- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jury Deliberation Day 2: Rekieta Law live now
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:18 pm to imjustafatkid
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:18 pm to imjustafatkid
Looks like the judge wants the jury to come back with an acquittal. If they don't, he's going to call a mistrial.
1
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:19 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
Okay - judge just admitted that he wants the jury to bail him out.
At least if there is a conviction, it will be mistried.
At least if there is a conviction, it will be mistried.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:19 pm to TigerNutwhack
The defense counsel is horrible. You cannot conceded with prejudice!
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:19 pm to Northshoretiger87
Fat Boy acting like computers have a mind of their own because he knows the judge has no idea what is going on.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:19 pm to Areddishfish
quote:Defense in a weird position here. The prosecution is clearly pushing every boundary because their most likely outcome from it is a mistrial (no prejudice). Defense doesn’t want to risk a plain mistrial. They want a mistrial only if it’s with prejudice.
New conspiracy. Prosecution is trying to throw case for Kyle, defense is paid to take him down.
Tough line to toe.
ETA: wait what? Defense moved for no prejudice? Is that right?
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:19 pm to Wiseguy
It doesn’t matter if the defense was aware of it. It matters that you had it and gave them a degraded version.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:20 pm to Wiseguy
quote:
Judge wants the jury to find not guilty so he doesn’t have to make a ruling.
exactly
the judge wants a not guilty verdict so he's not on the hook
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:20 pm to Northshoretiger87
Irrelevant.
"Alongside" isn't "in possession" of.
And it isn't the copy the state had. Period. Fatlock admitted that.
"Alongside" isn't "in possession" of.
And it isn't the copy the state had. Period. Fatlock admitted that.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:20 pm to TigersSEC2010
Fatlock is such a complete piece of shite. Lies pour from his mouth like gravy.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:20 pm to jatilen
It's not a glitch, it's a FEATURE!!
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:21 pm to BuckyCheese
I've been in meetings all morning, cliffs?
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:21 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
Fatlock is such a complete piece of shite. Lies pour from his mouth like gravy.
Prosecutors should be held to perjury charges for lying like this.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:22 pm to jatilen
quote:the few in the jury that are scared of doxxing want the judge to unburden them. the judge wants the jury to unburden him from media political scrutiny
Judge says he will not address the motion to dismiss until the jury decides if they want to rewatch the 2nd drone video
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:22 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
cliffs?
Jury is patiently waiting for videos, fatlock is slimy as ever, judge is out of touch, and defense has laid down.
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:22 pm to imjustafatkid
Fatlock is running his mouth hoping the point eventually comes to him
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:23 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
Oh god..can the lawyers actually use law.
Wasn’t a glitch. They gave them the wrong thing. They failed to go get the evidence originally. They didn’t authenticate it.
Has to be the exact same thing..come on defense. Be lawyers.
Wasn’t a glitch. They gave them the wrong thing. They failed to go get the evidence originally. They didn’t authenticate it.
Has to be the exact same thing..come on defense. Be lawyers.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:23 pm to TigersSEC2010
He knows that the judge will agree with him if he talks long enough.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:23 pm to Wiseguy
His defense has been weird for most of this trial.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:23 pm to TigersSEC2010
The defense ask for a mistrial without prejudice ? Insane
Posted on 11/17/21 at 2:23 pm to TigersSEC2010
quote:
Fatlock is running his mouth hoping the point eventually comes to him
Well, it's worked the entire time with the Judge siding with the State on virtually everything except the constitutional issue and something he had already ruled on.
Page 32 of 56
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News