- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Michael Rothschild says movies like Sound Of Freedom are the result of moral panic....
Posted on 7/10/23 at 1:41 pm to Monahans
Posted on 7/10/23 at 1:41 pm to Monahans
quote:
The people saying this are pedophiles. There’s no other conclusion for why they are constantly trying to claim this is all a conspiracy theory.
This was not my quote. You attributed it to me. I do agree with it. Your following quote sounds like a groomer.
quote:
I don't agree with this at all. I believe this line of thinking does more harm than help.
People on the left do not want this movement to gain traction because it legitimizes the Q movement, which greatly benefits Trump in the 2024 election cycle.
This is about politics, not an inherent desire to see kids trafficked and sexually abused. If the movie is true and that can be backed up in a way that breaks through into mainstream consciousness, it will not just win the election for Trump, it will affect the balance of power significantly in the legislative branch as well.
An astute political strategist on the left (with zero moral integrity) would not be doing their job if they didnt seek to discredit the movie any way they can. This does not mean they want to have sex with kids.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 1:43 pm to KAGTASTIC
It really is crazy to learn that this movie was finished years ago. Disney sat on it and finally just gave it away for nothing to be distributed for it to come out a totally beat out a Disney Indiana Jones movie. God works in mysterious ways indeed.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 1:47 pm to BigTigerJoe
quote:
This was not my quote. You attributed it to me. I do agree with it. Your following quote sounds like a groomer.
Just so Im following: because I believe there are logical reasons why leftists would try to discredit the movie other than having a desire to have sex with kids, you think I'm forming that line of thinking because I myself have a desire to groom children for sexual abuse?
Posted on 7/10/23 at 2:01 pm to Bass Tiger
Michael Rothschild is on the CIA’s payroll. QAnon wasn’t even a thing when they started writing this movie.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 2:05 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
Don't really know the who Michael Rothschild is but ...he recently appeared on CNN
So, is he one of "those" Rothschilds, then? If so, I wonder what his interest in downplaying child sex trafficking could be.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 2:10 pm to ItNeverRains
quote:
QAnon wasn’t even a thing when they started writing this movie.
Good point, script started in 2015 and Q’anon was 2017. Pretty much destroys every argument right there.
This post was edited on 7/10/23 at 2:14 pm
Posted on 7/10/23 at 2:25 pm to Sofaking2
quote:
Good point, script started in 2015 and Q’anon was 2017. Pretty much destroys every argument right there.
They know the average person is stupid and won’t do due diligence and human piss balloons like Michael Rothschild and CNN will just spew their globohomo propaganda and sheep will repeat.
This post was edited on 7/10/23 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 7/10/23 at 2:54 pm to Bass Tiger
But the 8-10 movies a year, every year, that revolve around slavery, is just art and entertainment?
This post was edited on 7/10/23 at 2:55 pm
Posted on 7/10/23 at 2:56 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
he wrote some book dismissing all the the Qanon stuff,
He did. He's a self-styled 'Qanon' expert that shows up everywhere he's invited in the hopes that folks will believe him.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 3:03 pm to Sofaking2
quote:quote:
quote:QAnon wasn’t even a thing when they started writing this movie.
Good point, script started in 2015 and Q’anon was 2017. Pretty much destroys every argument right there.
And apparently Glenn Beck asked fans to help the funding drive to make the movie.
Maybe Beck is Q?
Posted on 7/10/23 at 3:25 pm to Stealth Matrix
quote:
So, is he one of "those" Rothschilds, then?
One of those Rothschilds, yes.
One of THOSE Rothschilds, no.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 3:28 pm to Bass Tiger
I have no clue about any claims made by Caviezel on his press tour...but as a person that watched the movie, I can say point blank that it never comes close to being political in any way. It's all boots on the ground stuff.
So unless someone is willing to argue the facts of THAT, then I'm not quite seeing the issue here.
Likewise, despite the trailer seeming to lean into it, religion played no real role in it either. There was nothing preachy about any of it.
Most of these reviews were written before the release of the movie or are just lying.
So unless someone is willing to argue the facts of THAT, then I'm not quite seeing the issue here.
Likewise, despite the trailer seeming to lean into it, religion played no real role in it either. There was nothing preachy about any of it.
Most of these reviews were written before the release of the movie or are just lying.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 3:32 pm to Bass Tiger
Qanon expert? LOL. What's next, an expret on Gamergate? An expert on Cardi B controversies?
Posted on 7/10/23 at 3:32 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Q was really stupid, but to link it to this movie is so fricking retarded and nothing but gaslighting.
Here the thing, star of the movie, Jim Caviezel, did that himself when discussing the movie publically at Q conferences. The guy the movie is based on, Ballard, does not believe in the Q stuff.
Imagine if Tom Cruise, back in the mid 2000's when he was running his mouth publically about the fraud and dangers of the mental health industry (which comes largely from his Scientology background) starred in a movie saving teens from evil psychiatrist and getting them off psychiatric meds. Now there is I believe a real problem with kids being over prescribed psychiatric medication. Just like there is real problem with child sex trafficking but I could see where some might make the connection between the film and his crazy scientology beliefs.
So I get some folks knee jerk reaction linking Q to this film's subject matter due to the Caviezel publically repeating Q conspiracies regarding children being kindnapped and drained of adenochrome by a cabal of elite....bla bla bla. for the past few years while also talking about making the film.
If the film starred Chris Pratt, we probably would't be having this conversation.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 3:38 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
Here the thing, star of the movie, Jim Caviezel, did that himself when discussing the movie publically at Q conferences. The guy the movie is based on, Ballard, does not believe in the Q stuff.
Imagine if Tom Cruise, back in the mid 2000's when he was running his mouth publically about the fraud and dangers of the mental health industry (which comes largely from his Scientology background) starred in a movie saving teens from evil psychiatrist and getting them off psychiatric meds. Now there is I believe a real problem with kids being over prescribed psychiatric medication. Just like there is real problem with child sex trafficking but I could see where some might make the connection between the film and his crazy scientology beliefs.
So I get some folks knee jerk reaction linking Q to this film's subject matter due to the Caviezel publically repeating Q conspiracies regarding children being kindnapped and drained of adenochrome by a cabal of elite....bla bla bla. for the past few years while also talking about making the film.
If the film starred Chris Pratt, we probably would't be having this conversation.
Fine...but many of these were pretending to be movie reviews, which means they had them written before even bothering to watch.
Hell, I had no interest in hearing Caviezel preach at me about religion for 2 hours but as it turned out, that never happened. I'd be a disingenuous a-hole if I suggested that was in the movie simply because he's done that in various other places.
Same goes for the politics. It literally never came up...at all.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 3:48 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
Michael Rothschild
quote:
Seems Rothschild is convinced the Sound Of Freedom is right wing propaganda and unsuspecting Americans need to be warned all this child sex trafficking moral panic is being drummed up for political purposes, totally overblown
He sounds nervous
Posted on 7/10/23 at 3:49 pm to Bass Tiger
Imagine people drawing attention to literal child trafficking and others MOCKING those who do for pure political reasons.
These are the folks who voted for a corrupt crime family and geezer who refuses to acknowledge his own granddaughter.
#FJB
These are the folks who voted for a corrupt crime family and geezer who refuses to acknowledge his own granddaughter.
#FJB
This post was edited on 7/10/23 at 4:05 pm
Posted on 7/10/23 at 3:49 pm to GeauxTigerTM
quote:
Fine...but many of these were pretending to be movie reviews, which means they had them written before even bothering to watch.
That does sound like the case for some of these critics. And look I really like Caviezel as an actor and may check out the film sometime but I think some he deserves some of the blame for the misrepresentation and confusion when he is out there blabbing Q conspiracies in one breath and the next promoting his film that contains some truthful elements of the Q conspiracy.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 3:51 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
he deserves some of the blame for the misrepresentation and confusion
When fake news is actually doing 99% of it?
Popular
Back to top


1










