- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Orders Fani Willis to Pay Judicial Watch $22,000 in Legal Fees
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
As I said when this first happened, this is pretty strong evidence the "Deep State", as imagined by many on here, does not exist.
If "They" existed, there is no way such a mistake would be allowed in this case.
Actually the fact that we're at this point, proves there IS a DS. They run roughshod over all of us, without consequence. She'll never pay. There won't be FEDS at her door at 6AM to haul her off to jail for not paying. The fact you seem unbothered by the fact she was colluding with the J6 set up says a lot...
0
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I said when this first happened, this is pretty strong evidence the "Deep State", as imagined by many on here, does not exist.
What does it matter when the deep state is going to cut the $22K check. Small price to pay for damage mitigation.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:39 pm to Screaming Viking
quote:
Now knowing that Fani and bone boy had communication and direction from the White House……what does that tell you, sfp?
I'd have to see the communications to judge.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:39 pm to LSUSkip
quote:
What does it matter when the deep state is going to cut the $22K check
That case doesn't end with the payment. That's the issue.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
You’ve posted over 150 times since this morning.
Take a break buddy before you explode
Take a break buddy before you explode
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Oh shite, MOAR malleable words
Oh shite
More pretending you are an unbiased Barrister when in fact you are a Leftist
loon that Trump permanently damaged
Your struggles have become piteous
This next year will be an adventure for you
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:42 pm to bamadontcare
quote:
when in fact you are a Leftist
Me making fun of silly conspiracy theory logic and malleable terms requires no partisanship.
quote:
that Trump permanently damaged
The projection is always funny, though.
quote:
This next year will be an adventure for you
Watching more MAGA civil wars will be entertaining. I can't wait to pop some bubbles, though. The doomers and "small government conservatives" are likely goign to expose themselves bigly next year.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Kind of like how you "prove" they exist by the lack of evidence.
Correct.
So you're saying he can't prove they exist and you can't prove they don't.
How many pages of mental masturbation did it take to arrive right back where you started... with nothing
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:oh my we've discovered a definition for this recalcitrant and quite malleable word. Prepping for Bondi no doubt
Jenna Ellis is a disbarred felon for her lawfare
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'd have to see the communications to judge
Okay…what would your educated/uneducated guess be?
ETA I guess no response means you don't want to get nailed down to giving an actual opinion because you know that you are an arse clown. Or, you know that you are being willfully blind. either way...
This post was edited on 1/8/25 at 10:30 am
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:49 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
So you're saying he can't prove they exist and you can't prove they don't.
I'm saying CT logic is this.
The larger point of my comments in this thread is specifically calling out CT logic (since you're clearly behind, I had to spell it out for you).
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:50 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
oh my we've discovered a definition for this recalcitrant and quite malleable word.
It's a joke, not a dick.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If "They" existed, there is no way such a mistake would be allowed in this case.
Imagine eating crayons and typing this non-sense
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:51 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
Prepping for Bondi no doubt
Oh believe me, lots of users of the term will have to defend their stances in the future. This is why they refuse to define it, so they can claim they're not being hypocrites.
I expect lots of melts and dishonesty, as is expected with the population cohort at hand.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:52 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
Imagine eating crayons and typing this non-sense
imagine thinking this grouping is so powerful it has taken over countries for decades but can't do the most basic legal functions a middle schooler could do.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:anything that destroys your argument is just CT. How convenient.
I'm saying CT logic is this.
The point remains that fanis stupidity isn't proof that there is no DS which was your launching point. You got destroyed by simple logic and you have nowhere left to go and obviously don't know when to stop digging
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:58 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
she keeps that kind of cash on her because "black peoples".
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:58 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
anything that destroys your argument is just CT. How convenient.
Damn and I even walked you through it.
You're still having issues.
quote:
fanis stupidity isn't proof that there is no DS
It's a very strong argument against, at the least, the DS's ability to actually do anything properly.
quote:
. You got destroyed by simple logic
Where?
You clearly don't even understand the point even when it was explained to you in words a 3rd grader would understand.
You seem to be just flailing out of anger here and making shite up
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
As I said when this first happened, this is pretty strong evidence the "Deep State", as imagined by many on here, does not exist.
If "They" existed, there is no way such a mistake would be allowed in this case.
You assume a mistake
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:59 pm to goatmilker
quote:
think she will demand help/money from those who brought her to the party slo. Then things probably won't go so well for her.
ActBlue probly has her back.
Page 5 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News