- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial - Day 4 (made the thread title more accurate)
Posted on 11/4/21 at 4:47 pm to MFn GIMP
Posted on 11/4/21 at 4:47 pm to MFn GIMP
It’s his witness, but it’s also Kyle’s best witnesses. He’s not so much using them to further the prosecution’s case as he is attempting to destroy their credibility thereby Kyle’s defense
2
Posted on 11/4/21 at 4:48 pm to Chromdome35
quote:
That whole questioning segment at the end where he points out the inconsistency in the stories...was he trying to damage his own witness???
Yeah... I didn’t really understand what he was trying to do there...
Definitely sounded like he trying to
Posted on 11/4/21 at 4:51 pm to Chromdome35
DA is, for a lack of better words, fricked. 
Posted on 11/4/21 at 4:53 pm to Delusional
Can the judge cite Billy Madison when he talks to the DA?
I’m sure he has earned no points but I’m not sure God will have mercy on his soul.
I’m sure he has earned no points but I’m not sure God will have mercy on his soul.
Posted on 11/4/21 at 4:53 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
when Rittenhouse gets off, there will be another riot
Good.
It won't be in red areas.
And if those fricktards make their way into my neighborhood, there will be bodies stacked all over the place.
Posted on 11/4/21 at 5:04 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
The part where the guy described that Rosenbaum said "If I get you alone I'll kill you" I was thinking the defense would have loved to get up on their table and do the happy dance.
Posted on 11/4/21 at 5:31 pm to CAD703X
One armed soyboy is testifying on Monday. Mark Richards better fricking bring the heat and demolish him on cross.
Posted on 11/4/21 at 5:37 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
quote:
It’s his witness, but it’s also Kyle’s best witnesses. He’s not so much using them to further the prosecution’s case as he is attempting to destroy their credibility thereby Kyle’s defense
So far, Kyle's best defense has been the prosecutor who has been making Kyle's case for him with these witnesses.
And the video which CLEARLY and UNQUESTIONABLY shows Kyle acted in self-defense. I mean, that's really what this boils down, too (except maybe... perhaps... the reckless endangerment and minor-in-possession charges).
Kyle's defense lawyer hasn't been the best, either. LOADS of places where he should have objected and didn't. I mean, yesterday, the best witness for the prosecution was the prosecutor, himself, who spent most of his time narrating (testifying) without objection.
I'm guessing his strategy is just to let the prosecution's case implode, because that's what's happening- not that the prosecutor had a case, anyway. No reason to object and interrupt the prosecutor when the prosecutor is making your case for you.
Rosenbaum's girlfriend is on the prosecution witness list. If they actually call her to testify, the prosecution is TOAST. Will be an incredibly stupid move.
This post was edited on 11/4/21 at 5:39 pm
Posted on 11/4/21 at 5:41 pm to Chancellor
quote:
Rosenbaum's girlfriend is on the prosecution witness list. If they actually call her to testify, the prosecution is TOAST. Will be an incredibly stupid move.
Why's that?
Posted on 11/4/21 at 5:49 pm to Chancellor
quote:
Rosenbaum's girlfriend is on the prosecution witness list. If they actually call her to testify, the prosecution is TOAST. Will be an incredibly stupid move.
Why, is she 10yrs old?
Posted on 11/4/21 at 5:50 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
Why's that?
Her testimony INEVITABLY will end up opening up the defense to be able to ask about his past criminal charges (beating her and kiddie-diddling), which they have been prohibited from doing, thus far.
However, if the prosecution and/or witness opens the door, it's open season.
I.e. upon questioning, it comes out (again) that Rosenbaum couldn't stay at her house, the defense gets to ask, "Why couldn't he stay at your house? Oh, a protective order. Can you tell us more about that protective order? He hit you? Did he hit you often? So, he had a history of violence? He was in a hospital? What for? He wanted to kill himself? Oh, wow. Why is that? Other charges? What other charges? Kiddie-diddling? Gasp! You don’t say!”
This post was edited on 11/4/21 at 6:00 pm
Posted on 11/4/21 at 6:11 pm to NIH
quote:
Hank isn’t a practicing attorney
I wouldn't think so. Most of them here are the antithesis of ole Hank.
Posted on 11/4/21 at 6:12 pm to LSUGent
quote:
One armed soyboy is testifying on Monday. Mark Richards better fricking bring the heat and demolish him on cross.
C’Mon, man. He has a name, and that name is Lefty.
Posted on 11/4/21 at 7:01 pm to troyt37
quote:
Malicious prosecution is exactly what this is, unless you can watch that video and believe you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Rittenhouse wasn't defending his life.
Is that your legal definition of malicious prosecution?
How about this, If a malicious prosecution charge ever goes before a judge (not even proven), I'll ,,,, Well I'll do something nice for you.
Posted on 11/4/21 at 7:08 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
I want to know more about this reckless endangerment charge. What sentence does it carry? Can it be disproven if he is innocent of murder?
Posted on 11/4/21 at 7:46 pm to Chancellor
quote:
Her testimony INEVITABLY will end up opening up the defense to be able to ask about his past criminal charges (beating her and kiddie-diddling), which they have been prohibited from doing, thus far.
Are we watching the movie Sleepers?
Posted on 11/5/21 at 12:00 am to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
Is that your legal definition of malicious prosecution?
How about this, If a malicious prosecution charge ever goes before a judge (not even proven), I'll ,,,, Well I'll do something nice for you.
Oh look! Sid in Lakeshore has spit out Hankabitch’s balls to see if he’s still spitting truth to the great unwashed. No comment on all that “truth” he was spitting?
Posted on 11/5/21 at 8:52 am to Sid in Lakeshore
What's your definition of malicious prosecution?
They put a 10 year flat foot in charge of the biggest investigation in the history of Kenosha, so the DA could steamroll him with hiding evidence, and just deciding not to serve search warrants. I bet you aren't even wondering why they apparently just let the skateboard be withheld. I guess you can't withhold exculpatory evidence if you refuse to collect it in the first place, right? Probably makes for fewer things that must come up "lost" like the FBI surveillance video, right?
I guess I should have qualified my statement. This is malicious prosecution for anyone with two brain cells to rub together. You can go back to tending Hankabitch, Sid. Doesn't apply to you.
They put a 10 year flat foot in charge of the biggest investigation in the history of Kenosha, so the DA could steamroll him with hiding evidence, and just deciding not to serve search warrants. I bet you aren't even wondering why they apparently just let the skateboard be withheld. I guess you can't withhold exculpatory evidence if you refuse to collect it in the first place, right? Probably makes for fewer things that must come up "lost" like the FBI surveillance video, right?
I guess I should have qualified my statement. This is malicious prosecution for anyone with two brain cells to rub together. You can go back to tending Hankabitch, Sid. Doesn't apply to you.
Posted on 11/5/21 at 8:58 am to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
Is that your legal definition of malicious prosecution?
How about this, If a malicious prosecution charge ever goes before a judge (not even proven), I'll ,,,, Well I'll do something nice for you.
We might just be moving closer towards a malicious prosecution if this is true
LINK
Posted on 11/5/21 at 8:58 am to Delusional
quote:
DA is, for a lack of better words, fricked.
This dumb mfer straight up said, "There are SEVERAL reasons why a person would reach for a gun pointed at them, wouldn't you agree?"
It was a so ungodly retarded a question that the defense didn't even bother "leading."
Page 13 of 24
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News