- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Matt Walsh: Debunking the Erika Kirk Conspiracy Theories
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:47 am to cajunangelle
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:47 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Apparently Candace that Erica Put some kind of drops in her eyes to make it appear as if she's crying.
I can only imagine her deep dive into the viscosity of widow tears and their directional path based on facial structure.
"This just isn't lining up, folks."
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:39 am to Zephyrius
quote:
The fricking governor got behind the podium and stated we got our guy no reason to look any further.
LOL.
Maybe that's because they have video of the guy before and after the shooting, DNA, social media messages between him and his "lover," and that's just the 5% of the evidence that has been released to the public.
95% of what they've got won't come out until the trial.
Not to mention the fact that if the guy was set up (which he would have to have been with the mountain of evidence that we already know they have against him), it seems like he'd be saying that. LHO was claiming to be a patsy immediately after having been arrested. Why isn't this guy?
But hey! Your ballistics expertise says that "there is no way Kirk was shot with a 30 06," so frick...that has to prove they're lying. And by "they're," I mean everyone...including the guy who is sitting in jail awaiting trial and facing the DP for the crime.
This post was edited on 2/27/26 at 10:44 am
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:40 am to KidCreole
quote:
After wackatimesthree is & all the posters parroting "Candace is Crazy, Evil, She's a Loon"......
I decided to go back and have a listen to Candace. I watched the first episode of "Bride of Charlie".
And for wackatimesthree......2 simple questions?
Do you admit to not watching, listening to Candace's Podcasts!?
Or do you affirm that you are idiot supreme with no cognitive, logical intelligence?!
It's one or the other? Because, once again, Candace is Dead On Right about her arguments, questions, facts - with Court Documents, Proof to support his suppositions!
Go ahead and take the easy fall & admit you hav'nt watched/listened. For if you have - you are indeed an idiot fool not worth anyone's time.
And IF you claim you've listened/watched......tell us the first few points, questions Candace mentions & the support documents, photos, dates she clearly divulges in her podcast!?!?
I won't wait, because you are a Pavlov's Dog Idiot and Nothing you say matters. But one way or the other......you will out yourself bigly by being unable to answer my simple questions regarding the topics/questions Candace focuses on (covered in first 20 minutes of "Bride of Charlie"), and thus clearly display to others on TD who/what you are.
That was a most impressive melt, and I respond to it thusly:
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:43 am to the808bass
quote:
You never answered my question. Other than shooting a .30-06 on peepaw’s farm, what expertise do you possess in ballistics? You can answer none and shorten this circus.
Ah, the appeal to authority fallacy.
A 30-06 goes booms and obliterates whatever is down range.
But it's ok, some folks like their info spoon fed for them and told what to think.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:49 am to LittleJerrySeinfield
quote:
Ah, the appeal to authority fallacy.
Actually you are the one making the appeal to authority fallacy.
You are claiming your own expertise proves that the gun recovered couldn't have been used. Appeal to authority works both ways.
quote:
A 30-06 goes booms and obliterates whatever is down range.
And I say a 30 06 goes pew and barely penetrates whatever is down range.
You can't refute that statement without appealing to some authority, either your own or someone else's. See?
quote:
some folks like their info spoon fed for them and told what to think.
And some folks like to think they are smarter than other people simply because they automatically and unthinkingly reject any official explanations, no matter how obviously correct the explanations are.
You guys start with the premise that the official story can't be correct (because it feeds your ego) and then backfill an alternative theory. That's not being "smart" or "skeptical," it's being more blind than the people you think you are superior to.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:56 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
Actually you are the one making the appeal to authority fallacy.
You are claiming your own expertise proves that the gun recovered couldn't have been used. Appeal to authority works both ways.
quote:
A 30-06 goes booms and obliterates whatever is down range.
And I say a 30 06 goes pew and barely penetrates whatever is down range.
You can't refute that statement without appealing to some authority, either your own or someone else's. See?
Incorrect, but whatever. I'm not appealing to authority. I'm appealing to the natural law of physics.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:57 am to LittleJerrySeinfield
quote:
I'm appealing to the natural law of physics.
You have a degree in physics?
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:59 am to stout
It’s pretty obvious the theories are retarded
But everything about Erika is weird and I get why people have questions
But everything about Erika is weird and I get why people have questions
Posted on 2/27/26 at 11:02 am to GreatLakesTiger24
So just because you perceive her as weird means people should attack her and imply she is a sleeper agent who killed Charlie and it all began all the way back to her grandmother, who used to have illegal poker machines in a back room. Yes, Candace really did bring up the grandmother, so that isn't me being hyperbolic.
Apparently, Erika comes from a criminal family, and even her parents lied about the day they were married so it makes sense that she was a CIA plant who had kids with then plotted to kill CK
Apparently, Erika comes from a criminal family, and even her parents lied about the day they were married so it makes sense that she was a CIA plant who had kids with then plotted to kill CK
Posted on 2/27/26 at 11:12 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
But everything about Erika is weird
I doubt that.
Even if that's true though, comparing people to the mean is pointless. Everyone is "weird" in their own way. No one behaves the way we expect all the time. Judging people based on a few snapshots, especially during traumatic moments, is wrong.
I've done plenty of things during my lowest moments that wouldn't make sense and might not even make sense to me. Fishing after a pretty rough funeral, going to the movies after getting some devastating news... I would never judge someone for acting differently than I think I would act. Because I don't know how I would act in her situation and I'd rather be empathetic than judgmental.
There isn't a single person on Earth who actually believes Erika is at all responsible for Charlie's death. They're just having fun speculating and creating theories like little kids, without any regard for the damage they might be doing.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 11:13 am to wackatimesthree
Candice allegedly shows a short video clip of Erica getting out of a car going in the To receive The MEDAL for Charlie. I guess because Erica walked in and didn't stop and adore fans and take pictures... This is some proof of something?
Posted on 2/27/26 at 11:15 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:I’m done with rabbit holes for the time being, but “weird” is an understatement.
But everything about Erika is weird
Posted on 2/27/26 at 11:25 am to JoeHackett
quote:there was a lot of weirdness before he was killed.
Even if that's true though, comparing people to the mean is pointless. Everyone is "weird" in their own way. No one behaves the way we expect all the time. Judging people based on a few snapshots, especially during traumatic moments, is wrong
Posted on 2/27/26 at 12:41 pm to CDUBTX
quote:
accurate portrayal of her personality
It’s subjective, amateur and amateurish, and almost fact free.
By definition, it is not an accurate portrayal of her personality. It simply agrees with your amateur and amateurish thoughts on Erika. It is of no surprise to anyone that the people most taken in by Candace’s analysis are those who cannot distinguish between fact and opinion.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 2:18 pm to CDUBTX
quote:
n this instance, I really just think she is a fame seeking gold digger.
What your think is totally irrelevant - it only becomes worthy of note when you attack someone with a gross allegation for which you have noting but your own hatred to guide you.
begone => and shape up
Posted on 2/27/26 at 2:19 pm to KidCreole
quote:
Maybe Candace has gone too far
It seems that someone, after being fired from daily wire, has checked logic, reason and good sense at the door in exchange for sensationalism, exploitation and inuendo to get paid.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 7:48 pm to LittleJerrySeinfield
quote:
But it's ok, some folks like their info spoon fed for them and told what to think.
Spoon feed me info about how the guy couldn’t have used a 30-06?
Popular
Back to top



0











