- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Orders Fani Willis to Pay Judicial Watch $22,000 in Legal Fees
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:03 pm to Trevaylin
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:03 pm to Trevaylin
quote:
---Because the deep state would be error free?
---Because they would despose of the bodies like Seth ?
---Because they were proficient in wiping phones like Hillary?
---Because they were mentally deficient , not subject to trial like Biden
---Because they put dei above truth
---Because agents on horseback were pseudo whipping illegals
---Because of the Afghan disaster.
---Because of Hunter getting an all purpose pardon
---Bevcause Houthis on horseback run circles around an aircraft carrier
Again, so this group of nefarious globalists can orchestrate all of this without leaving any evidence they exist, but they can't file the most basic legal answer?
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:04 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
I reject the notion that, for the "deep state" to "exist" it must be this omnipotent infallible entity
That standard doesn't apply to not filing an answer and you know this
quote:
a stupid mistake such as this.
This is beyond stupid and this isn't some random situation.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:05 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Can anyone explain why she is personally responsible for the judgement?
I’m glad it is but why exactly isn’t her office on the hook?
I’m glad it is but why exactly isn’t her office on the hook?
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
Because it’s not a mistake
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
Do you think they could have easily found a brilliant legal mind to implement the shite Fanni did, but they just chose her for fun?
How do you possibly ignore how much contact she and her office had with the White House?
How do you possibly ignore how much contact she and her office had with the White House?
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:09 pm to Y.A. Tittle
We already know for a fact she was colluding with J6 and Smith. We know Wade was meeting with WH counsel.
But there’s no deep state involvement y’all
But there’s no deep state involvement y’all
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
As I said when this first happened, this is pretty strong evidence the "Deep State", as imagined by many on here, does not exist.
If "They" existed, there is no way such a mistake would be allowed in this case.
"they" very much DO exist.
"they" are just smug incompetent assholes who always have their shite cleaned up by their Democrate buddies & 3 letter government agencies who applaud and help them in any way they can and they can murder people and it will still be covered up/ignored by the media.
"they" have gotten lazy and complacent and don't give a shite because nothing ever happens.
Exhibit A. How much money did Biden's handlers pay this piece of filth again?
This post was edited on 1/7/25 at 5:13 pm
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:11 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
She has that much under her pillow.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Your brain just malfunctioned

Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:11 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Because it’s not a mistake
This opens up potential exposure to the Deep State. That's not a mistake?
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:12 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Do you think they could have easily found a brilliant legal mind to implement the shite Fanni did, but they just chose her for fun?
Again, more evidence against the DS.
quote:
How do you possibly ignore how much contact she and her office had with the White House?
That doesn't prove a "Deep State" unless we're adding a new definition to the term (ending up with like 50 at this point)
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:13 pm to UncleFestersLegs
Who said "the FBI doesn't exist" ?
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:13 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:yoga recipes. Perfectly normal
How do you possibly ignore how much contact she and her office had with the White House?
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This opens up potential exposure to the Deep State. That's not a mistake?
its laughable you're ignoring just how much the buddy-buddy system protects them.
I'll self ban HAPPILY if this dumb bitch doesn't land on her feet with some type of cushy job, a government medal and/or cash rewards.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
uote:
How do you possibly ignore how much contact she and her office had with the White House?
That doesn't prove a "Deep State" unless we're adding a new definition to the term (ending up with like 50 at this point)
I guess I'm back to having no clue what the frick you are getting at or what you think you are getting at then.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:16 pm to CAD703X
quote:
its laughable you're ignoring just how much the buddy-buddy system protects them.
Again, she's already lost this case and ha been ordered to pay $22k and the documents have not even been delivered, i don't believe.
quote:
I'll self ban HAPPILY if this dumb bitch doesn't land on her feet with some type of cushy job, a government medal and/or cash rewards.
That's irrelevant to the discussion, though, regarding the Deep State and its exposure.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:they let an idiot with a microphone destroy their whole narrative so obviously, like the deep state, they don't exist. You're hoist with your own petard.
Who said "the FBI doesn't exist" ?
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If "They" existed, there is no way such a mistake would be allowed in this case.
This is a circular argument.
You can't prove they exist. But if you do find evidence, it proves that they aren't as smart as you think they are.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Do you think the all powerful group of globalist elites would make a mistake as blatant as not filing an answer to avoid default?
Why would this deep state be worried? Has anyone been held accountable/punished for all the deep state lawfare up to this point in time?
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:19 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
I guess I'm back to having no clue what the frick you are getting at or what you think you are getting at then.
Well part of it is the malleability of "The Deep State" and this thread has gotten there.
When these terms are put to the test, it's the usual result. You have the typical melters posting inane and irrational stuff and then people who do try to discuss the applicability of the term to the facts end up having to redefine it to "prove me wrong. "
Popular
Back to top



1







