- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Orders Fani Willis to Pay Judicial Watch $22,000 in Legal Fees
Posted on 1/7/25 at 7:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/7/25 at 7:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
who would you rather have sex with? Messi or Ronaldo?
0
Posted on 1/7/25 at 7:25 pm to Trevaylin
quote:
simpler legal question for sfp. Does Fani pay the fine or the county in which she is employed.
Depends on whether the suit is against her office, or her personally. If it's her office, it's taxpayer.
I'm thinking the suit is against her. So it's her tab the bill goes to.
However, the likelihood that she pays the majority of it, is slim. The Dems party will help out in some form or another.
Edit: been thinking about it more, and I'm really starting to doubt that the suit is against her directly
Leaning more towards her office, so county may have to pay.
This post was edited on 1/7/25 at 8:18 pm
Posted on 1/7/25 at 7:29 pm to Nosevens
quote:
All these didn’t happen in a vacuum and someone will do a tell all sooner or later. You on the other hand cannot admit you see it because as we all suspect you suffer from the same elitism that these others do.
Bravo.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 7:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:the FBI couldn't muzzle Latoya. We are going in circles using your own logic. Sorry, no matter how many times you repeat the same tired shite, you're still fricked by your own arguments
It's a very strong argument against, at the least, the DS's ability to actually do anything properly.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 7:47 pm to UncleFestersLegs
He's butt hurt and is dreading the next 8 - 12 years.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 7:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
But not filing an answer makes potential testimony a potential threat more quickly and without the potential exclusions the answer may have provided
Do you understand how a fricking default judgment works?
Posted on 1/7/25 at 7:57 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Slow Fanni Pro is hurt.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 8:24 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
I do not know all the nuts and bolts of this litigation, but apparently she ignored a court ordered request for production of documents. She has been cast to pay the legal fees of the plaintiff incurred in obtaining the order and the subsequent hearing on the ruling. Unfortunately, this award of attorney fees will probably have to be paid by the taxpayers. However, she has exposed the public to this liability by intentionally failing to properly execute a function of her office. This should expose her to charges of malfeasance in office and prosecution. Nonetheless, nothing will happen unless the Georgia Attorney General grows a pair (which won’t happen).
Posted on 1/7/25 at 8:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
As I said when this first happened, this is pretty strong evidence the "Deep State", as imagined by many on here, does not exist.
If "They" existed, there is no way such a mistake would be allowed in this case.
You stupid frick, she is DEI so it is not supposed to matter.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 8:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
I take issue with your "final summary table"
I would rate your Engagement style as 0-1, as all you ever do is try to piss people off.
I would rate your versatility as a 2-3, your thread plots follow a very standard protocol.
You might provide support for your entertainment value by pointing out your favorable/unfavorable likes score.
I do not have a lot of data on the rest of the folks in your list, but you would have trouble working in a large organization. Overall I would rate you in the third staffing quartile
I would rate your Engagement style as 0-1, as all you ever do is try to piss people off.
I would rate your versatility as a 2-3, your thread plots follow a very standard protocol.
You might provide support for your entertainment value by pointing out your favorable/unfavorable likes score.
I do not have a lot of data on the rest of the folks in your list, but you would have trouble working in a large organization. Overall I would rate you in the third staffing quartile
Posted on 1/7/25 at 9:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yeah you file an answer or get defaulted. She didn't file an answer, which, as I said, is the most basic legal requirement. As someone else said earlier, most pro se litigants understand the concept.
Except she did file an answer. The court just found it wasn’t timely and her arguments about faulty service were without merit.
She responded. She made arguments and then lost. She made a calculated decision to challenge adequacy of service and lost. Completely different than not filing anything at all—-a lie you keep repeating to try and make a flawed point.
“They” chose a strategy and the court ruled against them. How is that evidence “they” don’t exist?
This post was edited on 1/7/25 at 9:41 pm
Posted on 1/7/25 at 9:40 pm to LSUFAITHFUL2
LINK to judgment that discusses the ANSWER that Fani Willis filed.
quote:
Plaintiff moved for default judgment on 30 April 2024. Defendant made her first appearance in the case on 15 May 2024 with an answer and response opposing Plaintiff’s motion.
Page 9 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News