Started By
Message

re: Judge Orders Fani Willis to Pay Judicial Watch $22,000 in Legal Fees

Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:03 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477257 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

---Because the deep state would be error free?

---Because they would despose of the bodies like Seth ?

---Because they were proficient in wiping phones like Hillary?

---Because they were mentally deficient , not subject to trial like Biden

---Because they put dei above truth

---Because agents on horseback were pseudo whipping illegals

---Because of the Afghan disaster.

---Because of Hunter getting an all purpose pardon

---Bevcause Houthis on horseback run circles around an aircraft carrier



Again, so this group of nefarious globalists can orchestrate all of this without leaving any evidence they exist, but they can't file the most basic legal answer?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477257 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

I reject the notion that, for the "deep state" to "exist" it must be this omnipotent infallible entity


That standard doesn't apply to not filing an answer and you know this

quote:

a stupid mistake such as this.

This is beyond stupid and this isn't some random situation.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
97057 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:05 pm to
Can anyone explain why she is personally responsible for the judgement?

I’m glad it is but why exactly isn’t her office on the hook?
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47628 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:06 pm to
Because it’s not a mistake
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
110973 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:07 pm to
Do you think they could have easily found a brilliant legal mind to implement the shite Fanni did, but they just chose her for fun?

How do you possibly ignore how much contact she and her office had with the White House?
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47628 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:09 pm to
We already know for a fact she was colluding with J6 and Smith. We know Wade was meeting with WH counsel.

But there’s no deep state involvement y’all
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
93423 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

As I said when this first happened, this is pretty strong evidence the "Deep State", as imagined by many on here, does not exist.

If "They" existed, there is no way such a mistake would be allowed in this case.

"they" very much DO exist.

"they" are just smug incompetent assholes who always have their shite cleaned up by their Democrate buddies & 3 letter government agencies who applaud and help them in any way they can and they can murder people and it will still be covered up/ignored by the media.

"they" have gotten lazy and complacent and don't give a shite because nothing ever happens.



Exhibit A. How much money did Biden's handlers pay this piece of filth again?
This post was edited on 1/7/25 at 5:13 pm
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
104099 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:11 pm to
She has that much under her pillow.
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
16880 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

Your brain just malfunctioned
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477257 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

Because it’s not a mistake


This opens up potential exposure to the Deep State. That's not a mistake?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477257 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

Do you think they could have easily found a brilliant legal mind to implement the shite Fanni did, but they just chose her for fun?


Again, more evidence against the DS.

quote:

How do you possibly ignore how much contact she and her office had with the White House?

That doesn't prove a "Deep State" unless we're adding a new definition to the term (ending up with like 50 at this point)
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477257 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:13 pm to
Who said "the FBI doesn't exist" ?
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
16880 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

How do you possibly ignore how much contact she and her office had with the White House?
yoga recipes. Perfectly normal
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
93423 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

This opens up potential exposure to the Deep State. That's not a mistake?


its laughable you're ignoring just how much the buddy-buddy system protects them.

I'll self ban HAPPILY if this dumb bitch doesn't land on her feet with some type of cushy job, a government medal and/or cash rewards.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
110973 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

uote:
How do you possibly ignore how much contact she and her office had with the White House?

That doesn't prove a "Deep State" unless we're adding a new definition to the term (ending up with like 50 at this point)


I guess I'm back to having no clue what the frick you are getting at or what you think you are getting at then.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477257 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

its laughable you're ignoring just how much the buddy-buddy system protects them.

Again, she's already lost this case and ha been ordered to pay $22k and the documents have not even been delivered, i don't believe.

quote:

I'll self ban HAPPILY if this dumb bitch doesn't land on her feet with some type of cushy job, a government medal and/or cash rewards.

That's irrelevant to the discussion, though, regarding the Deep State and its exposure.
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
16880 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

Who said "the FBI doesn't exist" ?
they let an idiot with a microphone destroy their whole narrative so obviously, like the deep state, they don't exist. You're hoist with your own petard.
Posted by timdonaghyswhistle
Member since Jul 2018
21070 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

If "They" existed, there is no way such a mistake would be allowed in this case.


This is a circular argument.

You can't prove they exist. But if you do find evidence, it proves that they aren't as smart as you think they are.
Posted by BFIV
Virginia
Member since Apr 2012
8891 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

Do you think the all powerful group of globalist elites would make a mistake as blatant as not filing an answer to avoid default?


Why would this deep state be worried? Has anyone been held accountable/punished for all the deep state lawfare up to this point in time?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477257 posts
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

I guess I'm back to having no clue what the frick you are getting at or what you think you are getting at then.


Well part of it is the malleability of "The Deep State" and this thread has gotten there.

When these terms are put to the test, it's the usual result. You have the typical melters posting inane and irrational stuff and then people who do try to discuss the applicability of the term to the facts end up having to redefine it to "prove me wrong. "
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram