- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jury Deliberation Day 2: Rekieta Law live now
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:11 pm to hogcard1964
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:11 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
This judge is scatterbrained.
Listening to the judge "uhhhh" and "ummmm" his way through the trial is painful.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:11 pm to blueboy
quote:
If it’s not legit you must acquit!
OJ murdered two people in cold blood and got away with it.
Disposing of leftist pond scum should get him a medal plus a book deal.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:12 pm to TigersSEC2010
quote:
Listening to the judge "uhhhh" and "ummmm" his way through the trial is painful.
AGREED... "AHHHHM" "UMMMMMM"....... I never thought one could say those words in an annoying Wisconsin accent....but he proved me wrong.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:12 pm to Blizzard bob
I don't see how this can go on.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:13 pm to BOSCEAUX
quote:
If there are one or two holdouts can the rest of the jury ask them to point to the specific evidence that makes them believe it’s not self defense. If those jurors refuse to answer or answer with some bull shite like I don’t like guns or he was there to start trouble can they turn that over to the judge that they are not deliberating in good faith.
Nope, they can say whatever they want and stick to that
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:15 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
quote:Excellent point. Everyone here in this thread who is protesting Binger sweeping with the AR= "I'd have ducked or spoken out" etc
I was listening to a recap on that and they framed Binger as pointing the gun as bait for Richards. If richards had objected or made a huge deal about it, Binger would then been able to say “see how pointing a gun at you provoked the defense counsel”? It literally would have given the prosecutions theory real live legs in front of the jury.
that supports the prosecution's contention of provocation.
It doesn't mean Rittenhouse DID point the gun. It means if he DID, it's sufficient provocation to react.
If you react in a courtroom when you know it's clearly unloaded, you will definitely react out in the street when it's (at that point) highly suspected to be loaded.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:15 pm to blueboy
quote:
If they convict, it's been a masterful jury intimidation coup for the Left.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:18 pm to OccamsStubble
quote:Not if the foreman reports to the judge that they are not deliberating in good faith and have violated their oath.
Nope, they can say whatever they want and stick to that
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:19 pm to HubbaBubba
What if they are the foreman?
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:20 pm to TDTOM
1 of the defendants in the Arbury case is on the stand now
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:21 pm to TigersSEC2010
quote:This judge is in his mid-80's. It's like putting Joe Biden five years from now on the bench.
This judge is scatterbrained.
Listening to the judge "uhhhh" and "ummmm" his way through the trial is painful.
"What? Huh? Don't challenge me, Fatlock!"
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:21 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:Y’all don’t think he was trying to prove his main provocation argument?
I still can't get over Binger having his finger on the trigger while pointing the gun at the jury. I know it was checked and it was cleared but still. Just horribly ignorant on how to handle a gun.
Whoever said they’d quickly duck out of the way would just be helping his point that having a gun pointed at you is terrifying.
It’s why he’s fighting so hard to lie about Kyle pointing the rifle first.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:22 pm to rt3
quote:
1 of the defendants in the Arbury case is on the stand now
“No, really, I have a black friend.”
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:23 pm to TDTOM
quote:The rest of the jury can remove the foreman moniker from that person on a vote, assign a new foreman, and pass notes to the judge.
What if they are the foreman?
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:24 pm to MeatCleaverWeaver
I don’t see the case they have against Roddie Bryan. That’s a political prosecution.
Now the McMichaels are in trouble but it’s crazy Roddie Bryan is facing the same charges.
Now the McMichaels are in trouble but it’s crazy Roddie Bryan is facing the same charges.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:24 pm to Malik Agar
quote:
I'd have yelled if that happened to me. Nobody is ever going to point a gun at me like that.
This!
My dad taught me very young. Rule #1. Never point any gun at anything you don't intend to kill.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:25 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
Kristen Barbaresi
@KristenBarbar
·
14m
The jury has 2 more questions. We don't know what they are yet. But given they asked about watching videos earlier, I suspect they asked to see some specific ones.
#KyleRittenhouse
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:26 pm to SG_Geaux
I'm thinking it has to be the Rosenbaum death that is the sticking point. The other 2 are as clear as day self defense.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:26 pm to MeatCleaverWeaver
quote:
“No, really, I have a black friend.”
quote:
Cathy Russon @cathyrusson
#AhmaudArbery - Travis McMichael testifies his truck had been broken into so many times that he started leaving it unlocked. @LawCrimeNetwork
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:26 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:They did use the HD version. But it’s from a drone pretty far away. And when you attempt to “zoom in”, this is where pixels get larger and you begin seeing holes/blur because the pixels completing the images don’t exist.
Why would the State not use the "HD" version of this video and image other than to lie and obfuscate about what is happening and what Kyle did.
So they used enhancement software to “predict/fabricate” those missing pixels. And when they did this, it now made it look like Kyle was shouldering his rifle on his left shoulder and pointing it at Zeminski.
When in reality, as can partially be seen in a different video from a different angle, it appears his rifle is on the opposite arm and pointing down. But it’s difficult to make this out, too because of lighting and angle, and it’s also a few seconds after the drone footage zoom in. But Kyle begins running and the gun is clearly strapped on him for right-handed use.
During the instructions haggling session, when we all saw Kyle and the Judge together watching a TV just a few days ago, the defense noted that the quality of the drone video they were watching was significantly better than what they had. This is when they realized they were given a very compressed quality video from the prosecution in discovery.
Meaning the defense was not able to ever view the original 1080p unedited/unenhanced version. Only the enhanced 844p version and an unenhanced 212p version.
And the likely reason for this, is that in the raw 1080p version it’s probably much easier to see Kyle pointing the gun down and in his right arm, as well is quite possible able to see Zeminski pull out a gun just before Kyle turns and runs (and then Rosenbaum chases him).
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 12:33 pm
Popular
Back to top


2









