- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:32 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:because activist judges are really, marxist criminals
why does shite like this even need to be litigated or respected?
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:33 am to MemphisGuy
You've always been able to vote without an ID, you do a provisional ballot, and then the district is supposed to verify after the fact that you were indeed you said you were. The problem is this gets left to the district and is selectively enforced.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:44 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Getting it in front of Appeals court and or Supreme court to set precedent is the ultimate plan.....
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:47 am to deltadummy
quote:
"There is no dispute (nor could there be) that U.S. citizenship is required to vote in federal elections and the federal voter registration forms require attestation of citizenship," Casper wrote. "The issue here is whether the president can require documentary proof of citizenship where the authority for election requirements is in the hands of Congress, its statutes ... do not require it, and the statutorily created [Election Assistance Commission] is required to go through a notice and comment period and consult with the States before implementing any changes to the federal forms for voter registration."
Nothing wrong with strenthening ID laws, but this isn't a dismissal of citizenship requirements. You're mainstreammediaing the issue.
I figured that tweet was rage bait.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:50 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:If Obama had a son, this is what he'd look like ...
an OBAMA judge ...
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:51 am to deltadummy
quote:
Nothing wrong with strenthening ID laws, but this isn't a dismissal of citizenship requirements
Of course it is. That is the practical effect of simply requiring attestation. You’re probably not doing yourself any favors calling others on here stupid.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:52 am to MemphisGuy
quote:
MemphisGuy
Germantown, TN
I ate at Commissary BBQ awhile back. It was overrated.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:52 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Isn’t the Constitution and legal precedent pretty clear about non citizens not being allowed to vote?
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:56 am to Old Money
quote:
quote:
"There is no dispute (nor could there be) that U.S. citizenship is required to vote in federal elections and the federal voter registration forms require attestation of citizenship," Casper wrote. "The issue here is whether the president can require documentary proof of citizenship where the authority for election requirements is in the hands of Congress, its statutes ... do not require it, and the statutorily created [Election Assistance Commission] is required to go through a notice and comment period and consult with the States before implementing any changes to the federal forms for voter registration."
Nothing wrong with strenthening ID laws, but this isn't a dismissal of citizenship requirements. You're mainstreammediaing the issue.
I figured that tweet was rage bait.
So no proof required? That should be mandatory.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 9:57 am to deltadummy
Yea but she blocking an eo how is that strengthening? When the majority of dem counties don’t check id’s. She blocking an attempt to check id.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:02 am to ninthward
quote:SFP assured me illegals don't vote so there's no need to check. People don't drive drunk either so we can dispense with all that enforcement nonsense as well
When the majority of dem counties don’t check id’s. She blocking an attempt to check id.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:19 am to dgnx6
quote:
And the vote still counts because it may be discovered after the fact because you don’t need to prove you are a citizen to vote.
Democrats want to count ballots.
Non democrats want to count legal votes.
There is a huge difference between the two of them.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:25 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Tree of Liberty needs to be utilized.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:31 am to deltadummy
quote:
"The issue here is whether the president can require documentary proof of citizenship where the authority for election requirements is in the hands of Congress
Seems like she is saying Congress needs to get off of their asses for once.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:34 am to coolpapaboze
Raj went a little sweet after What's Happenin was canceled
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:36 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Of course she did.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 10:54 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
How many federal judgeships has Trump made nominations for? Get busy Donald!
Popular
Back to top



0









