- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Libertarianism is a cancer for the right
Posted on 9/15/25 at 8:55 am to burger bearcat
Posted on 9/15/25 at 8:55 am to burger bearcat
Libertarianism is anarchy for the right. It's got a horseshoe type curve toward leftist anarchists in the sense that neither want the government to have enough authority to keep law and order.
They are ineffective politically because they have no common values or principles to rally around besides "Leave me alone and let me do what I want", which 11 times out of ten means smoke weed.
They are ineffective politically because they have no common values or principles to rally around besides "Leave me alone and let me do what I want", which 11 times out of ten means smoke weed.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 8:56 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:
He’s literally exerting governmental power.
You do know that libertarians aren’t anarchists, right? We see the need for the roads, a police department, fire fighters, the courts, and a limited military. Granted 70% of federal employees should be canned in the libertarian mindset, but doesn’t mean we don’t see the value of a government of any kind.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 8:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There was a time when promoting literal Leftism was antithetical to anyone proclaiming to be a conservative.
Pointing out that corporations have an opportunity to seize a lot of power in the near future, and that Libertarian thinking will make that easier for them, is not leftism.
Advocating wholesale for Leftist policies in reaction to that is leftism.
And sometimes you might have to react to stimuli in ways that don't 100% align with your worldview. China does this to an extreme degree, taking the reigns off the foster innovation and then once there is a workable product they go full commie. We don't have to (and shouldn't) do that, but sometimes you might have to *gasp* use anti-trust law if the situation warrants it. If you know anything about software, you would probably think we haven't used it enough in recent years.
quote:
Immigration doesn't prevent that.
Sure it does. You want to know what people the most impacted by immigration think about it? Look at election results from last year and how far border counties swung towards Trump. The number 1 issue for people in that election? Immigration.
Trump has awful approval ratings overall but his handling of immigration still far outpaces his overall approval, even with the news running videos of ICE arresting people with some likely made up sob story 24/7. You think all of that is just made up blame put on immigrants? Of course it isn't.
quote:
Why would immigrants come here without a social safety net if they had no skills or productivity to offer?
Maybe you should ask one of the millions of them living here.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 8:59 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Do you have a list of all Libertarians and how they voted?
The only major ones I can think of that didn’t vote for Trump in 2024 are Scott Horton and Chase Oliver.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 8:59 am to YouKnowImRight
there are many things the right should take from libertarianism
1) stick to the constitution strictly
2) cut spending drastically
3) for foreign affairs follow constitution
if we did those things...be much better off. I like massie and paul...most of the time, their positions are the correct ones, the problem is those in the house and the seneate do not have the appetite to cut spending or follow constitution
1) stick to the constitution strictly
2) cut spending drastically
3) for foreign affairs follow constitution
if we did those things...be much better off. I like massie and paul...most of the time, their positions are the correct ones, the problem is those in the house and the seneate do not have the appetite to cut spending or follow constitution
Posted on 9/15/25 at 8:59 am to mudshuvl05
quote:
Exactly. Republicans are the same as democrats as far as growing government. It's not as cut and dry as the OP makes it out to be.
The OP is literally eating up the divisiveness that is fed to him for this exact reason.
Guys, its important we buy the bullshite the right feeds us to take down the left.
Meanwhile on the left, "guys its important we vote for these shitty politicians the DNC puts out to beat the evil republicans."
No. We can elect our own politicians. We dont have to support a candidate that is funded by globalists
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:00 am to OMLandshark
quote:
The only major ones I can think of that didn’t vote for Trump in 2024 are Scott Horton and Chase Oliver.
Yeah, I rerely pay attention to the Libertarian party. I think most "libertarians" are hybrids like myself.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:04 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You mean the biggest, most important factor is the difference?
The social issues (ie non economic) are what's ripping the country apart.
Kirk wasn't assassinated for his views on fiscal policy.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:05 am to 632627
quote:
The social issues (ie non economic) are what's ripping the country apart.
And we're ignoring the economics which is the most important aspect
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:05 am to GeauxBurrow312
Libertarianism is how the country mostly functioned for the first 100 years with the notable exception of chattel slavery. It can only function in a high-trust, moral society. We don’t have that. Reason/Cato have no regard for culture and advocate importing the third world who don’t care about your property rights, free speech, gun rights, tax dollars and don’t understand why it’s not ok to assault women. So ironically the largest voice of Libertarianism is the entity that advocates policies that will destroy any remaining semblance of libertarianism. They’re really Libertines.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:11 am to GeauxBurrow312
quote:Of course it is.
Libertarianism is not conservative in doctrine
"Don't Tread on Me" is inherently Libertarian.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:12 am to GeauxBurrow312
quote:
We need to primary them out, starting with massie and Rand
Neither are libertarians.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:19 am to 632627
quote:
The social issues (ie non economic) are what's ripping the country apart.
Kirk wasn't assassinated for his views on fiscal policy.
Say it louder for the folks in the back
This post was edited on 9/15/25 at 9:20 am
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:33 am to frogtown
quote:
There are two types of libertarians. Milton Friedman explains this well.
The group that includes Milei, Rand, Massie etc believe open borders are an assault on private property.
If Rand and Massie believe open borders are an assault on private property, then why do they constantly vote for less border security?
You're telling me to not believe my own eyes.
Those 2 only care about less direct spending. They never consider secondary effects like how illegals cost us $150 billion per year, but they will say a one-time expense of $10b for a wall is too much to spend.
They also think illegal aliens and every foreign citizen terrorist in the world deserve the same rights as taxpaying American citizens. That thinking leads to open borders and soft on crime policies that ruin the country and threaten our sovereignty.
If Rand and Massie were in charge, there would be very few deportations. They wouldn't have the stomach for the crocodile tears of the media or be willing to spend the money. They would demand extensive "due process" for people that shouldn't be here in the first place.
Libertarians allows progressivism to grow and fester with their do nothing policies. They are the "good men doing nothing" who allow evil to triumph.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:35 am to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
If Rand and Massie believe open borders are an assault on private property, then why do they constantly vote for less border security?
Stop putting border security in increased spending bills and they will
Its all about the economy. Until govt cuts spending, we are playing and not serious
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:42 am to burger bearcat
quote:
The entire philosophy is basically let’s do nothing and sit back and watch Communists gain ground on us
So you're a lover of Harry Trumann and would love to relive all the bloodshed of Vietnam and Korea and the like?
The biggest warmongers are cowards who always want to send other people's kids to die
Most war veterans I've ever met are anti-war
We've got chickenhawks all across America rooting for war and most of them are idiot Zionists
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:44 am to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
If Rand and Massie believe open borders are an assault on private property, then why do they constantly vote for less border security?
I agree these two often let their principles get in the way, but when they vote against something that they generally agree with, it's usually because they disagree with the mechanism - such has adding things into other unconnected bills, bypassing "correct" funding mechanisms, etc.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:45 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Stop putting border security in increased spending bills and they will
Only simpletons believe that the libertarian leaning congressmen vote against "border security," they're voting against the other shite in the 900 page long bills.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:47 am to GeauxBurrow312
quote:
My problem is with libertarian theory. It’s not hard enough to weather the liberal attacks on society.
Libertarian stances on social policies like immigration, fig marriage, drug use, religious freedom (I.e building mosques) and so on have fricked our country.
once again proving that you're a psycho pathological liar convincing even yourself of your lies
true conservatives (not Zionist RINO's like you) are conservative on the issues that they should be conservative on, and they're libertarian on the issues they should be libertarian on
This post was edited on 9/15/25 at 9:48 am
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:53 am to stuntman
quote:
The problem is, though, that the reason barbarism has been able to spread like wildfire is BECAUSE of the rejection of individualism in favor of collectivism.
Culturally speaking we have been toxically individualistic. So much so that every metric of community formation, whether it be family, friends, or religious community has seen a MASSIVE DROP.
Popular
Back to top


1








