- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/29/24 at 5:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
But this population is mostly Republicans, so they're stealing it from Trump?
I doubt that party affliction matters much to the mass ballot-stuffers. Find out from that population who doesn’t vote on Election Day and ballot box stuff the rest. Hell, even if they did vote on Election Day, what’s a few double votes when no ID is required?
They’re not even citizens so they couldn’t have known any better. /s
The larger that sub-population that doesn’t require an ID to vote, the better.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 5:27 pm to Vandyrone
quote:
They’re not even citizens
This is largely incorrect.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 5:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They are legal registrations for federal purposes.
Note: This is only true if you are a citizen. Registering to vote as a non-citizen is completely illegal. Assisting or encouraging a non-citizen to register to vote is illegal. So any non-citizen who has registered to vote has committed a crime and should be deported.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 5:30 pm to M. A. Ryland
quote:
Note: This is only true if you are a citizen.
Sure, which is apparently a supermajority of this largely Republican population.
quote:
Registering to vote as a non-citizen is completely illegal.
Correct, but that's only a very small % of this population.
I think you're making assumptions about the population at issue, which I did until I read the article. These are mostly older Republican voters, not recently-registered illegals.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 5:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
First I've heard that. Is this true?
This has more to do with dems going to nursing homes and filling out their ballots for them. Which is part of their game plan every cycle. Doesn’t matter what they skew, they want to “help them vote”.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 5:34 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
And it’s going to validate all of their theories about illegal voting in our elections, even though we all know that’s not true.”
This lying biotch.
We all know the exact opposite is true.
Biotch stop breaking the fricking laws to steal elections.
Let's see how FOX News responds.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 5:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is largely incorrect
So only address the sarcasm?
In general, that will be the excuse of any double votes of the Fed-only population around the country. If they get through, great! If they get caught, just throw them out. No big deal.
The Fed-only population is easy pickings for the steal.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 5:53 pm to The Boat
quote:
Doesn’t matter what they skew, they want to “help them vote”.
And many, if not all of them, will vote. Like magic.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 5:58 pm to Jack Carter
quote:
Do you people actually believe this call was "leaked" and not intentionally handed to WAPO to provide them cover?
No kidding.
We are expected to believe that the Dem’s main concern here is that these efforts to clean up electoral rolls will defranchise Republican octogenarians “in wheelchairs”? Or that such discrepancies are not occurring in Democratic leaning precincts?
Yet still will have the usual drones in the MSM claiming that this piece of agitprop masquerading as a news story does not support the claims of orchestrated voting irregularities in Arizona. It certainly is no coincidence this story focuses on 98,000 voters in a Republican leaning district — that way the WaPo can claim charges of an orchestrated voter fraud scheme by Dems is not an issue here:
quote:
…A spokesperson for Fontes on Saturday emphasized that voting by noncitizens is “vanishingly rare,” despite claims from interest groups and figures aligned with former president Donald Trump. When Trump narrowly lost the 2020 presidential race in Arizona, he and his supporters questioned every aspect of the voting process and tried to pressure officials to change the results. Trump blamed his narrow defeat in the state in part on false assertions that thousands of undocumented immigrants had voted in the election. He and his allies never produced evidence of their claims.
This post was edited on 9/29/24 at 6:51 pm
Posted on 9/29/24 at 6:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
But this population is mostly Republicans
Says who?? You stupid gullible frick
Posted on 9/29/24 at 6:16 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
If 150k Republicans couldn't vote and were reporting as such on Twitter due to not having IDs would you support them being blocked from voting? Especially if these voters could have affected th outcome of the election?
Wouldn't best practice be to continue and let it be challenged in court if they should count or not or which parts of their ballot count?
Wouldn't best practice be to continue and let it be challenged in court if they should count or not or which parts of their ballot count?
Posted on 9/29/24 at 6:17 pm to jorconalx
quote:
Says who?
The literal article posted in OP.
They know who these people are and their partisan associations
Posted on 9/29/24 at 6:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
I'm not a lawyer, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, but to my understanding it would seem the Secretary would have to first investigate whether they are legally eligible or not before moving them to federal only. If they move them, they are de facto saying they are legal when they already know they are least not legally registered in AZ. Moving them should not make them ex post facto legal, but that's what would effectively be happening. Knowing that but still moving them for political purposes (the mentions of having to re-litigate prior elections) is therefore an attempt to defraud.
Not necessarily. For instance, a registrant can be taken off the list if they move away, as long as officials follow the NVRA’s rules about notice and timing or if they do not answer a notice asking them to confirm whether you have moved. If this is the case, then they cannot vote within the next two federal election cycles.
Under Section 202(e) of the Voting Rights Act, federal law protects the right to vote in Presidential elections if you've moved but only if you moved shortly before Election Day or if you are out of state on Election Day.
No, we expect them to follow the law by doing their damnedest to address potential voter fraud before the election, not just try to obfuscate it by moving highly questionable registrations into what is effectively an investigative black hole.
quote:
They are legal registrations for federal purposes.
Not necessarily. For instance, a registrant can be taken off the list if they move away, as long as officials follow the NVRA’s rules about notice and timing or if they do not answer a notice asking them to confirm whether you have moved. If this is the case, then they cannot vote within the next two federal election cycles.
Under Section 202(e) of the Voting Rights Act, federal law protects the right to vote in Presidential elections if you've moved but only if you moved shortly before Election Day or if you are out of state on Election Day.
quote:
(e)Change of residence; voting in person or by absentee ballot in State of prior residence
If any citizen of the United States who is otherwise qualified to vote in any State or political subdivision in any election for President and Vice President has begun residence in such State or political subdivision after the thirtieth day next preceding such election and, for that reason, does not satisfy the registration requirements of such State or political subdivision he shall be allowed to vote for the choice of electors for President and Vice President, or for President and Vice President, in such election, (1) in person in the State or political subdivision in which he resided immediately prior to his removal if he had satisfied, as of the date of his change of residence, the requirements to vote in that State or political subdivision, or (2) by absentee ballot in the State or political subdivision in which he resided immediately prior to his removal if he satisfies, but for his nonresident status and the reason for his absence, the requirements for absentee voting in that State or political subdivision.
quote:
So we expect the DEMs to claim AZ was stolen if Trump wins?
No, we expect them to follow the law by doing their damnedest to address potential voter fraud before the election, not just try to obfuscate it by moving highly questionable registrations into what is effectively an investigative black hole.
This post was edited on 9/29/24 at 7:19 pm
Posted on 9/29/24 at 6:31 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Fontes said it would be “an absolute s--- show at the counties if we tell them they need to go chase down 150,000” voters to verify citizenship
If only they would have had the last 3.50 years to have gotten this done. Oh wait...
Posted on 9/29/24 at 6:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
Who wrote the article? Was any of this verified? You really are a hack. Keep massaging your ego here, knowing you are a nothing close to what you pretend to be in here
Posted on 9/29/24 at 7:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
First I've heard that. Is this true?
quote:
Of the nearly 98,000 affected voters, most of them reside in Maricopa County, which is home to Phoenix, and are longtime state residents who range in age from 45 to 60. About 37 percent of them are registered Republicans, about 27 percent are registered Democrats and the rest are independents or affiliated with minor parties.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 7:43 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
It’s no conspiracy this alone proves that
Posted on 9/29/24 at 7:46 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
All that "we have to save the republicans so they can vote on abortion" bullshite makes me think that entire call was a staged bit of theater rather than a "leak".
Posted on 9/29/24 at 7:47 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
And it’s going to validate all of their theories about illegal voting in our elections, even though we all know that’s not true.”
?¿
Q
U
E
?
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News