- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:01 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
This isn't enough. She should be jailed until she produces these communications
This post was edited on 1/7/25 at 6:03 pm
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What is the logic in permitting easier access to potential communications between Fanni and Jack Smith?
You presume access.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
As I said when this first happened, this is pretty strong evidence the "Deep State", as imagined by many on here, does not exist.
If "They" existed, there is no way such a mistake would be allowed in this case.
Holly mouth breathing shills, Batman. You have outdone yourself.
Are you mad?
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:04 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Judge Orders Fani Willis to Pay Judicial Watch $22,000 in Legal Fees
Does she have to pay this out of her own personal funds or Fulton County taxpayers get to?
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:04 pm to texag7
quote:
You’ve posted over 150 times since this morning.
Sad.
quote:
Take a break buddy
No shite.
quote:
before you explode
.....or don't.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
As I said when this first happened, this is pretty strong evidence the "Deep State", as imagined by many on here, does not exist.
If "They" existed, there is no way such a mistake would be allowed in this case.
Yet another failed interpretation by you. The evidence is clear and open.
The deepstate and the "Get Trump" consortium acted and behaved exactly as predicted by the realists on this board.
The "deepstate" failed in court against Judicial watch.
Fani has to pay Judicial Watchs court fees and has also admitted to collusion ties to the DOJ and the Whitehouse for her "political prosecution".
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:05 pm to udtiger
quote:
You presume access.
The default judgment literally removes legal objections that could legally have thwarted the access.
What is the logic in stripping those responses? That sounds like they cut off their nose to spite their face, without a reason to even cut off their nose
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:07 pm to Rebel
quote:
Are you mad?
No. Nobody has been able to logically reply.
The best response has been "well the Deep State isn't really that competent anyway" (seriously
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:07 pm to tigerfan 64
quote:
The "deepstate" failed in court against Judicial watch.
You clearly don't know why they failed
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:08 pm to dakarx
quote:
Or else what? Will he actually be willing to hold her in contempt and incarcerate ?
Doesn’t need to. Plaintiffs can execute on her bank accounts and other property
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:10 pm to lsufball19
quote:
Plaintiffs can execute on her bank accounts and other property
I assume she was named personally for the service rules. In GA they can seize property of heads of agencies who were named for service purposes?
I'm asking legitimately, because I presume the county/office will have to pay it.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
A fail is a fail.
Fani could have turned over the documents that tied her actions to the DOJ for her prosecution and refused to do so.
She wanted to cover up the ties.
Seems I do know why the deepstate failed.
You refuse to admit or acknowledge it.
Fani could have turned over the documents that tied her actions to the DOJ for her prosecution and refused to do so.
She wanted to cover up the ties.
Seems I do know why the deepstate failed.
You refuse to admit or acknowledge it.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The default judgment literally removes legal objections that could legally have thwarted the access.
All there is is a piece of paper. That's it. As long as she's DA, she can thumb her nose at this judge and she will.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Because you are a true believer.
I am not
quote:
In Jack Smith.
Naw
quote:
In Garland and the DOJ
Naw
quote:
In Fani Willis
Certainly no
These statements stand in stark contrast to your previous positions during these Trump prosecutions.
TDS exemplified.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:16 pm to udtiger
quote:
All there is is a piece of paper. That's it. As long as she's DA, she can thumb her nose at this judge and she will.
Well that's an entirely different argument, but it still raises the question: why even create this potential conflict when the alternative was just to file an answer?
This post was edited on 1/7/25 at 6:17 pm
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:17 pm to tigerfan 64
quote:
These statements stand in stark contrast to your previous positions during these Trump prosecutions.
No.
They likely stand in stark contrast to your erroneous interpretations of objective legal analysis without personal opinions mentioned.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 6:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
your denial of the deep state and the existence of lawfare is weird.
the deep state isn't error free. they got into bed with 2 really dumb attorneys in Fulton.
the case was intended to hurt Trumps chances of winning a third term. it was never meant to get this far. they just wanted a mug shot.
the deep state isn't error free. they got into bed with 2 really dumb attorneys in Fulton.
the case was intended to hurt Trumps chances of winning a third term. it was never meant to get this far. they just wanted a mug shot.
Popular
Back to top



1






