- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lower and Middle Class America has declined over the past 50 years
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:18 am to Jake88
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:18 am to Jake88
quote:
But, I agree with bringing manufacturing back.
Which manufacturing? What's the criteria for deciding whether we want to make TVs or shoes or fishing reels?
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:18 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
Simply inaccurate.
How?
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:19 am to texag7
quote:Isn't how workers are valued. A person that builds buggy whips is very skilled. A person that can build wooden wagon wheels-- supremely skilled. But if we went back to using wooden wheels for vehicles, we would not have a good economy. Even though the workers would "more skilled". The value is what you create.
How is frying fries in vegetable oil more skilled than manufacturing computer chips?
quote:You can choose two pairs of shoes. Exaclty the same. One costs $200. The other costs $5. Which one is overpriced?
Overpaid according to whom?
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:20 am to deltaland
quote:
The people arguing for cheap imports
Are you arguing for expensive imports?
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:21 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Currently a job at McDonalds is higher-paced, more skilled, and more economically productive than these jobs you want back (without governmetn intervention and redistribution of wealth).
Nope. Just because you make up stuff doesn’t mean it’s true.
If an entire chip manufacturing plant came back a McDonald’s worker would not be more skilled than most people working there.
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:21 am to deltaland
But, what if that job that comes back is just going to be minimum wage, anyway?
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:22 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Currently a job at McDonalds is higher-paced, more skilled, and more economically productive than these jobs you want back (without governmetn intervention and redistribution of wealth). Why do they deserve double/triple the salary of a McDonalds worker (+ benefits and retirement, if we're going fully halcyon)?
Not sure how you quantify higher-paced or what TF it matters to this discussion, but they're certainly not more skilled and the economically productive bit is hysterical.
The most profitable part of fast food, by far, are the beverages. Going off your metric pouring liquid in a God damn cup is extremely skilled and economically productive. How could we ever do without the experts that pour liquid into cups!?!?
This post was edited on 4/3/25 at 8:23 am
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:22 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:It's incredibly provencial to aruge that Americans are poor, while arguing that our workers aren't overpaid.
Today the poor have the ability to afford the same luxury goods that the rich do.
By international standards there are no poor people in amerca. And they are the most expensive labor on the planet.
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:23 am to Taxing Authority
quote:
You can choose two pairs of shoes. Exaclty the same. One costs $200. The other costs $5. Which one is overpriced?
What shoe is made overseas and costs $5 dollars. Nikes cost over $200 and are made by slaves
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:23 am to Flats
quote:Why must there be criteria or a decision? Won't the corporations choose their next steps?
What's the criteria for deciding whether we want to make TVs or shoes or fishing reels?
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:23 am to Azkiger
quote:
Higher earners would pay less taxes only if their salaries dropped.
Exactly. This policy is aimed at hurting their sectors and causing job loss and salary decreases (to fund the unproductive and inefficient lower-level manufacturing jobs).
That's the trade off in the policy.
quote:
How does bringing manufacturing back necessarily cause other industries to be paid less?
Increasing the cost of goods means less money circulating in those areas of the economy. Hence, the redistribution behind this policy.
The lower prices we pay for goods in our more natural economy means we have more money to spend on other things. The higher prices caused by this tariff-redistribution policy takes spending from these sectors of the economy, which will hurt those working in these productive sectors.
quote:
A smaller piece of a bigger pie might be more pie than a bigger piece of a smaller pie.
It's the same pie, at first. You're using government to determine where money spending is distributed.
The pie will likely become smaller with the tariff-redistribution policy, also, as the specific focus is to redistribute money to less economically productive and efficient sectors.
quote:
Hardly. If you make more you receive less benefits.
You're assuming the welfare class will take these jobs when jobs are available for them currently that they refuse.
quote:
Some government regs are necessary.
Thanks Rex.
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:25 am to texag7
quote:
Nope. Just because you make up stuff doesn’t mean it’s true.
I didn't "make up stuff"
McDonalds jobs exist, for economic reasons.
These lower-level manufacturing jobs do not, for economic reasons.
quote:
If an entire chip manufacturing plant
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Currently a job at McDonalds is higher-paced, more skilled, and more economically productive than these jobs you want back (without governmetn intervention and redistribution of wealth). Why do they deserve double/triple the salary of a McDonalds worker (+ benefits and retirement, if we're going fully halcyon)?
Wow. That’s pure communism mentality.
How about let’s simply level the playing field and see how it works out. That would be the most fair for everybody and give everyone a chance to succeed without the government choosing winners and losers.
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:26 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Currently a job at McDonalds is higher-paced, more skilled, and more economically productive than these jobs you want back (without governmetn intervention and redistribution of wealth).
This tells me you've never worked at McDonald's or a manufacturing site. Both of which I've done over the course of my working life.
Stick to getting people out of DWIs.
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:26 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I didn't "make up stuff" McDonalds jobs exist, for economic reasons.
Working at McDonald’s is easier and lower level than any manufacturing job foreign or domestic.
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:26 am to Azkiger
quote:
but they're certainly not more skilled and the economically productive
Then why do they exist and lower-level manufacturing jobs do not?
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:27 am to texag7
quote:
and are made by slaves
Here we go, Another pivot to emotional arguments due to losing the argument
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
and lower-level manufacturing jobs do not?
Lower level manufacturing jobs do exist in the US.
Your argument is that they don’t?
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:27 am to Azkiger
quote:
Prices can and will go up. The question is are these price increases off set by other boons.
quote:Why couldn't we just pay half the country to dig holes, the other half to fill them up, tax both of them at 50% and they'll pay for each other!
Bringing these jobs back increases tax revenues, keeps those dollars circulating in our own economy and lowers reliance on social welfare programs.
Popular
Back to top



1






