Started By
Message

re: Judge Orders Fani Willis to Pay Judicial Watch $22,000 in Legal Fees

Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:00 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477254 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

You assume a mistake


What is the logic in permitting easier access to potential communications between Fanni and Jack Smith?
Posted by tigersmanager
Member since Jun 2010
11311 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:00 pm to
How can you be this dumb
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
49699 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:01 pm to
This isn't enough. She should be jailed until she produces these communications
This post was edited on 1/7/25 at 6:03 pm
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115490 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

What is the logic in permitting easier access to potential communications between Fanni and Jack Smith?


You presume access.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
143856 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

As I said when this first happened, this is pretty strong evidence the "Deep State", as imagined by many on here, does not exist.

If "They" existed, there is no way such a mistake would be allowed in this case.


Holly mouth breathing shills, Batman. You have outdone yourself.

Are you mad?
Posted by HagaDaga
Member since Oct 2020
7900 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

Judge Orders Fani Willis to Pay Judicial Watch $22,000 in Legal Fees

Does she have to pay this out of her own personal funds or Fulton County taxpayers get to?
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
25893 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

You’ve posted over 150 times since this morning.


Sad.

quote:

Take a break buddy


No shite.

quote:

before you explode


.....or don't.

Posted by pbro62
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2016
15325 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:04 pm to
Shut up twat
Posted by tigerfan 64
in the LP
Member since Sep 2016
6490 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

As I said when this first happened, this is pretty strong evidence the "Deep State", as imagined by many on here, does not exist.

If "They" existed, there is no way such a mistake would be allowed in this case.

Yet another failed interpretation by you. The evidence is clear and open.

The deepstate and the "Get Trump" consortium acted and behaved exactly as predicted by the realists on this board.
The "deepstate" failed in court against Judicial watch.
Fani has to pay Judicial Watchs court fees and has also admitted to collusion ties to the DOJ and the Whitehouse for her "political prosecution".

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477254 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

You presume access.


The default judgment literally removes legal objections that could legally have thwarted the access.

What is the logic in stripping those responses? That sounds like they cut off their nose to spite their face, without a reason to even cut off their nose
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477254 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:07 pm to
quote:

Are you mad?

No. Nobody has been able to logically reply.

The best response has been "well the Deep State isn't really that competent anyway" (seriously )
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477254 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:07 pm to
quote:

The "deepstate" failed in court against Judicial watch.

You clearly don't know why they failed
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
73611 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

Or else what? Will he actually be willing to hold her in contempt and incarcerate ?

Doesn’t need to. Plaintiffs can execute on her bank accounts and other property
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477254 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

Plaintiffs can execute on her bank accounts and other property

I assume she was named personally for the service rules. In GA they can seize property of heads of agencies who were named for service purposes?

I'm asking legitimately, because I presume the county/office will have to pay it.
Posted by tigerfan 64
in the LP
Member since Sep 2016
6490 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:12 pm to
A fail is a fail.
Fani could have turned over the documents that tied her actions to the DOJ for her prosecution and refused to do so.
She wanted to cover up the ties.
Seems I do know why the deepstate failed.
You refuse to admit or acknowledge it.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115490 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:15 pm to
quote:

The default judgment literally removes legal objections that could legally have thwarted the access.


All there is is a piece of paper. That's it. As long as she's DA, she can thumb her nose at this judge and she will.
Posted by tigerfan 64
in the LP
Member since Sep 2016
6490 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

Because you are a true believer.


I am not

quote:
In Jack Smith.


Naw

quote:
In Garland and the DOJ


Naw

quote:
In Fani Willis


Certainly no

These statements stand in stark contrast to your previous positions during these Trump prosecutions.
TDS exemplified.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477254 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

All there is is a piece of paper. That's it. As long as she's DA, she can thumb her nose at this judge and she will.


Well that's an entirely different argument, but it still raises the question: why even create this potential conflict when the alternative was just to file an answer?
This post was edited on 1/7/25 at 6:17 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477254 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:17 pm to
quote:

These statements stand in stark contrast to your previous positions during these Trump prosecutions.

No.

They likely stand in stark contrast to your erroneous interpretations of objective legal analysis without personal opinions mentioned.

Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
143856 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:21 pm to
your denial of the deep state and the existence of lawfare is weird.

the deep state isn't error free. they got into bed with 2 really dumb attorneys in Fulton.

the case was intended to hurt Trumps chances of winning a third term. it was never meant to get this far. they just wanted a mug shot.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram