- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Orders Fani Willis to Pay Judicial Watch $22,000 in Legal Fees
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:24 pm to Rebel
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:24 pm to Rebel
quote:
the deep state isn't error free
A first year law student wouldn’t make a mistake like getting defaulted for not filing an answer to a complaint. Pro se litigants figure out that much. I don’t think this disproves the deep state exists but either a) the deep state abandoned her because she’s a moron and kryptonite or b) she let a default judgment get entered for a reason or c) a combination of both
This post was edited on 1/7/25 at 6:25 pm
3
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:26 pm to Rebel
quote:
your denial of the deep state and the existence of lawfare is weird.
They can theoretically exist, but a single, consistent definition has to be created in order to judge.
Threads like this show that people are still evolving over what "Deep State" means to them, as well as it's competency and power
Same with globlaism, lawfare, or, hell, MAGA, American First, etc.
quote:
the case was intended to hurt Trumps chances of winning a third term. it was never meant to get this far.
The case is not over.
And there are still other prosecutions open that Trump isn't involved in. Is the Arizona case "lawfare"? Trump isn't named and it came out way too late to affect anything. It's still going, too.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:27 pm to lsufball19
quote:
but either a) the deep state abandoned her because she’s a moron and kryptonite or b) she let a default judgment get entered for a reason
I don't get the reasoning for A, given the requests.
B could theoretically make sense, but why did she fight the default in that case? She did ultimately file an answer, IIRC, just really, really late.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The case is not over.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:28 pm to lsufball19
quote:
A first year law student wouldn’t make a mistake like getting defaulted for not filing an answer to a complaint.
Fani isn't as smart as an L1. She proved that by giving a divorce lawyer a million dollars to prosecute the President, hen started fricking him, and going on lavish trips.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:28 pm to Vacherie Saint
No just stating accurate facts.
Try it sometime
No personal opinion involved. Only facts.
Try it sometime
No personal opinion involved. Only facts.
This post was edited on 1/7/25 at 6:29 pm
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The case is not over.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:31 pm to Rebel
quote:
Fani isn't as smart as an L1.
That's why the Deep State comes into play.
Sure Fanni could make this mistake. The Deep State should not be able to, given most definitions used for the concept.
And this was a public filing available for all to see, not some clandestine maneuver that took some special access. The Fulton County clerk is online
Also, this is allegedly the courthouse/clerk that just organized some huge fraudulent voting effort in 2020, so it should be filled with Deep State types or those sympathetic to the DS who would notify them.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:31 pm to Rebel
That's a 100% true, factual statement.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Well that's an entirely different argument, but it still raises the question: why even create this potential conflict when the alternative was just to file an answer?
Refusal to answer/comply = civil contempt
Outright lies in testimony = criminal perjury
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No.
They likely stand in stark contrast to your erroneous interpretations of objective legal analysis without personal opinions mentioned.
It looks like your "objective legal analysis" have been wrong.
Fani and Jack keep taking L's.
When the USSC neuters the new york case, it will be 100% failure.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:35 pm to lsufball19
quote:
a) the deep state abandoned her because she’s a moron and kryptonite
Everyone already knows they were supporting and advising her. This isn’t disputed by sane people. She went radioactive with the Wade affair and she was clearly cut tf off. Whether she blatantly ignored the subpoena in error, or is refusing to engage intentionally (like crooked arse dems have done before her) is immaterial to the assertion that “there is no deep state”, much less being proof of such.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's a 100% true, factual statement.
who is prosecuting it?
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:43 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
They’ve already been exposed. They aren’t gonna make things worse, especially not for tainted and disgrace Fanni
Ding ding ding! Vacherie gets it! :-)
This civil suit is a nothing burger in the scope of the big picture.
A situation where refusing to cooperate has less ramifications than what could happen if she did cooperate.
With the media on the dem side they can bury or smokescreen the fact that she disobeyed the court.
Possible connections, confirmation of them, well..
The internet never forgets.
There's no reason for a higher power to get involved with this. It's a small price, even if she's charged. And we know that Dems rarely serve time. Or if they do, it's never anything more than a slap.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:44 pm to Rebel
SFP might be the only lawyer dumb enough to do it
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:44 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
and somehow THIS is evidence that there's no deep state?
Yeah, make that make sense. They went to the WH for biscuits & tea.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Jenna Ellis is a disbarred felon for her lawfare
Sydney Powell also got suspended, IRCC. Rudy was disbarred.
I submit that these three are victims of the deep state, not members of it. Which of the deep state members have been held accountable/punished for their lawfare? Alvin Bragg? Hillary Clinton? Judge Merchan? Judge Engoron? Jack Smith? Fani Willis? Joe Biden? Merrick Garland? Peter Strzok? Lisa Page? Christopher Steele? The list is quite lengthy. Therefore, why would this deep state be worried?
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
from ChatGPT
the soccer board?
quote:
SlowFlowPro's contributions span multiple boards on the site, including Political Talk, Soccer Board, and O-T Lounge, indicating a wide range of interests and active engagement with the TigerDroppings community
the soccer board?
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:51 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
I want to hear the day when a judge orders Fani Willis to report for sentencing.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
As I said when this first happened, this is pretty strong evidence the "Deep State", as imagined by many on here, does not exist. If "They" existed, there is no way such a mistake would be allowed in this case.
Can’t open a thread without reading more ridiculous shite from you.
Page 7 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News