- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Kevin O’Leary Explains to CNN Audience, NYC Case Against President Trump is Nonsense
Posted on 1/12/24 at 2:38 pm
Posted on 1/12/24 at 2:38 pm
quote:
Everything about the case in New York City against the Trump organization business operations is ridiculous. There are no victims. There was no fraud. All of the lenders did their own due diligence. All of the loans were paid back without issue and the statement of financial condition was factual and accurate. There were no defaults or banking interests adversely impacted. There are no victims of what the State calls “fraud.”
New York Attorney General Latisha James campaigned for office with promises to target the Trump Organization and Donald Trump himself. This is malicious lawfare in the extreme. Additionally, the statute being used as the predicate for the case is a consumer fraud statute, intended to protect borrowers from predatory lenders. In the four corners of this case, Trump is the borrower, and the banks were the lenders. New York is flipping the statute to claim the borrower defrauded the lenders, despite the lenders denying there was any fraud and there was no harm. The entire case is ridiculous.
Appearing on CNN, O’Leary Ventures Chairman Kevin O’Leary outlines to a perplexed Laura Coates why Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial in New York is political nonsense. WATCH (prompted):
LINK
Posted on 1/12/24 at 2:39 pm to GumboPot
Its complete nonsense.
He's still gonna get hit though despite it being complete nonsense.
He's still gonna get hit though despite it being complete nonsense.
Posted on 1/12/24 at 2:41 pm to GumboPot
The no victims thing is a weak argument
If I speed and don't cause an accident I'm still breaking traffic laws
Either his business committed fraud or it didn't. Whether or not someone was the victim of that is immaterial.
If I speed and don't cause an accident I'm still breaking traffic laws
Either his business committed fraud or it didn't. Whether or not someone was the victim of that is immaterial.
Posted on 1/12/24 at 2:46 pm to Powerman
Powerbottom takes.
Maybe the next sheriff election will include a guy that says he will get powerbottom for something.
Think he’d be successful?
FFS
Maybe the next sheriff election will include a guy that says he will get powerbottom for something.
Think he’d be successful?
FFS
Posted on 1/12/24 at 2:50 pm to Powerman
quote:
Either his business committed fraud or it didn't. Whether or not someone was the victim of that is immaterial.
Tell me you don’t know business and are not a businessman without telling me you are not a businessman.
The envy leaks out of people like you and that reporter for someone who can build a business knowing you are too economically illiterate to do the same.
Posted on 1/12/24 at 2:50 pm to Powerman
Suppose the police announced that they hate Powerman and we are going to get him one way or another. This announcement is notorious. They then catch you going 75 mph in a 70 mph zone. This is while others are traveling 90 mph or more and ignored. So Powerman's attorney points out that this is selective and vindictive prosecution. See link below for definition of selective and vindictive prosecution.
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 1/12/24 at 2:55 pm
Posted on 1/12/24 at 2:51 pm to Powerman
quote:are you as passionately opposed to the state of New York freeing felons of drug charges basically on the grounds they're victimless crimes?
The no victims thing is a weak argument
If I speed and don't cause an accident I'm still breaking traffic laws
Posted on 1/12/24 at 2:51 pm to Powerman
quote:
The no victims thing is a weak argument
Then what is the good argument for this case?
This post was edited on 1/12/24 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 1/12/24 at 2:51 pm to Powerman
quote:
Either his business committed fraud or it didn't.
Hey idiot, that's not the point.
The POINT is that this is a targeted Political persecution poorly disguised as seeking justice.
God you suck at the Internet.
Posted on 1/12/24 at 2:54 pm to GumboPot
This is the price you pay when you organize an insurrection that has people trying to murder Mike Pence complete with gallows.
Posted on 1/12/24 at 2:55 pm to Powerman
This is a case that is trying to turn valuation opinions into lies.
Opinions are not lies. Trump's people had one and the lender's people had one. They all did a comparison and came up with an agreeable conclusion.
Posted on 1/12/24 at 2:56 pm to Lsupimp
good Lord she still didn't get it even after he explained it. She left that thinking all real estate developers are committing fraud.
Posted on 1/12/24 at 2:56 pm to Lsupimp
Targeted prosecution. That’s what you are supporting.
Yeah. Let’s go that route. Hopefully you are next.
Yeah. Let’s go that route. Hopefully you are next.
Posted on 1/12/24 at 2:57 pm to roadGator
quote:
Targeted prosecution. That’s what you are supporting.
Yeah. Let’s go that route. Hopefully you are next.
LSUPimp is kidding.
Posted on 1/12/24 at 3:00 pm to GumboPot
Well shite.
My apologies then.
Damn it. It hard to keep all YOU PEOPLE straight.
My apologies then.
Damn it. It hard to keep all YOU PEOPLE straight.
Posted on 1/12/24 at 3:00 pm to MAROON
He needed to explain arms length negotiation to her, but I imagine she's too stupid to comprehend that one too.
Posted on 1/12/24 at 3:03 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Then what is the good argument for this case?
Answer - there isn't one. It's a joke and the prosecutors should be penalized for bringing it.
Posted on 1/12/24 at 3:04 pm to Powerman
quote:
The no victims thing is a weak argument
The almost universal rule is that civil fraud requires reliance and actual damages.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News