- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Rittenhouse Defense Suggests Kenosha DA Colluded With Detective to Hide Cell Phone Evidenc
Posted on 11/5/21 at 8:15 am
Posted on 11/5/21 at 8:15 am
LINK
quote:
Testimony on Wednesday and Thursday from the Kenosha detective in charge of the investigation into shootings by Kyle Rittenhouse left more than a few questions unanswered about what evidence is missing from the trial.
quote:
The defense wants Grosskreutz’s video from his phone that night, but the prosecutor, working with the chief investigator, Detective Martin Howard, scuttled the video in apparent contravention of typical police homicide protocol.
As PJ Media has previously reported, the Rittenhouse defense team has already brought up questions about the disappearance of high-definition video taken by an FBI surveillance aircraft the night of the riot and shootings and then somehow lost before it made its way to the defense.
During cross examination, Rittenhouse’s attorney asked the detective about how cell phone evidence was typically handled.
A use-of-force expert, attorney Andrew Branca, wrote over at Legal Insurrection that Detective Howard “violated a number of the departments’ normal investigative practices with respect to this case, while [the defense suggests] being in unusually close and improper communication with ADA Binger himself—and, remarkably, shortly thereafter getting the plum assignment for such an inexperienced detective of being assigned the lead investigator on the Rittenhouse case.”
quote:
On Thursday morning, defense attorney Richards elicited in testimony from the detective that police had received a search warrant for Grosskreutz’s phone but never served it. When Richards asked why, the detective said it was because he wasn’t “comfortable with Marcy’s Law.”
It was at this point that Richards pointed at the prosecutor and demanded of the detective, “He’s nodding at you now, isn’t he?”
That made everyone sit straight up in their seats.
quote:
The point he was making was that the detective who was only a year on the job as a detective, and ten as a street officer, and was appointed to head the biggest case in Kenosha, was taking his investigative cues from the deputy DA, keeping evidence out of the trial that might be exculpatory.
Posted on 11/5/21 at 8:18 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
This is my shocked face.
The good news, this judge seems to not deal in bullshite. I have faith in him presiding over a fair trial. Not that there should be one in the first place.
The good news, this judge seems to not deal in bullshite. I have faith in him presiding over a fair trial. Not that there should be one in the first place.
Posted on 11/5/21 at 8:23 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
It's the Duke lacrosse rape trial all over again.
Posted on 11/5/21 at 8:26 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
This is where you get “malicious prosecution” lawsuits from.
Exculpatory evidence not turned over is a Brady violation IIRC. If they had the evidence, knew they had it, and refused to turn it over because they knew it would exonerate him, that’s lawsuit material at the least.
Frankly, it should be hanging material for the DA and cop involved.
Exculpatory evidence not turned over is a Brady violation IIRC. If they had the evidence, knew they had it, and refused to turn it over because they knew it would exonerate him, that’s lawsuit material at the least.
Frankly, it should be hanging material for the DA and cop involved.
Posted on 11/5/21 at 8:28 am to McChowder
I hope they skewer Binger and that douchecock detective.
Posted on 11/5/21 at 8:33 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
The point he was making was that the detective who was only a year on the job as a detective, and ten as a street officer, and was appointed to head the biggest case in Kenosha, was taking his investigative cues from the deputy DA, keeping evidence out of the trial that might be exculpatory.
From my simple google search, Kenosha PD doesnt have a crime lab nor do they control their own evidence. From my experience a DA wouldnt even know what evidence was collected from a scene until it popped up on their desk in a report.
So they either withheld evidence or they are actively destroying/hiding it.
Regardless, the DA's office, Kenosha PD, and Kenosha Joint Services have some questions that need to be answered about missing evidence.
Could have some huge consequences outside of this trial.
Posted on 11/5/21 at 8:38 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
They didn’t want Grosskreutz’s phone because of who he was in communication with.
Antifa/CIA was making a snuff film for recruiting (like they did in Denver and Portland) and didn’t bank on a kid being able to take them out.
Antifa/CIA was making a snuff film for recruiting (like they did in Denver and Portland) and didn’t bank on a kid being able to take them out.
Popular
Back to top

6








