- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kari Lake Election Contest TRIAL! Viva & Barnes Live Commentary
Posted on 12/21/22 at 4:07 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Posted on 12/21/22 at 4:07 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
The question, which he eventually answered begrudgingly, included both 'accidental or intentional
Your attorney actually said 'accidental or inadvertent'. That was a disaster of a cross examination.
The expert witness was testifying to the technical events of the election, and the attorney was trying to get him to admit that even if a huge percentage of ballots were printed in a way that couldn't be read, the manual procedures existed to eventually count the ballots.
0
Posted on 12/21/22 at 4:08 pm to Ramblin Wreck
Is Ronna McDaniel there fighting for the Rs?
Posted on 12/21/22 at 4:09 pm to Wednesday
quote:
They are going to say the votes got counted anyway so no harm no foul.
They are going to need to be able to show the chain of custody and accurate counts along the way in order for that to hold up.
They aren't capable of that. They don't know how many ballots were in drawer 3. They don't know how many from drawer 3 made it to the central tabulation center. And, they certainly can't produce the ballots themselves.
Posted on 12/21/22 at 4:13 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
You're right, I probably wouldn't drive to another location either. I would drop my ballot into the box on site.
...and if you are a Republican, you'd have about a 7 in 10 chance of your vote being tabulated correctly...and 0 in 10 if your ballot would push the Republican candidate over the top.
Posted on 12/21/22 at 4:15 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
For years now I've heard on this board about how voting should not be so easy (when arguing against mail ballots). If they wanted to make sure their vote counted, they could have put their ballot in the box. Not leave and just decide to not vote. How is that the better option?
Only a retard would conclude that the ballot put in the mysterious box would end up being counted when the reason it has to be put in the box to start with is due to intentional misconfiguration of the system.
Posted on 12/21/22 at 4:18 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Unless there is evidence those votes were never counted, it wouldn't change anything. The cyber expert just admitted that the process would be to make a duplicate of that ballot and then tabulate it.
Duplication is a manual process ripe for fraud. The number of ballots duplicated, the original ballots and the new ballots would need to be tightly controlled and reproducible.
Maricopa county can't do that.
Posted on 12/21/22 at 4:23 pm to moneyg
Whoever is cross-examining this witness is fricking up his entire case.
Dude - you won and got signature verification dismissed. Why exactly are you opening the door? NEVER OPEN THE DOOR
Dude - you won and got signature verification dismissed. Why exactly are you opening the door? NEVER OPEN THE DOOR
Posted on 12/21/22 at 4:24 pm to Wednesday
Explain - I can’t watch
The state is screwing up?
The state is screwing up?
Posted on 12/21/22 at 4:25 pm to Wednesday
Wouldn't it be beneficial to the Lake campaign if he does go down the signature road? Why object?
Posted on 12/21/22 at 4:25 pm to theunknownknight
"The term in the law is INVALID ballot".
attorney just choked
attorney just choked
Posted on 12/21/22 at 4:26 pm to theunknownknight
Yes.
The judge dismissed an issue about signature verification, and the state guy opened the door and started asking questions about it. Basically Lake’s lawyer on redirect is going to bring out info that the state doesn’t want in . . .
The judge dismissed an issue about signature verification, and the state guy opened the door and started asking questions about it. Basically Lake’s lawyer on redirect is going to bring out info that the state doesn’t want in . . .
Posted on 12/21/22 at 4:27 pm to Ramblin Wreck
quote:
Wouldn't it be beneficial to the Lake campaign if he does go down the signature road? Why object?
To preserve when he starts asking questions about shite that was previously ruled irrelevant
Posted on 12/21/22 at 4:29 pm to Wednesday
Ms Honey just shoved the shite back up the state lawyer’s arse
Posted on 12/21/22 at 4:32 pm to Wednesday
quote:
Ms Honey just shoved the shite back up the state lawyer’s arse
She made her point and he made his point.
Posted on 12/21/22 at 4:33 pm to Mickey Goldmill
He had no point other than she only had 50 ballots because they deliberately provided no information
Posted on 12/21/22 at 4:36 pm to Wednesday
quote:
He had no point other than she only had 50 ballots because they deliberately provided no information
His point was she has zero evidence of any ballots being inserted into the ballot stream.
Her point is we can't know if any were because of chain of custody.
Posted on 12/21/22 at 4:37 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
His point was she has zero evidence of any ballots being inserted into the ballot stream. Her point is we can't know if any were because of chain of custody
Because of broken chain of custody.
Posted on 12/21/22 at 4:39 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
She made her point and he made his point.
His point was idiotic. Of course there is no evidence because they broke the law. He even conceded that there were roughly 50 ballots inserted illegally.
Posted on 12/21/22 at 4:40 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Let's say the judge has the authority to throw the election results out and a new election must be held. Would this end up being disappointing like the Georgia senate runoff and Hobbs still end up with more votes than Lake?
Posted on 12/21/22 at 4:41 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
He even conceded that there were roughly 50 ballots inserted illegally.
What was the evidence? I mean, what's the evidence that it wasn't more than that? The whole point here is nobody can verify that some number of ballots were added, or that some number of ballots were removed. When there's an absence of credible chain of custody, you end up with loads of credible questions.
Page 9 of 25
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News