through and redact victim's names. Happens all the time at the state and local level.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 5:43 pm to FredBear
quote:
This is a big part of what I mean when I keep saying this Epstein stuff is a dead end. They're not going to let the truth, whatever that may be, see the light of day.
Yeah, we knew the odds were low, but this was a litmus test of sorts. One last shot at integrity and justice. They played games and insulted our intelligence. Again. FAILED big time.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 5:52 pm to SmogkDeizKnutz
A tax revolt could also pose national security risks. We should see which one would be worse.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 6:04 pm to SmogkDeizKnutz
So, are we supporting believe what’s in the files now? No shite they gonna redact anyone involved.
No one is going to self-indite themselves. Who didn’t know this?
Who isn’t involved should be the problem?
No one is going to self-indite themselves. Who didn’t know this?
Who isn’t involved should be the problem?
Posted on 11/18/25 at 6:05 pm to SmogkDeizKnutz
quote:.
Mike Johnson: Releasing Epstein files without redactions could pose national security risk
Reading the tea leaves here, this likely means that the money stolen from taxpayers to buy missiles to give to Israel-Our-Greatest-Ally are gonna be fired back at the taxpayers working three jobs to pay for them.
It is risky I suppose.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 6:10 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:"Children were trafficked with STDs at 8 years old"
Essentially what Johnson is saying is the M-arse-ie maneuver is entirely political and irresponsibly stupid, especially in light of the fact POTUS already said "release the damn files!"
Just said on Ingraham. It was within undocumented illegals. What happened to the 300,000 under Biden missing kids?
This all needs to come out but it won't.
Congress testimony saying under Trump the children were saved and followed up on. All's we will get is names we all already know. Bill Clinton will never be arrested.
This post was edited on 11/18/25 at 6:12 pm
Posted on 11/18/25 at 6:15 pm to SmogkDeizKnutz
It’s so condescending to suggest that the American public can’t handle information. As if knowing the truth is too dangerous for our own good.
Give me a break. I’m more than half a century old. You think you can shock me by revealing anything about anybody?
But even more than that… apparently it’s okay for SOME people to know the whole truth. But not everyone. Not you and me.
Give me a break. I’m more than half a century old. You think you can shock me by revealing anything about anybody?
But even more than that… apparently it’s okay for SOME people to know the whole truth. But not everyone. Not you and me.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 6:17 pm to parrothead
quote:
dangerous for who exactly? we need to tar and feather every single politician on that list.
It's probably going to destroy a lot of people's lives who are NOT public servants and did NOT technically commit a crime, but engaged in shady unsavory activity. I can absolutely understand why redactions are appropriate. Some CEO cheating on his wife with hot young (but over 18) girls on his business trips isn't illegal, but I bet there's a ton of that kind of shite in the files. The FBI investigating criminals that they are trying to prosecute is going to have all sorts of notes and investigations involving others in the periphery of the target of the investigation. It's not good to simply release it all unredacted.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 6:27 pm to retired_tiger
quote:
retired_tiger
Trump says flattering shite about everybody...
... but, that quote is from 2002, which is obviously before Epstein got busted, and before Trump turned him out.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 6:29 pm to BigJim
quote:
How is it a national security risk?
You don’t think exposing half of Congress being balls deep in underage debauchery would create a tsunami of resignations and criminal charges? Here’s a hint, they’ve all been screaming for its release because they know it can’t really be released. What happens to our government if 50 or 100 members of congress are caught up in an international sex scandal?
Posted on 11/18/25 at 6:32 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Some CEO cheating on his wife with hot young (but over 18) girls on his business trips isn't illegal, but I bet there's a ton of that kind of shite in the files.
I think that's why Trump was balking for a while on releasing documents. It's too messy to release these materials without smearing a lot of people. The problem now is that the redactions are going to lead to cries of coverup.
Page 4 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News